• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

转移性乳腺癌患者对电子获取扫描结果的看法:混合方法研究

Perspective of Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer on Electronic Access to Scan Results: Mixed-Methods Study.

作者信息

Baun Christina, Vogsen Marianne, Nielsen Marie Konge, Høilund-Carlsen Poul Flemming, Hildebrandt Malene Grubbe

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

OPEN, Odense Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2020 Feb 10;22(2):e15723. doi: 10.2196/15723.

DOI:10.2196/15723
PMID:32039819
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7055828/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient-accessible electronic health records give patients quick and easy access to their health care data, enabling them to view their test results online prior to a clinic visit. Hospital reports can be difficult for patients to understand, however, and can lead to unnecessary anxiety.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the attitudes and experiences of Danish patients with metastatic breast cancer in using electronic health records to view their own scan results.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective mixed-methods study in a sequential design at our institution during 2018. Participants were women with metastatic breast cancer who were having scans every 3 months (combined positron emission tomography and computed tomography or computed tomography alone) to monitor treatment effects. Participants first received an online questionnaire about their knowledge and use of online access to scan results. We then conducted semistructured interviews with 4 women who used the online access to view their scan results.

RESULTS

A total of 46 patients received the questionnaire (median age 66, SD 11.8, range 34-84 years). Of these women, 38 (83%) completed the survey (median age 69, SD 10.7, range 42-84 years). Most patients (34/38) were aware of the opportunity to access their reports online, but only 40% (15/38) used this access to read their scan results. Barriers to online access were (1) anxiety over reading the scan results in the absence of clinician support, and (2) a preference to receive all disease information at their next hospital appointment. The patients who read their scan result found that facilitators were greater transparency and empowerment, and barriers were the consequences of reading bad news, the feeling of dilemma about the access, and the medical terminology.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with metastatic breast cancer generally had a positive attitude toward electronic access to their scan results, and those who used this opportunity played a greater participatory role in their disease and its management. Others described the potential distress this opportunity caused. The study findings suggest that immediate online access to scan results should be available to patients, but it needs a support function alongside that ensures optimal patient care.

摘要

背景

患者可访问的电子健康记录使患者能够快速轻松地获取其医疗保健数据,使他们能够在门诊就诊前在线查看自己的检查结果。然而,医院报告可能让患者难以理解,并可能导致不必要的焦虑。

目的

我们旨在调查丹麦转移性乳腺癌患者使用电子健康记录查看自身扫描结果的态度和体验。

方法

2018年期间,我们在本机构采用顺序设计进行了一项前瞻性混合方法研究。参与者为患有转移性乳腺癌的女性,她们每3个月进行一次扫描(正电子发射断层扫描和计算机断层扫描联合或仅计算机断层扫描)以监测治疗效果。参与者首先收到一份关于其对在线获取扫描结果的了解和使用情况的在线问卷。然后,我们对4名使用在线访问查看其扫描结果的女性进行了半结构化访谈。

结果

共有46名患者收到问卷(中位年龄66岁,标准差11.8,范围34 - 84岁)。在这些女性中,38名(83%)完成了调查(中位年龄69岁,标准差10.7,范围42 - 84岁)。大多数患者(34/38)知道有机会在线访问其报告,但只有40%(15/38)使用此访问方式阅读其扫描结果。在线访问存在的障碍包括:(1)在没有临床医生支持的情况下阅读扫描结果时的焦虑,以及(2)倾向于在下次医院预约时获取所有疾病信息。阅读了扫描结果的患者发现,促进因素是更高的透明度和自主权,而障碍是阅读坏消息的后果、对访问的两难感觉以及医学术语。

