• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Risk factors for delay in surgery for patients undergoing elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.择期行颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术患者手术延迟的危险因素。
J Spine Surg. 2019 Dec;5(4):475-482. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.10.09.
2
The 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) predicts adverse outcomes after elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).五因素改良衰弱指数(mFI-5)可预测选择性颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)后的不良结局。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2024 Mar 1;18:100318. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100318. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Quality analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the outpatient versus inpatient setting: analysis of 7288 patients from the NSQIP database.门诊与住院环境下颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的质量分析:来自NSQIP数据库的7288例患者分析
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Dec;39(6):E9. doi: 10.3171/2015.9.FOCUS15335.
4
Relationship Between ASA Scores and 30-Day Readmissions in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.接受颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术患者的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分与30天再入院率之间的关系
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Jan 15;42(2):85-91. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001680.
5
Ambulatory anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is associated with a higher risk of revision surgery and perioperative complications: an analysis of a large nationwide database.门诊前路颈椎间盘切除术和融合术与更高的翻修手术和围手术期并发症风险相关:一项基于大型全国性数据库的分析。
Spine J. 2018 Jul;18(7):1180-1187. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.11.012. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
6
Thirty-day readmission and reoperation rates after single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus those after cervical disc replacement.单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术与颈椎间盘置换术后的30天再入院率和再次手术率比较。
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Feb;42(2):E6. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.FOCUS16407.
7
National outcomes following single-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.单节段颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的全国性疗效对比
J Spine Surg. 2017 Dec;3(4):641-649. doi: 10.21037/jss.2017.12.04.
8
Four-level anterior versus posterior cervical fusions: Perioperative outcomes and five-year reoperation rates: Outcomes after four-level anterior versus posterior cervical procedures.四级颈椎前路融合术与后路融合术:围手术期结果及五年再次手术率:四级颈椎前路与后路手术的结果
N Am Spine Soc J. 2022 Mar 24;10:100115. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2022.100115. eCollection 2022 Jun.
9
The Impact of Non-Elective Admission on Cost of Care and Length of Stay in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.非选择性入院对颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术护理成本和住院时间的影响:一项倾向匹配分析
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Nov 15;46(22):1535-1541. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004127.
10
Retrospective single-surgeon study of 1123 consecutive cases of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a comparison of clinical outcome parameters, complication rates, and costs between outpatient and inpatient surgery groups, with a literature review.对1123例连续的颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术病例进行的单外科医生回顾性研究:门诊手术组与住院手术组临床结果参数、并发症发生率及费用的比较,并附文献综述
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Jun;28(6):630-641. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.SPINE17938. Epub 2018 Mar 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and efficacy of day anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedure for degenerative cervical spondylosis: a retrospective analysis.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术治疗退行性颈椎病的安全性和有效性:回顾性分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Mar 19;25(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07356-7.
2
Do Osteobiologics Augment Fusion in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery Performed With Mechanical Interbody Devices (Polyether ether ketone, Carbon Fiber, Metal Cages) and is the Fusion Rate Comparable to that With Autograft? A Systematic Review.在使用机械椎间融合器(聚醚醚酮、碳纤维、金属融合器)进行的颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合手术中,骨生物制剂是否能增强融合效果,其融合率与自体骨移植相比是否相当?一项系统评价。
Global Spine J. 2024 Feb;14(2_suppl):24S-33S. doi: 10.1177/21925682231188626.
3
Development of a Machine Learning-Based Prognostic Model for Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Using Nine-Gene Expression Signature.使用九基因表达特征开发基于机器学习的激素受体阳性乳腺癌预后模型
World J Oncol. 2023 Oct;14(5):406-422. doi: 10.14740/wjon1700. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
4
Incidence, etiology and time course of delays to adult spinal deformity surgery: a single-center experience.成人脊柱畸形手术延迟的发生率、病因和时间进程:单中心经验。
Spine Deform. 2023 Jul;11(4):1019-1026. doi: 10.1007/s43390-023-00658-1. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
5
Extended length of stay in diabetic octogenarians following revision total hip arthroplasty.糖尿病八旬患者行全髋关节翻修术后住院时间延长。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 May;33(4):1217-1222. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03277-0. Epub 2022 May 10.
6
COVID-19: Moral and Ethical Implications for Orthopaedic Spine Surgeons.新冠病毒病:对骨科脊柱外科医生的道德与伦理影响
Case Rep Orthop. 2021 Jul 15;2021:6682705. doi: 10.1155/2021/6682705. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Metabolic Syndrome and 30-Day Outcomes in Elective Lumbar Spinal Fusion.代谢综合征与择期腰椎融合术后 30 天结局
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 May 1;43(9):661-666. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002397.
2
Risk Factors for and Complications After Surgical Delay in Elective Single-Level Lumbar Fusion.择期单节段腰椎融合术后手术延迟的风险因素和并发症。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Feb 1;43(3):228-233. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002282.
3
Outpatient Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: An Analysis of Readmissions from the New Jersey State Ambulatory Services Database.门诊前路颈椎间盘切除融合术:基于新泽西州门诊服务数据库的再入院分析。
Int J Spine Surg. 2017 Jan 10;11(1):3. doi: 10.14444/4003. eCollection 2017.
4
Incidence of and Preoperative Risk Factors for Surgical Delay in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Analysis From the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.初次全髋关节置换术中手术延迟的发生率及术前危险因素:来自美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划的分析
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Nov;31(11):2432-2436. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.054. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
5
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: The Surgical Learning Curve.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术:手术学习曲线
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Oct 15;41(20):1580-1585. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001588.
6
Preoperative Risk Factors for, and Incidence of Delayed Surgery in Elective Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty After Hospital Admission: The ACS-NSQIP.择期初次全膝关节置换术入院后延迟手术的术前危险因素及发生率:美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jul;31(7):1413-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.04.047. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
7
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the outpatient ambulatory surgery setting compared with the inpatient hospital setting: analysis of 1000 consecutive cases.门诊日间手术环境下与住院环境下的颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术:1000例连续病例分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jun;24(6):878-84. doi: 10.3171/2015.8.SPINE14284. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
8
Quality analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the outpatient versus inpatient setting: analysis of 7288 patients from the NSQIP database.门诊与住院环境下颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的质量分析:来自NSQIP数据库的7288例患者分析
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Dec;39(6):E9. doi: 10.3171/2015.9.FOCUS15335.
9
The Charlson comorbidity index can be used prospectively to identify patients who will incur high future costs.查尔森合并症指数可用于前瞻性地识别未来将产生高额费用的患者。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 3;9(12):e112479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112479. eCollection 2014.
10
Emergency surgery pre-operative delays - realities and economic impacts.急诊手术术前延误——现实与经济影响。
Int J Surg. 2014 Dec;12(12):1333-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.10.002. Epub 2014 Nov 4.

