• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与式利益相关者群体的能力建设:德国积极生活方式研究联盟的成果。

Capacity building in participatory stakeholder groups: results from a German research consortium on active lifestyles.

机构信息

Medical Sociology, University of Regensburg, Dr.-Gessler-Straße 17, Regensburg 93051, Germany.

出版信息

Health Promot Int. 2021 Dec 13;36(Supplement_2):ii65-ii78. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab165.

DOI:10.1093/heapro/daab165
PMID:34905613
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8672937/
Abstract

To implement sustainable health-promoting structures in a setting, various agents must work together. In the Capital4Health research network, participatory stakeholder groups consisting of key persons, stakeholders, representatives of the target group, and facilitating experts are assembled in five settings (child care center, school, company, rural community, nursing home). In a Cooperative Planning process, the various groups meet regularly to plan and implement strategies to promote physical activity across different settings. This study evaluates whether participatory stakeholder groups have been established and also examines the capacity-building processes that took place in these stakeholder groups. For process evaluation, 78 group meetings were documented in 16 different stakeholder groups using a semi-structured protocol based on established capacity-building domains. For outcome evaluation, six semi-structured interviews (1-2 per setting) with facilitating experts were conducted. Data were analyzed by content analysis. Across all settings, capacity-building processes were successful to a certain degree (e.g. problem assessment, resource mobilization). However, in most groups it was difficult to broadly assess problems, to establish sustainable networks, or to find persons with leadership characteristics. Also, irregular participation, lack of motivation to take over responsibility, and minimal institutional readiness for structural and personal changes often hindered the progress of the projects. Stakeholder groups can actively involve setting members in the development of physical activity promotion programs. It seems challenging, however, to sustainably establish such groups that continue working independently without assistance from a facilitating expert.