结论

转移性乳腺癌患者对电子方式获取其扫描结果总体持积极态度,那些利用此机会的患者在其疾病及其管理中发挥了更大的参与作用。其他人则描述了这个机会带来的潜在困扰。研究结果表明,应向患者提供即时在线获取扫描结果的服务,但同时需要一个支持功能,以确保为患者提供最佳护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a36/7055828/1d2d7074eba2/jmir_v22i2e15723_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a36/7055828/1d2d7074eba2/jmir_v22i2e15723_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a36/7055828/1d2d7074eba2/jmir_v22i2e15723_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Perspective of Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer on Electronic Access to Scan Results: Mixed-Methods Study.转移性乳腺癌患者对电子获取扫描结果的看法:混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Feb 10;22(2):e15723. doi: 10.2196/15723.
2
Patient Use and Experience With Online Access to Electronic Health Records in Norway: Results From an Online Survey.挪威患者使用在线获取电子健康记录的情况及体验:在线调查结果
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Feb 7;22(2):e16144. doi: 10.2196/16144.
3
Patients' Experiences of Accessing Their Electronic Health Records: National Patient Survey in Sweden.患者获取其电子健康记录的体验:瑞典全国患者调查
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Nov 1;20(11):e278. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9492.
4
Dermatopathologists' Experience With and Perceptions of Patient Online Access to Pathologic Test Result Reports.皮肤科病理学家对患者在线获取病理检验结果报告的体验和看法。
JAMA Dermatol. 2020 Mar 1;156(3):320-324. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.4194.
5
Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.早期乳腺癌患者的健康相关生活质量
Dan Med Bull. 2010 Sep;57(9):B4184.
6
Cancer patients' attitudes and experiences of online access to their electronic medical records: A qualitative study.癌症患者对在线获取电子病历的态度和体验:一项定性研究。
Health Informatics J. 2018 Jun;24(2):115-124. doi: 10.1177/1460458216658778. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
7
Users' Experiences With Online Access to Electronic Health Records in Mental and Somatic Health Care: Cross-Sectional Study.用户在精神和躯体保健中在线访问电子健康记录的体验:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 25;25:e47840. doi: 10.2196/47840.
8
The urban underserved: attitudes towards gaining full access to electronic medical records.城市中未得到充分服务的人群:对全面获取电子病历的态度。
Health Expect. 2014 Oct;17(5):724-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00799.x. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
9
Maternity patients' access to their electronic medical records: use and perspectives of a patient portal.产妇获取其电子病历:患者门户网站的使用情况与观点
Health Inf Manag. 2015;44(1):4-11. doi: 10.1177/183335831504400101.
10
Patient Attitudes About Viewing Their Radiology Images Online: Preintervention Survey.患者对在线查看其放射影像的态度:干预前调查
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jul 18;21(7):e12595. doi: 10.2196/12595.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital Health Portals for Individuals Living With or Beyond Cancer: Patient-Driven Scoping Review.面向癌症患者或康复者的数字健康门户网站:患者驱动的范围综述。
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jul 18;11:e72862. doi: 10.2196/72862.
2
Relevant determinants of Dutch patients' informed decision-making and use of online access to medical records.荷兰患者知情决策及使用在线获取病历的相关决定因素。
Health Promot Int. 2025 Jan 17;40(1). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae071.
3
The impact of different radiology report formats on patient information processing: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Electronic health records implementation: an evaluation of information system impact and contingency factors.电子健康记录的实施:信息系统影响及权变因素评估
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Nov;83(11):779-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.06.011. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
2
Predictors and intensity of online access to electronic medical records among patients with cancer.癌症患者在线访问电子病历的预测因素及强度
J Oncol Pract. 2014 Sep;10(5):e307-12. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.001347. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
3
Patient experiences with full electronic access to health records and clinical notes through the My HealtheVet Personal Health Record Pilot: qualitative study.
不同放射学报告格式对患者信息处理的影响:一项系统综述
Eur Radiol. 2025 May;35(5):2644-2657. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11165-w. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
4
Patient and Health Care Provider Perspectives on Patient Access to Test Results via Web Portals: Scoping Review.患者和医疗保健提供者对通过网络门户获取检验结果的看法:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 19;25:e43765. doi: 10.2196/43765.
5
Patient experience of imaging reports: A systematic literature review.患者对影像报告的体验:一项系统的文献综述。
Ultrasound. 2023 Aug;31(3):164-175. doi: 10.1177/1742271X221140024. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
6
The Effects of Online Access to General Practice Medical Records Perceived by Patients: Longitudinal Survey Study.患者对在线获取全科医疗记录的看法的影响:纵向调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 2;25:e47659. doi: 10.2196/47659.
7
Scanxiety among Adults with Cancer: A Scoping Review to Guide Research and Interventions.癌症成年患者的扫描焦虑:一项指导研究与干预的范围综述
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Feb 22;15(5):1381. doi: 10.3390/cancers15051381.
8
Patient online access to general practice medical records: A qualitative study on patients' needs and expectations.患者在线获取全科医疗记录:一项关于患者需求和期望的定性研究。
Health Inf Manag. 2024 Sep;53(3):166-173. doi: 10.1177/18333583221144666. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
通过“我的健康卫士”个人健康记录试点项目让患者全面电子访问健康记录和临床笔记的体验:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Mar 27;15(3):e65. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2356.
4
The challenges in making electronic health records accessible to patients.使电子健康记录可供患者使用所面临的挑战。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jan-Feb;19(1):116-20. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000261. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
5
The anxious wait: assessing the impact of patient accessible EHRs for breast cancer patients.焦急的等待:评估可让患者访问的电子健康记录对乳腺癌患者的影响。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010 Sep 1;10:46. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-46.
6
Understanding the support needs of patients accessing test results online. PHRs offer great promise, but support issues must be addressed to ensure appropriate access.了解在线获取检测结果的患者的支持需求。个人健康记录前景广阔,但必须解决支持问题以确保适当获取。
J Healthc Inf Manag. 2010 Winter;24(1):57-63.
7
Exploring patient involvement in healthcare decision making across different education and functional health literacy groups.探讨不同教育程度和功能性健康素养群体中患者在医疗决策中的参与情况。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Dec;69(12):1805-12. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.056. Epub 2009 Oct 19.
8
Patient accessible electronic health records: exploring recommendations for successful implementation strategies.患者可访问的电子健康记录:探索成功实施策略的建议。
J Med Internet Res. 2008 Oct 31;10(4):e34. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1061.
9
Towards consumer-friendly PHRs: patients' experience with reviewing their health records.迈向对消费者友好的个人健康记录:患者查看其健康记录的体验。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007 Oct 11;2007:399-403.
10
Early experiences with personal health records.个人健康记录的早期经历。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Jan-Feb;15(1):1-7. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2562. Epub 2007 Oct 18.