Wang Qinmei, Huang Yingying, Gao Rongrong, Chen Hao, Song Benhao, Tu Ruixue, Zhao Yune, McAlinden Colm, Huang Jinhai
From the School of Ophthalmology and Optometry and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, (Wang, Huang, Gao, Chen, Song, Tu, Zhao, McAlinden, Huang), and Key Laboratory of Vision Science, Ministry of Health P.R. China, Wenzhou, (Wang, Huang, Gao, Chen, Zhao, Huang), Zhejiang, China, and Department of Ophthalmology, Singleton Hospital, Swansea Bay University Health Board (McAlinden), Swansea, United Kingdom.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Mar;46(3):360-364. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000072.
To evaluate axial length (AL) measurements and detection rates using a swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometer (OA-2000) compared with the IOLMaster, LENSTAR, and ultrasound (US) measurements in eyes with vitreous hemorrhage.
Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, China.
Comparative evaluation of a diagnostic test or technology.
Patients were adults with vitreous hemorrhage in one or both eyes. Lens Opacities Classification System III was used to determine they type and severity of cataract and the Forrester system was used to classify the grade of vitreous hemorrhage. The AL measurement was taken with the OA-2000, IOLMaster (v5.4), and LENSTAR (v2.1), and with US (Axis-II). The Bland-Altman test was used to assess the agreement between devices.
Forty eyes were scanned with each of the 4 biometers. For Forrester grade III, the detection rate was 100%, 41.7%, and 41.7% with the OA-2000, IOLMaster, and LENSTAR, respectively. For Forrester grades I and II, the detection rate was 46.4%, 3.57%, and 3.57% with the OA-2000, IOLMaster, and LENSTAR, respectively. The detection rate with US was 100% for all grades. The Bland-Altman limits of agreement between the 4 biometers indicated an excellent agreement: OA-2000 vs IOLMaster (95% limits of agreement -0.15 to 0.05 mm), OA-2000 vs LENSTAR (-0.04 to 0.12 mm), and OA-2000 vs US (-0.3 to 0.56 mm).
In vitreous hemorrhage, the detection rate with the SS-OCT OA-2000 biometer was better than that with the IOLMaster and LENSTAR. In cases in which all biometers were able to acquire an AL measurement an excellent agreement was found.
比较扫频光学相干断层扫描(SS-OCT)生物测量仪(OA-2000)与IOLMaster、LENSTAR及超声(US)测量玻璃体出血患眼眼轴长度(AL)的测量值及检出率。
中国温州医科大学附属眼视光医院。
诊断试验或技术的比较评估。
患者为单眼或双眼玻璃体出血的成年人。采用晶状体混浊分级系统III确定白内障的类型和严重程度,采用福雷斯特系统对玻璃体出血的等级进行分类。使用OA-2000、IOLMaster(v5.4)、LENSTAR(v2.1)及US(Axis-II)测量AL。采用Bland-Altman检验评估各设备之间的一致性。
4种生物测量仪分别对40只眼进行扫描。对于福雷斯特III级,OA-2000、IOLMaster及LENSTAR的检出率分别为100%、41.7%和41.7%。对于福雷斯特I级和II级,OA-2000、IOLMaster及LENSTAR的检出率分别为46.4%、3.57%和3.57%。US对所有等级的检出率均为100%。4种生物测量仪之间的Bland-Altman一致性界限显示出极好的一致性:OA-2000与IOLMaster(95%一致性界限为-0.15至0.05mm),OA-2000与LENSTAR(-0.04至0.12mm),OA-2000与US(-0.3至0.56mm)。
在玻璃体出血的情况下,SS-OCT OA-2000生物测量仪的检出率优于IOLMaster和LENSTAR。在所有生物测量仪均能获得AL测量值的情况下,一致性良好。