Hulsegge Gerben, van Mechelen Willem, Paagman Heleen, Proper Karin I, Anema Johannes R
Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, TNO, Schipholweg 77-89, 2316 ZL, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2020 Aug;93(6):697-705. doi: 10.1007/s00420-020-01519-4. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the moderating role of lifestyle, age, and years working in shifts and, shift work and being overweight.
Cross-sectional data were used of 2569 shift and 4848 non-shift production workers who participated between 2013 and 2018 in an occupational health check. Overweight (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m) was calculated using measured weight and height; lifestyle was assessed by questionnaires. Multiple-adjusted logistic regression with interaction terms between shift work and potential moderators assessed multiplicative interaction; the relative excess risk due to interaction assessed additive interaction (synergism).
Shift work was significantly related to being overweight (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.33 1.76). The strength of this association did not differ by level of sleep quality, fruit and vegetable intake, and physical activity (p ≥ 0.05). Additive and multiplicative interaction by smoking status was present (p < 0.01), with a stronger relationship between shift work and being overweight among non-smokers compared to smokers. Older age as well as more years of exposure to shift work were, independently from each other, related to a stronger relationship between shift work and being overweight (multiplicative interaction p < 0.05).
Shift work was to a similar extent related to being overweight among those with a healthy and unhealthy lifestyle. This does, however, not imply that shift workers can behave unhealthy without any harm. Based on the evident health benefits of a healthy lifestyle, it is still recommended to get sufficient quality of sleep and to meet the recommended level of daily physical activity and, fruit and vegetable intake.
本研究旨在调查生活方式、年龄和轮班工作年限的调节作用与轮班工作和超重之间的关系。
使用了2013年至2018年期间参加职业健康检查的2569名轮班生产工人和4848名非轮班生产工人的横断面数据。超重(BMI≥25kg/m)通过测量的体重和身高计算得出;生活方式通过问卷调查进行评估。采用多因素调整的逻辑回归分析,纳入轮班工作与潜在调节因素之间的交互项,以评估相乘交互作用;通过交互作用导致的相对超额风险评估相加交互作用(协同作用)。
轮班工作与超重显著相关(OR=1.53,95%CI为1.33至1.76)。这种关联的强度在睡眠质量、水果和蔬菜摄入量以及身体活动水平方面没有差异(p≥0.05)。吸烟状况存在相加和相乘交互作用(p<0.01),与吸烟者相比,非吸烟者中轮班工作与超重之间的关系更强。年龄较大以及轮班工作年限较长,彼此独立地与轮班工作和超重之间更强的关系相关(相乘交互作用p<0.05)。
在生活方式健康和不健康的人群中,轮班工作与超重的关联程度相似。然而,这并不意味着轮班工人可以不健康地行事而没有任何危害。基于健康生活方式明显的健康益处,仍建议获得充足的睡眠质量,并达到每日身体活动和水果及蔬菜摄入量的推荐水平。