Larouche François, Tedjar Farouk, Amouzegar Kamyab, Houlachi Georges, Bouchard Patrick, Demopoulos George P, Zaghib Karim
Center of Excellence in Transportation Electrification and Energy Storage (CETEES), Hydro-Québec, 1806, Lionel-Boulet Blvd., Varennes, QC J3X 1S1, Canada.
Mining and Materials Engineering, McGill University, 3610 University Street, Montréal, QC H3A 0C5, Canada.
Materials (Basel). 2020 Feb 10;13(3):801. doi: 10.3390/ma13030801.
An exponential market growth of Li-ion batteries (LIBs) has been observed in the past 20 years; approximately 670,000 tons of LIBs have been sold in 2017 alone. This trend will continue owing to the growing interest of consumers for electric vehicles, recent engagement of car manufacturers to produce them, recent developments in energy storage facilities, and commitment of governments for the electrification of transportation. Although some limited recycling processes were developed earlier after the commercialization of LIBs, these are inadequate in the context of sustainable development. Therefore, significant efforts have been made to replace the commonly employed pyrometallurgical recycling method with a less detrimental approach, such as hydrometallurgical, in particular sulfate-based leaching, or direct recycling. Sulfate-based leaching is the only large-scale hydrometallurgical method currently used for recycling LIBs and serves as baseline for several pilot or demonstration projects currently under development. Conversely, most project and processes focus only on the recovery of Ni, Co, Mn, and less Li, and are wasting the iron phosphate originating from lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries. Although this battery type does not dominate the LIB market, its presence in the waste stream of LIBs causes some technical concerns that affect the profitability of current recycling processes. This review explores the current processes and alternative solutions to pyrometallurgy, including novel selective leaching processes or direct recycling approaches.
在过去20年中,锂离子电池(LIBs)在市场上呈指数级增长;仅在2017年就售出了约67万吨锂离子电池。由于消费者对电动汽车的兴趣日益浓厚、汽车制造商近期开始涉足电动汽车生产、储能设施的最新发展以及各国政府对交通运输电气化的承诺,这一趋势将持续下去。尽管在锂离子电池商业化之后,早期就开发了一些有限的回收工艺,但在可持续发展的背景下,这些工艺还不够完善。因此,人们已做出巨大努力,用危害较小的方法(如湿法冶金,特别是基于硫酸盐的浸出法或直接回收法)取代常用的火法冶金回收方法。基于硫酸盐的浸出法是目前唯一用于回收锂离子电池的大规模湿法冶金方法,也是目前正在开发的几个试点或示范项目的基准方法。相反,大多数项目和工艺只专注于回收镍、钴、锰,回收锂的较少,并且浪费了来自磷酸铁锂(LFP)电池的磷酸铁。尽管这种电池类型在锂离子电池市场中并不占主导地位,但它在锂离子电池废物流中的存在引发了一些技术问题,影响了当前回收工艺的盈利能力。本综述探讨了当前的工艺以及火法冶金的替代解决方案,包括新型选择性浸出工艺或直接回收方法。