Suppr超能文献

[橄榄叶提取物和蜂胶与阿昔洛韦对单纯疱疹病毒1型的抗病毒效果比较]

[Comparison of Antiviral Effect of Olive Leaf Extract and Propolis with Acyclovir on Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1].

作者信息

Altındiş Mustafa, Aslan Ferhat Gürkan, Uzuner Hüseyin, Ünal Havva, Köroğlu Mehmet, Kulaç Sedat, Karadenizli Aynur

机构信息

Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Microbiology, Sakarya, Turkey.

Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, Medical Microbiology Laboratory, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Mikrobiyol Bul. 2020 Jan;54(1):79-94. doi: 10.5578/mb.69019.

Abstract

While acyclovir, a nucleoside analogue, is widely used for herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), emergence of drug-resistant viruses due to frequent usage of this class of medicines, and their toxic side effects require exploring novel active molecules. Despite the studies on developing synthetic molecules in medical sciences and pharmacology, herbs as a natural source of biologically-active compounds remain popular. In this in vitro study, olive leaf extract (OLE) and propolis alone or in combination with acyclovir were investigated for their antiviral efficacy in HSV-1.Toxic doses of OLE, propolis, and dimethyl sulfoxide, propolis diluent, for Hep-2 (ATCC, CCL-23) cells were determined by conventional cell culture. Using "endpoint" method, the viral dose infecting half of the cell culture (TCID50) was calculated, and viral quantity was determined with Spearman-Karber method. Antiviral effects of OLE and propolis on HSV-1 were investigated by conventional cell culture and real-time cell analysis (RTCA). Combinations of the two extracts with one another and with acyclovir were evaluated by RTCA. Active substances prepared at three different dilutions were added to tubes with HSV-1 of logTCID50: 11.5 in descending order starting from the highest non-toxic concentration, and they were left at room temperature for two different durations (one hour and three hours). The aliquots taken from the tubes were cultured in plates containing Hep-2 cells and evaluated after 72 hours. Combinations of extracts and acyclovir at concentrations at least four times lower than the lowest concentration showing antiviral efficacy against HSV-1 were cultured with Hep-2 cells in the e-plates of the xCELLigence RTCA device, measurements were obtained at 30 minute intervals, and data were recorded in real time. In the test with two different durations and at different concentrations of OLE and propolis, antiviral efficacy was observed both with one-hour and three-hour incubation at a concentration of 10 μg/ ml for propolis and 1.2 mg/ml for OLE with RTCA. The duration and concentration of the greatest decrease in viral quantity were in the first one hour and 10 μg/ml for propolis, and in the first one hour and 1.2 mg/ ml for OLE. Combination of propolis and OLE with acyclovir caused no cytopathic effects, and the combination of extracts led to delayed cytopathic effect. According to these results, propolis and OLE, alone and in combinations with acyclovir, have antiviral efficacy against HSV-1. These agents may reduce the dose and side effects of acyclovir in case of co-administration since they exert their effects through a different mechanism than acyclovir,possibly through direct virucidal activity, inhibition of virus internalization or viral inhibition in early stages of replication (inhibition of adsorption/binding of viral particles to the cell). These extracts that do not require conversion to active form have the potential to reduce infectivity in oral lesions, prevent spread, and be used in the topical treatment of acyclovir-resistant HSV infections, particularly in immunocompromised patients. However, in vivo studies should be conducted to determine their medicinal properties and potential toxicities. These results should be supported by further comprehensive studies and the efficacy against other viruses should also be investigated.

摘要

虽然核苷类似物阿昔洛韦被广泛用于治疗1型单纯疱疹病毒(HSV - 1),但由于这类药物的频繁使用导致耐药病毒的出现,且其有毒副作用,因此需要探索新型活性分子。尽管医学和药理学领域一直在研究合成分子,但草药作为生物活性化合物的天然来源仍然很受欢迎。在这项体外研究中,对橄榄叶提取物(OLE)和蜂胶单独或与阿昔洛韦联合使用时对HSV - 1的抗病毒功效进行了研究。通过传统细胞培养确定了OLE、蜂胶以及蜂胶稀释剂二甲基亚砜对Hep - 2(美国典型培养物保藏中心,CCL - 23)细胞的毒性剂量。采用“终点”法计算感染半数细胞培养物的病毒剂量(TCID50),并用Spearman - Karber法测定病毒量。通过传统细胞培养和实时细胞分析(RTCA)研究OLE和蜂胶对HSV - 1的抗病毒作用。通过RTCA评估两种提取物相互之间以及与阿昔洛韦的组合情况。从最高无毒浓度开始,以降序将三种不同稀释度制备的活性物质添加到logTCID50为11.5的HSV - 1试管中,并在室温下放置两个不同的时长(一小时和三小时)。从试管中取出的等分试样接种到含有Hep - 2细胞的培养板中,72小时后进行评估。将浓度至少比显示对HSV - 1有抗病毒功效的最低浓度低四倍的提取物和阿昔洛韦组合,在xCELLigence RTCA设备的e - 培养板中与Hep - 2细胞一起培养,每隔30分钟进行一次测量,并实时记录数据。在对OLE和蜂胶进行两种不同时长以及不同浓度的测试中,使用RTCA观察到,蜂胶浓度为10μg/ml、OLE浓度为1.2mg/ml时,孵育一小时和三小时均具有抗病毒功效。病毒量下降最大的时长和浓度,对于蜂胶是在第一个小时和10μg/ml,对于OLE是在第一个小时和1.2mg/ml。蜂胶和OLE与阿昔洛韦的组合未引起细胞病变效应,提取物组合导致细胞病变效应延迟。根据这些结果,蜂胶和OLE单独以及与阿昔洛韦联合使用时均对HSV - 1具有抗病毒功效。这些药物在联合使用时可能会降低阿昔洛韦的剂量和副作用,因为它们通过与阿昔洛韦不同的机制发挥作用,可能是通过直接杀病毒活性、抑制病毒内化或在复制早期抑制病毒(抑制病毒颗粒吸附/结合到细胞)。这些无需转化为活性形式的提取物有降低口腔病变传染性、防止传播的潜力,可用于局部治疗对阿昔洛韦耐药的HSV感染,尤其是免疫功能低下的患者。然而,需要进行体内研究以确定它们的药用特性和潜在毒性。这些结果应得到进一步全面研究的支持,并且还应研究其对其他病毒的功效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验