Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Feb 10;17(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-0916-0.
Interventions to encourage active modes of travel (walking, cycling) may improve physical activity levels, but longitudinal evidence is limited and major change in the built environment / travel infrastructure may be needed. East Village (the former London 2012 Olympic Games Athletes Village) has been repurposed on active design principles with improved walkability, open space and public transport and restrictions on residential car parking. We examined the effect of moving to East Village on adult travel patterns.
One thousand two hundred seventy-eight adults (16+ years) seeking to move into social, intermediate, and market-rent East Village accommodation were recruited in 2013-2015, and followed up after 2 years. Individual objective measures of physical activity using accelerometry (ActiGraph GT3X+) and geographic location using GPS travel recorders (QStarz) were time-matched and a validated algorithm assigned four travel modes (walking, cycling, motorised vehicle, train). We examined change in time spent in different travel modes, using multilevel linear regresssion models adjusting for sex, age group, ethnicity, housing group (fixed effects) and household (random effect), comparing those who had moved to East Village at follow-up with those who did not.
Of 877 adults (69%) followed-up, 578 (66%) provided valid accelerometry and GPS data for at least 1 day (≥540 min) at both time points; half had moved to East Village. Despite no overall effects on physical activity levels, sizeable improvements in walkability and access to public transport in East Village resulted in decreased daily vehicle travel (8.3 mins, 95%CI 2.5,14.0), particularly in the intermediate housing group (9.6 mins, 95%CI 2.2,16.9), and increased underground travel (3.9 mins, 95%CI 1.2,6.5), more so in the market-rent group (11.5 mins, 95%CI 4.4,18.6). However, there were no effects on time spent walking or cycling.
Designing walkable neighbourhoods near high quality public transport and restrictions on car usage, may offer a community-wide strategy shift to sustainable transport modes by increasing public transport use, and reducing motor vehicle travel.
鼓励积极出行方式(步行、骑车)的干预措施可能会提高身体活动水平,但纵向证据有限,并且可能需要对建筑环境/出行基础设施进行重大改变。东村(前伦敦 2012 年奥运会运动员村)按照积极的设计原则进行了重新规划,步行性、开放空间和公共交通得到改善,住宅停车受到限制。我们研究了搬到东村对成年人出行模式的影响。
2013 年至 2015 年,我们招募了 1278 名(16 岁以上)寻求入住社会、中等和市场租金东村住房的成年人,并在 2 年后进行了随访。使用加速度计(ActiGraph GT3X+)进行个体客观的身体活动测量,使用 GPS 出行记录器(QStarz)进行地理位置测量,并使用经过验证的算法将四种出行方式(步行、骑车、机动车、火车)分配给参与者。我们使用多水平线性回归模型调整了性别、年龄组、种族、住房群体(固定效应)和家庭(随机效应),比较了随访时搬到东村的人与未搬到东村的人,以评估不同出行方式的时间变化。
在 877 名(69%)随访的成年人中,有 578 名(66%)至少在两个时间点提供了至少 1 天(≥540 分钟)有效的加速度计和 GPS 数据;其中一半人已经搬到了东村。尽管对身体活动水平没有总体影响,但东村步行性和公共交通可达性的显著改善导致日常汽车出行减少(8.3 分钟,95%CI 2.5,14.0),尤其是在中等住房群体(9.6 分钟,95%CI 2.2,16.9),以及地下出行增加(3.9 分钟,95%CI 1.2,6.5),在市场租金群体中更为明显(11.5 分钟,95%CI 4.4,18.6)。然而,步行和骑车时间没有变化。
在靠近高质量公共交通的地方设计步行友好型社区,并限制汽车使用,可能会通过增加公共交通使用和减少机动车出行,为可持续交通模式提供一种社区范围的策略转变。