择期行颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术患者手术延迟的危险因素。

Risk factors for delay in surgery for patients undergoing elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

作者信息

Renfree Sean P, Makovicka Justin L, Chung Andrew S

机构信息

Duke University Graduate School, Durham, NC, USA.

Orthopedic Surgery Residency, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

出版信息

J Spine Surg. 2019 Dec;5(4):475-482. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.10.09.

DOI:10.21037/jss.2019.10.09
PMID:32042998
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6989940/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is well-tolerated by most patients and commonly necessitates only a short hospital admission. Surgical delay after hospital admission, however, may result in longer hospital stays, consequently increasing hospital resource utilization. The current study evaluates risk factors for surgical delay in patients undergoing elective ACDF.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of ACS-NSQIP data from 2006-2015 was performed. Patients undergoing elective ACDF were selected using current procedural terminology (CPT) codes (22251, 22252, 22554). A surgical delay was defined as surgery that occurred one day or later after initial hospital admission. Differences in outcomes between the non-delayed and delayed cohorts were evaluated with univariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for surgical delay.

RESULTS

There were a total of 771 (2.0%) surgical delays out of 39,371 patients undergoing elective ACDF from 2006-2015. Multivariate analysis found partially dependent functional status (OR 5.88; 95% CI: 4.48-7.71; P<0.001), totally dependent functional status (OR 18.22; 95% CI: 9.60-34.59; P<0.001), ASA class 4 (OR 2.73; 95% CI: 1.70-4.38; P<0.001), bleeding disorders (OR 1.75; 95% CI: 1.08-2.85; P=0.024), male sex (OR 1.19; 95% CI: 1.03-1.38; P=0.019), and chronic steroid use (OR 1.76; 95% CI: 1.30-2.37; P<0.001) as independent predictors of delay. Univariate analysis found surgical delay was associated with a higher rate of post-operative major adverse events (4.8% 1.1%; P<0.001), mortality (1.0% 0.2%; P<0.001) and greater than five-fold increase in total length of stay (9.52 1.65 days; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Impaired pre-operative functional status, a higher comorbidity burden, and chronic steroid use are risk factors for surgical delay, increased complications, and length of stay in patients undergoing elective ACDF. This is helpful information to consider given a rising incidence of cervical fusions in the Medicare population, a wide variation in costs, and increasing popularity of bundled-payment models.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

摘要

背景

大多数患者对颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)耐受性良好,通常只需短期住院。然而,入院后手术延迟可能导致住院时间延长,从而增加医院资源利用。本研究评估择期ACDF患者手术延迟的风险因素。

方法

对2006年至2015年美国外科医师协会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据进行回顾性分析。使用当前程序术语(CPT)编码(22251、22252、22554)选择择期ACDF患者。手术延迟定义为初次入院一天或更晚进行的手术。采用单因素分析评估非延迟组和延迟组之间的结果差异。进行多因素逻辑回归以确定手术延迟的风险因素。

结果

2006年至2015年,39371例择期ACDF患者中共有771例(2.0%)发生手术延迟。多因素分析发现部分依赖功能状态(比值比[OR]5.88;95%置信区间[CI]:4.48 - 7.71;P<0.001)、完全依赖功能状态(OR 18.22;95% CI:9.60 - 34.59;P<0.001)、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级4级(OR 2.73;95% CI:1.70 - 4.38;P<0.001)、出血性疾病(OR 1.75;95% CI:1.08 - 2.85;P = 0.024)、男性(OR 1.19;95% CI:1.03 - 1.38;P = 0.019)和长期使用类固醇(OR 1.76;95% CI:1.30 - 2.37;P<0.001)是延迟的独立预测因素。单因素分析发现手术延迟与术后严重不良事件发生率较高(4.8%对1.1%;P<0.001)、死亡率(1.0%对0.2%;P<0.001)以及住院总时长增加超过五倍(9.52天对1.65天;P<0.001)相关。

结论

术前功能状态受损、较高的合并症负担和长期使用类固醇是择期ACDF患者手术延迟、并发症增加和住院时间延长的风险因素。鉴于医疗保险人群中颈椎融合术发病率上升、成本差异巨大以及捆绑支付模式日益普及,这是需要考虑的有用信息。

证据级别

3级