Kim Jae-Hong, Han Jae-Young, Song Min-Keun, Park Gwang-Cheon, Lee Jeong-Soon
Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, DongShin University, Naju City 58245, Korea.
Clinical Research Center, DongShin University Gwangju Korean Medicine Hospital, 141, Wolsan-ro, Nam-gu, Gwangju City 61619, Korea.
Brain Sci. 2020 Feb 7;10(2):87. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10020087.
This study investigated the synergistic effects of scalp acupuncture (SA) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), known to be effective for cerebral infarction. This outcome-assessor-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial included a per-protocol analysis to compare the efficacy of SA and electromagnetic convergence stimulation (SAEM-CS) and single or no stimulation. The trial was conducted with 42 cerebral infarction patients (control group, 12; SA group, 11; rTMS group, 8; SAEM-CS group, 11). All patient groups underwent two sessions of CSRT per day. SA, rTMS, and SAEM-CS were conducted once per day, 5 days per week, for 3 weeks. The primary outcome was evaluated using the Fugl-Mayer assessment (FMA). FMA Upper Extremity, FMA total, MBI, and FIM scores significantly increased in the rTMS group compared with the control group. Additionally, FMA Upper Extremity, FMA total, MBI and FIM scores significantly increased in the rTMS group compared with the SAEM-CS group. However, there were no significant changes in the SA or SAEM-CS groups. In conclusion, low-frequency rTMS in the contralesional hemisphere may have long-term therapeutic effects on upper extremity motor function recovery and improvements in activities of daily living. SAEM-CS did not show positive synergistic effects of SA and rTMS.
本研究调查了头皮针(SA)与重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)的协同效应,已知二者对脑梗死有效。这项由结果评估者设盲的随机对照临床试验纳入了一项符合方案分析,以比较SA与电磁融合刺激(SAEM-CS)以及单次刺激或无刺激的疗效。该试验纳入了42例脑梗死患者(对照组12例;SA组11例;rTMS组8例;SAEM-CS组11例)。所有患者组每天接受两次连续慢速率疗法(CSRT)。SA、rTMS和SAEM-CS每周进行5天,每天1次,共3周。主要结局采用Fugl-Mayer评估量表(FMA)进行评估。与对照组相比,rTMS组的FMA上肢评分、FMA总分、改良巴氏指数(MBI)和功能独立性测量量表(FIM)评分显著增加。此外,与SAEM-CS组相比,rTMS组的FMA上肢评分、FMA总分、MBI和FIM评分也显著增加。然而,SA组和SAEM-CS组无显著变化。总之,对侧半球低频rTMS可能对上肢运动功能恢复和日常生活活动改善具有长期治疗效果。SAEM-CS未显示出SA与rTMS的积极协同效应。