• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声与胸部X线用于确认中心静脉导管尖端位置的比较。

Comparison between ultrasound and chest X-ray to confirm central venous catheter tip position.

作者信息

de Man Leoni, Wentzel Mari, van Rooyen Cornel, Turton Edwin

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.

Department of Clinical Imaging Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.

出版信息

SA J Radiol. 2023 Jun 29;27(1):2587. doi: 10.4102/sajr.v27i1.2587. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.4102/sajr.v27i1.2587
PMID:37416693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10319935/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mechanical central venous catheter (CVC) placement complications are mostly malposition or iatrogenic pneumothorax. Verification of catheter position by chest X-ray (CXR) is usually performed postoperatively.

OBJECTIVES

This prospective observational study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of peri-operative ultrasound and a 'bubble test' to detect malposition and pneumothorax.

METHOD

Sixty-one patients undergoing peri-operative CVC placement were included. An ultrasound protocol was used to directly visualise the CVC, perform the 'bubble test' and assess for the presence of pneumothorax. The time from agitated saline injection to visualisation of microbubbles in the right atrium was evaluated to determine the correct position of the CVC. The time required to perform the ultrasound assessment was compared to that of conducting the CXR.

RESULTS

Chest X-ray identified 12 (19.7%) malpositions while ultrasound identified 8 (13.1%). Ultrasound showed a sensitivity of 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72 to 0.93) and a specificity of 0.5 (95% CI: 0.16 to 0.84). The positive and negative predictive values were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.80 to 0.98) and 0.33 (95% CI: 0.10 to 0.65), respectively. No pneumothorax was identified on ultrasound and CXR. The median time for ultrasound assessment was significantly shorter at 4 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 3-6 min), compared to performing a CXR that required a median time of 29 min (IQR: 18-56 min) ( < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that ultrasound produced a high sensitivity and moderate specificity in detecting CVC malposition.

CONTRIBUTION

Ultrasound can improve efficiency when used as a rapid bedside screening test to detect CVC malposition.

摘要

背景

中心静脉导管(CVC)置入的机械性并发症主要是位置不当或医源性气胸。通常在术后通过胸部X线(CXR)检查来验证导管位置。

目的

本前瞻性观察性研究评估了围手术期超声和“气泡试验”检测导管位置不当和气胸的诊断准确性。

方法

纳入61例接受围手术期CVC置入的患者。采用超声方案直接观察CVC,进行“气泡试验”并评估气胸情况。评估从注入搅拌生理盐水到右心房出现微气泡的时间,以确定CVC的正确位置。将进行超声评估所需的时间与进行CXR的时间进行比较。

结果

胸部X线检查发现12例(19.7%)位置不当,而超声检查发现8例(13.1%)。超声检查的敏感性为0.85(95%置信区间[CI]:0.72至0.93),特异性为0.5(95%CI:0.16至0.84)。阳性和阴性预测值分别为0.92(95%CI:0.80至0.98)和0.33(95%CI:0.10至0.65)。超声和CXR均未发现气胸。超声评估的中位时间明显更短,为4分钟(四分位间距[IQR]:3 - 6分钟),而进行CXR的中位时间为29分钟(IQR:18 - 56分钟)(<0.0001)。

