Ndarukwa Pisirai, Chimbari Moses John, Sibanda Elopy
1College of Health Sciences, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu Natal, 1st Floor, George Campbell Building, Howard College Campus, UKZN, Durban, 4000 South Africa.
Asthma, Allergy and Immune Dysfunction Clinic, 113 Kwame Nkrumah Ave, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2020 Feb 4;16:10. doi: 10.1186/s13223-020-0405-7. eCollection 2020.
The management of the reversible airways obstruction forms the cornerstone of quality asthma management. The aim of this study was to assess the level of control for asthma in adult patients, using a cross sectional study design. The assessment of control for asthma was based on the ACQ.
We conducted a cross-sectional study to measure the level of control for asthma among patients with asthma who volunteered and were reporting to Chitungwiza Central Hospital. We interviewed and conducted spirometry (lung function testing) on 400 adult patients with asthma. We used the ACQ questions to interview patients. A trained health care provider performed spirometry using the Koko Legend spirometer after meeting all the ambient conditions as outlined in the American Thoracic Society guidelines.
Our study assessed levels of asthma control among 400 adult patients with physician-diagnosed asthma. The results showed that 248 (62%) participants had uncontrolled asthma. The median age of the adult patients who had uncontrolled asthma was 35 years (IQR: 27-44). Using the clinical practice cut-point of 0.75 for controlled asthma, only 152 (38%) were controlled, while 72 (18.8%), 50 (12.5%) and 123 (30.7%) were mildly uncontrolled, moderately uncontrolled and very uncontrolled respectively. Among participants who were widowed had uncontrolled asthma (p = 0.003) while most of the married 103 (67.8%) had controlled asthma (p = 0.018). The findings of the study showed that all the items on the ACQ were significantly different in asthma mean scores (p ≤ 0.0001).
We concluded that most asthma patients that participated in the study were uncontrolled. We therefore, recommend an evaluation of factors associated with poor asthma control in order to improve asthma care and achieve good asthma control outcomes.
可逆性气道阻塞的管理是优质哮喘管理的基石。本研究旨在采用横断面研究设计评估成年哮喘患者的哮喘控制水平。哮喘控制评估基于哮喘控制问卷(ACQ)。
我们进行了一项横断面研究,以测量自愿到奇通圭扎中心医院就诊的哮喘患者的哮喘控制水平。我们对400名成年哮喘患者进行了访谈并进行了肺功能测定(肺功能测试)。我们使用ACQ问题对患者进行访谈。一名经过培训的医护人员在满足美国胸科学会指南中概述的所有环境条件后,使用科科传奇肺功能仪进行肺功能测定。
我们的研究评估了400名经医生诊断为哮喘的成年患者的哮喘控制水平。结果显示,248名(62%)参与者的哮喘未得到控制。哮喘未得到控制的成年患者的中位年龄为35岁(四分位间距:27 - 44岁)。使用哮喘控制的临床实践切点值0.75,只有152名(38%)患者得到控制,而72名(18.8%)、50名(12.5%)和123名(30.7%)患者分别为轻度未控制、中度未控制和重度未控制。在丧偶的参与者中,哮喘未得到控制(p = 0.003),而大多数已婚者103名(67.8%)的哮喘得到控制(p = 0.018)。研究结果表明,ACQ上的所有项目在哮喘平均得分上均有显著差异(p≤ 0.0001)。
我们得出结论,参与研究的大多数哮喘患者未得到控制。因此,我们建议评估与哮喘控制不佳相关的因素,以改善哮喘护理并实现良好的哮喘控制效果。