摘要

为了在特定环境中实现可持续的健康促进结构,需要各种机构共同努力。在 Capital4Health 研究网络中,参与者利益相关者群体由关键人员、利益相关者、目标群体代表和促进专家组成,共分为五个环境(儿童保育中心、学校、公司、农村社区、养老院)。在合作规划过程中,各个群体定期会面,计划和实施在不同环境中促进身体活动的策略。本研究评估了参与式利益相关者群体是否已经建立,并检查了这些利益相关者群体中发生的能力建设过程。为了进行过程评估,使用基于既定能力建设领域的半结构化协议,在 16 个不同的利益相关者群体中记录了 78 次小组会议。为了进行结果评估,对 16 个利益相关者群体中的 16 名促进专家进行了 6 次半结构化访谈(每个环境 1-2 次)。通过内容分析对数据进行了分析。在所有环境中,能力建设过程在一定程度上取得了成功(例如,问题评估、资源动员)。然而,在大多数群体中,很难广泛评估问题,建立可持续的网络,或找到具有领导能力的人。此外,不规则的参与、缺乏承担责任的动机以及对结构和人员变革的最小机构准备,常常阻碍了项目的进展。利益相关者群体可以积极让环境成员参与制定身体活动促进计划。然而,要持续建立能够在没有促进专家协助的情况下独立工作的此类群体似乎具有挑战性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7904/8672937/54a01132ecc5/daab165f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7904/8672937/54a01132ecc5/daab165f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7904/8672937/54a01132ecc5/daab165f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Capacity building in participatory stakeholder groups: results from a German research consortium on active lifestyles.参与式利益相关者群体的能力建设:德国积极生活方式研究联盟的成果。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Dec 13;36(Supplement_2):ii65-ii78. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab165.
2
Capacity Building in Community Stakeholder Groups for Increasing Physical Activity: Results of a Qualitative Study in Two German Communities.社区利益相关者群体在提高身体活动水平方面的能力建设:在两个德国社区进行的定性研究的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 30;17(7):2306. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072306.
3
How Health Promoters Can Assess Capacity Building Processes in Setting-Based Approaches-Development and Testing of a Monitoring Instrument.健康促进者如何评估基于场所的方法中的能力建设过程——监测工具的开发和测试。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 8;17(2):407. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020407.
4
ACTION for Men: Study Protocol of a Community Capacity Building Intervention to Develop and Implement Gender-Sensitive Physical Activity Programs for Men 50 Plus.男性行动:一项社区能力建设干预研究方案,旨在为 50 岁以上男性开发和实施性别敏感的体育活动项目。
Front Public Health. 2020 Jan 24;8:4. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00004. eCollection 2020.
5
Building community capacity to stimulate physical activity and dietary behavior in Dutch secondary schools: Evaluation of the FLASH intervention using the REAIM framework.构建社区能力,以激发荷兰中学的身体活动和饮食行为:使用 REAIM 框架评估 FLASH 干预。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 3;10:926465. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.926465. eCollection 2022.
6
Background and evaluation design of a community-based health-promoting school intervention: Fit Lifestyle at School and at Home (FLASH).背景与基于社区的促进健康学校干预的评价设计:学校与家庭健康促进生活方式(FLASH)。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 20;19(1):784. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7088-3.
7
Japan as the front-runner of super-aged societies: Perspectives from medicine and medical care in Japan.日本作为超老龄化社会的领跑者:来自日本医学与医疗护理的视角
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Jun;15(6):673-87. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12450. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
8
Physical activity promotion in German vocational education: does capacity building work?德国职业教育中的体育活动推广:能力建设有效吗?
Health Promot Int. 2020 Dec 1;35(6):1577-1589. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa014.
9
Evaluating the implementation of the SWITCH® school wellness intervention and capacity-building process through multiple methods.通过多种方法评估 SWITCH® 学校健康干预和能力建设过程的实施情况。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Dec 11;17(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01070-y.
10
[Cooperative planning of measures to promote physical activity : New paths for expanding capabilities-results from the Capital4Health research consortium].[促进身体活动措施的合作规划:扩大能力的新途径——首都健康研究联盟的成果]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Feb;64(2):187-198. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03263-z. Epub 2020 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
How to improve the transferability of a 12-week home-space sedentary behaviour intervention for ethnically diverse older adults: a qualitative study protocol of key stakeholder perspectives.如何提高针对不同种族老年人的为期12周的家庭空间久坐行为干预措施的可转移性:一项关于关键利益相关者观点的定性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 17;15(4):e091049. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091049.
2
[Effects of citizen involvement and participation in knowledge processes of integrated municipal health promotion: a systematic scoping review].[公民参与和参与城市综合健康促进知识过程的影响:一项系统的范围综述]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025 Mar;68(3):323-335. doi: 10.1007/s00103-025-04013-9. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Applying systems thinking to knowledge mobilisation in public health.将系统思维应用于公共卫生领域的知识传播。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Nov 17;18(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00600-1.
2
[Childcare Center Characteristics Associated with Children's MVPA: A Multilevel Analysis with Cross-Sectional Data from the QueB 2 Project].[与儿童中等至剧烈身体活动相关的儿童保育中心特征:来自魁北克2项目横断面数据的多层次分析]
Gesundheitswesen. 2021 Nov;83(11):903-909. doi: 10.1055/a-1205-0917. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
3
What do we know about physical activity interventions in vocational education and training? A systematic review.
A pragmatic strength and conditioning intervention for firefighters: Feasibility of the Tactical Athlete Resilience Program (TARP).
消防员实用体能强化干预:战术运动员适应力计划(TARP)的可行性。
Health Promot J Austr. 2023 Feb;34(1):60-69. doi: 10.1002/hpja.656. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
4
Cooperative planning and its utilization in German physical activity promotion: a brief introduction.德国体育活动促进中的合作规划及其应用:简要介绍
Health Promot Int. 2021 Dec 13;36(Supplement_2):ii1-ii7. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab170.
职业教育和培训中的身体活动干预措施我们了解多少?系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 22;20(1):978. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09093-7.
4
Effects of a Participatory School-Based Intervention on Students' Health-Related Knowledge and Understanding.参与式学校干预对学生健康相关知识和理解的影响。
Front Public Health. 2020 Apr 24;8:122. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00122. eCollection 2020.
5
Capacity Building in Community Stakeholder Groups for Increasing Physical Activity: Results of a Qualitative Study in Two German Communities.社区利益相关者群体在提高身体活动水平方面的能力建设:在两个德国社区进行的定性研究的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 30;17(7):2306. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072306.
6
Physical activity promotion in German vocational education: does capacity building work?德国职业教育中的体育活动推广:能力建设有效吗?
Health Promot Int. 2020 Dec 1;35(6):1577-1589. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa014.
7
Implementing Appetite to Play at scale in British Columbia: Evaluation of a Capacity-Building Intervention to Promote Physical Activity in the Early Years.在不列颠哥伦比亚省大规模实施游戏欲:促进幼儿身体活动的能力建设干预措施的评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 11;17(4):1132. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041132.
8
ACTION for Men: Study Protocol of a Community Capacity Building Intervention to Develop and Implement Gender-Sensitive Physical Activity Programs for Men 50 Plus.男性行动:一项社区能力建设干预研究方案,旨在为 50 岁以上男性开发和实施性别敏感的体育活动项目。
Front Public Health. 2020 Jan 24;8:4. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00004. eCollection 2020.
9
Physical Activity Promotion for Apprentices in Nursing Care and Automotive Mechatronics-Competence Counts More than Volume.促进护理和汽车机电一体化学徒的身体活动——能力比数量更重要。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 28;17(3):793. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030793.
10
Implementation of KEIGAAF in Primary Schools: A Mutual Adaptation Physical Activity and Nutrition Intervention.在小学实施 KEIGAAF:一项相互适应的体育活动与营养干预。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 24;17(3):751. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030751.