Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
National Institute for Health Research Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 10;10(2):e036758. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036758.
Poor diet is a leading risk factor for non-communicable diseases and costs the National Health Service £5.8 billion annually. Product placement strategies used extensively in food outlets, like supermarkets, can influence customers' preferences. Policy-makers, including the UK Government, are considering legislation to ensure placement strategies promote healthier food purchasing and dietary habits. High-quality scientific evidence is needed to inform future policy action. This study will assess whether healthier placement strategies in supermarkets improve household purchasing patterns and the diets of more than one household member.
This natural experiment, with a prospective matched controlled cluster design, is set in discount supermarkets across England. The primary objective is to investigate whether enhanced placement of fresh fruit and vegetables improves household-level purchasing of these products after 6 months. Secondary objectives will examine: (1) differences in intervention effects on purchasing by level of educational attainment, (2) intervention effects on the dietary quality of women and their young children, (3) intervention effects on store-level sales of fruit and vegetables and (4) cost-effectiveness of the intervention from individual, retailer and societal perspectives. Up to 810 intervention and 810 control participants will be recruited from 18 intervention and 18 matched control stores. Eligible participants will be women aged 18-45 years, who hold a loyalty card and shop in a study store. Each control store will be matched to an intervention store on: (1) sales profile, (2) neighbourhood deprivation and (3) customer profile. A detailed process evaluation will assess intervention implementation, mechanisms of impact and, social and environmental contexts.
Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Southampton, Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee (ID 20986.A5). Primary, secondary and process evaluation results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals and shared with policy-makers.
NCT03573973; Pre-results.
不良饮食是导致非传染性疾病的主要风险因素,每年给国民保健制度造成 58 亿英镑的损失。超市等食品销售点广泛使用的产品定位策略会影响顾客的偏好。包括英国政府在内的政策制定者正在考虑立法,以确保定位策略能够促进更健康的食品购买和饮食习惯。需要高质量的科学证据来为未来的政策行动提供信息。这项研究将评估超市中更健康的产品定位策略是否能改善家庭购买模式和不止一位家庭成员的饮食。
这项自然实验采用前瞻性匹配对照群集设计,在英格兰的折扣超市进行。主要目的是调查强化新鲜水果和蔬菜的陈列是否能在 6 个月后改善家庭对这些产品的购买。次要目标将包括:(1)不同教育程度对购买的干预效果差异,(2)对女性及其幼儿饮食质量的干预效果,(3)对商店层面水果和蔬菜销售的干预效果,以及(4)从个人、零售商和社会角度来看干预措施的成本效益。将从 18 个干预商店和 18 个匹配的对照商店中招募最多 810 名干预组和 810 名对照组的参与者。合格的参与者将是年龄在 18-45 岁之间的女性,她们持有会员卡并在研究商店购物。每个对照商店将根据以下三个方面与一个干预商店相匹配:(1)销售情况,(2)社区贫困程度,(3)顾客特征。一项详细的过程评估将评估干预措施的实施、影响机制以及社会和环境背景。
南安普敦大学医学院伦理委员会(ID 20986.A5)已批准这项研究。主要、次要和过程评估结果将提交给同行评审的科学期刊发表,并与政策制定者分享。
NCT03573973;预结果。