Department of Psychology, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, QC, H4B 1R6, Canada.
Department of Psychology, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, QC, H4B 1R6, Canada.
Behav Res Ther. 2020 Mar;126:103574. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2020.103574. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
Fear of acting on unwanted impulses (e.g., stabbing a loved one) and avoidance of threatening stimuli (e.g., knives) are common phenomena in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Cognitive models of OCD suggest that maladaptive beliefs underlie the development and maintenance of symptoms. The goal of this experiment was to determine whether beliefs about losing control over one's behaviour lead to experiencing anxiety and intrusive thoughts while approaching stimuli that are commonly feared in OCD, and to behaving more cautiously while interacting with the stimuli. Undergraduate participants (N = 128) were provided with false feedback about the meaning of their intrusive thoughts: "having intrusive thoughts means that you are likely to lose control over your behaviour" versus "intrusive thoughts are normal". Participants were then asked to approach sharp knives in a stepwise manner (i.e., behavioural approach test; BAT). Afterwards, they sorted the stimuli in a knife block as quickly as possible. Participants with higher (versus lower) beliefs about losing control experienced significantly increasing anxiety throughout the BAT. They also remembered experiencing more intrusive thoughts throughout the protocol and perceived themselves as less cautious while sorting the knives. Interestingly, objective measures of intrusive thoughts and caution were not significantly different between conditions.
对不受控制的冲动行为(例如,刺伤所爱的人)的恐惧和对威胁性刺激(例如,刀具)的回避是强迫症(OCD)的常见现象。OCD 的认知模型表明,适应不良的信念是症状发展和维持的基础。本实验的目的是确定对失去对行为的控制的信念是否会导致在接近 OCD 中常见的恐惧刺激时产生焦虑和侵入性思维,并在与刺激互动时表现出更谨慎的行为。为 128 名大学生参与者提供了关于侵入性思维含义的虚假反馈:“有侵入性思维意味着你很可能会失去对行为的控制”与“侵入性思维是正常的”。然后,要求参与者以逐步的方式接近锋利的刀具(即行为接近测试;BAT)。之后,他们尽快将刺激物分类到刀块中。与控制感较低的参与者相比,控制感较高的参与者在整个 BAT 过程中经历了明显增加的焦虑。他们还回忆说,在整个实验过程中经历了更多的侵入性思维,并认为自己在分类刀具时不够谨慎。有趣的是,条件之间的侵入性思维和谨慎的客观测量没有显著差异。