Packmor Florian, Klinner Thomas, Woodworth Bradley K, Eikenaar Cas, Schmaljohann Heiko
1Institute of Avian Research "Vogelwarte Helgoland", An der Vogelwarte 21, 26386 Wilhelmshaven, Germany.
2School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Deiniol Road, Bangor, LL57 2UW UK.
Mov Ecol. 2020 Feb 7;8:6. doi: 10.1186/s40462-020-0193-1. eCollection 2020.
Songbirds following distinct migration strategies (e.g. long- vs. short- to medium-distance migrants) often differ in their speed of migration during autumn and, thus, are assumed to face different time constraints. During migration, most songbird species alternate migratory flights with stopover periods. Many of them restrict these migratory flights to the night, i.e., they are nocturnal migrants. At stopover, nocturnal migrants need to select a specific night (night-to-night decision) and time of night (within-night decision) to resume migration. These departure decisions, which largely determine the speed of migration, are jointly affected by a set of intrinsic and extrinsic factors, i.e., departure cues. Here we aim to assess whether the set of intrinsic and extrinsic factors and the magnitude of their respective effects on stopover departure decisions differs between nocturnally migrating songbird species, depending on their migration strategy and associated time constraints.
We radio-tracked migrating Northern Wheatears (; long-distance migrant), European robins () and Common Blackbirds (; both medium-distance migrants) during autumn stopover and analysed their night-to-night and within-night departure timing in relation to intrinsic and extrinsic factors.
Species generally differed in their departure timing on both temporal scales, with shortest stopovers and earliest nocturnal departures in the long-distance migrant. Some factors, such as day of year, fuel load, cloud cover and crosswind, had consistent effects on stopover departure decisions in all three species. However, species differed in the effects of tailwind assistance, change in atmospheric pressure and air temperature on their stopover departure decisions. Whereas night-to-night decisions were affected by these extrinsic factors in either both or one of the medium-distance migrants, such effects were not found in the long-distance migrant.
Our results suggest that the general timing of departures in songbirds is affected by the species-specific migration strategy and associated time constraints. Further, they imply that the assessment and usage of specific extrinsic factors, i.e., weather conditions, as departure cues is adjusted based on this migration strategy, with the long-distance migrants being least selective at departure. Other intrinsic and extrinsic factors, however, seem to be used as departure cues independent of migration strategy.
遵循不同迁徙策略的鸣禽(例如长距离与短至中距离迁徙者)在秋季的迁徙速度往往不同,因此被认为面临不同的时间限制。在迁徙过程中,大多数鸣禽物种会在迁徙飞行和中途停留期之间交替。它们中的许多将这些迁徙飞行限制在夜间,即它们是夜间迁徙者。在中途停留时,夜间迁徙者需要选择特定的夜晚(夜对夜决策)和夜间时间(夜间内决策)来恢复迁徙。这些出发决策在很大程度上决定了迁徙速度,它们共同受到一组内在和外在因素(即出发线索)的影响。在这里,我们旨在评估内在和外在因素的集合及其对中途停留出发决策的各自影响程度在夜间迁徙的鸣禽物种之间是否存在差异,这取决于它们的迁徙策略和相关的时间限制。
我们在秋季中途停留期间对迁徙的白斑黑石鵖(长距离迁徙者)、欧歌鸫()和乌鸫(均为中距离迁徙者)进行无线电追踪,并分析它们与内在和外在因素相关的夜对夜和夜间内出发时间。
在两个时间尺度上,物种的出发时间一般都有所不同,长距离迁徙者的中途停留时间最短,夜间出发最早。一些因素,如一年中的日期、能量储备、云量和侧风,对所有三个物种的中途停留出发决策都有一致的影响。然而,顺风辅助、大气压力变化和气温对它们中途停留出发决策的影响在物种之间存在差异。虽然夜对夜决策在两个中距离迁徙者中的一个或两个中受到这些外在因素的影响,但在长距离迁徙者中未发现此类影响。
我们的结果表明,鸣禽出发的总体时间受到物种特定的迁徙策略和相关时间限制的影响。此外,这意味着对特定外在因素(即天气条件)作为出发线索的评估和使用是根据这种迁徙策略进行调整的,长距离迁徙者在出发时的选择性最低。然而,其他内在和外在因素似乎被用作与迁徙策略无关的出发线索。