结论

本研究表明,超声在检测CVC位置不当方面具有较高的敏感性和中等特异性。

贡献

超声作为一种快速的床旁筛查试验用于检测CVC位置不当时,可提高效率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06c6/10319935/d457b029b8da/SAJR-27-2587-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06c6/10319935/e57ecebc47d3/SAJR-27-2587-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06c6/10319935/0d8fb4649a8f/SAJR-27-2587-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06c6/10319935/9d653e8ab7b3/SAJR-27-2587-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06c6/10319935/d457b029b8da/SAJR-27-2587-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06c6/10319935/e57ecebc47d3/SAJR-27-2587-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06c6/10319935/0d8fb4649a8f/SAJR-27-2587-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06c6/10319935/9d653e8ab7b3/SAJR-27-2587-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06c6/10319935/d457b029b8da/SAJR-27-2587-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison between ultrasound and chest X-ray to confirm central venous catheter tip position.超声与胸部X线用于确认中心静脉导管尖端位置的比较。
SA J Radiol. 2023 Jun 29;27(1):2587. doi: 10.4102/sajr.v27i1.2587. eCollection 2023.
2
Bedside ultrasound to detect central venous catheter misplacement and associated iatrogenic complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.床边超声检测中心静脉导管位置不当及相关医源性并发症:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2018 Mar 13;22(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-1989-x.
3
Confirmation of correct central venous catheter position in the preoperative setting by echocardiographic "bubble-test".术前通过超声心动图“气泡试验”确认中心静脉导管位置正确。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2015 Sep;81(9):989-1000. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
4
Central vascular catheter placement evaluation using saline flush and bedside echocardiography.使用生理盐水冲洗和床旁超声心动图评估中心血管导管置入情况。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Jan;21(1):65-72. doi: 10.1111/acem.12283.
5
Prospective comparison of ultrasound and CXR for confirmation of central vascular catheter placement.超声与胸部X线用于确认中心血管导管置入位置的前瞻性比较。
Emerg Med J. 2016 Mar;33(3):176-80. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2015-205000. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
6
Point-of-care Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheter Confirmation in Ultrasound Nonexperts.非超声专家的床旁超声引导中心静脉导管确认
AEM Educ Train. 2020 Oct 13;5(3):e10530. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10530. eCollection 2021 Jul.
7
Ultrasound to Detect Central Venous Catheter Placement Associated Complications: A Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study.超声检测中心静脉导管置管相关并发症:一项多中心诊断准确性研究。
Anesthesiology. 2020 Apr;132(4):781-794. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003126.
8
Clinical Practices in Central Venous Catheter Mechanical Adverse Events.中心静脉导管机械性不良事件的临床实践
J Intensive Care Med. 2022 Sep;37(9):1215-1222. doi: 10.1177/08850666221076798. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
9
The bubble study: ultrasound confirmation of central venous catheter placement.气泡研究:中心静脉导管置入的超声确认
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar;33(3):315-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.10.010. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
10
A Simple and Safe Method for Checking the Position of Central Venous Catheters-A New and Reliable Threshold for Right Atrial Swirl Sign in Microbubbles Tests.一种简单安全的中心静脉导管位置检查方法——微泡试验中右心房漩涡信号的新可靠阈值
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 14;13(6):1657. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061657.

引用本文的文献

1
Rare Central Venous Catheter Malpositions: A Case Series.罕见的中心静脉导管位置异常:病例系列
Cureus. 2024 Jul 4;16(7):e63872. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63872. eCollection 2024 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Mechanical complications after central venous catheterisation in the ultrasound-guided era: a prospective multicentre cohort study.超声引导时代下中心静脉置管后的机械性并发症:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2022 Dec;129(6):843-850. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.08.036. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
2
Emergency and critical care providers' perception about the use of bedside ultrasound for confirmation of above-diaphragm central venous catheter placement.急诊与重症护理人员对使用床旁超声确认膈上中心静脉导管置入的看法。
Heliyon. 2020 Jan 7;6(1):e03113. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03113. eCollection 2020 Jan.
3
Ultrasound to Detect Central Venous Catheter Placement Associated Complications: A Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study.
超声检测中心静脉导管置管相关并发症:一项多中心诊断准确性研究。
Anesthesiology. 2020 Apr;132(4):781-794. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003126.
4
Central venous catheter tip position on chest radiographs.胸部X光片上中心静脉导管尖端位置
Anaesthesia. 2020 Jan;75(1):124-125. doi: 10.1111/anae.14894.
5
Tension Pneumothorax after Attempting Insertion of a Central Venous Catheter.尝试插入中心静脉导管后发生张力性气胸。
Acute Crit Care. 2018 Nov;33(4):280-281. doi: 10.4266/acc.2017.00598. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
6
The electrocardiographic method for positioning the tip of central venous access device.用于确定中心静脉通路装置尖端位置的心电图方法。
J Vasc Access. 2020 Sep;21(5):589-595. doi: 10.1177/1129729819874986. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
7
Ultrasound Guidance for Central Venous Access: Current Evidence and Clinical Recommendations.超声引导下的中心静脉置管:当前证据和临床建议。
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Mar;35(3):303-321. doi: 10.1177/0885066619868164. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
8
A checklist to improve the quality of central venous catheter tip positioning.提高中心静脉导管尖端定位质量的检查表。
Anaesthesia. 2019 Jul;74(7):896-903. doi: 10.1111/anae.14679. Epub 2019 May 6.
9
The "rapid atrial swirl sign" for assessing central venous catheters: Performance by medical residents after limited training.评估中心静脉导管的“快速心房涡流征”:经过有限培训的住院医师的表现。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 16;13(7):e0199345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199345. eCollection 2018.
10
Bedside ultrasound to detect central venous catheter misplacement and associated iatrogenic complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.床边超声检测中心静脉导管位置不当及相关医源性并发症:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2018 Mar 13;22(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-1989-x.