The role of causal inference in health services research I: tasks in health services research.
作者信息
Moser André, Puhan Milo A, Zwahlen Marcel
机构信息
Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, 8001, Zurich, Switzerland.
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Mittelstrasse 43, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
出版信息
Int J Public Health. 2020 Mar;65(2):227-230. doi: 10.1007/s00038-020-01333-2. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The role of causal inference in health services research I: tasks in health services research.因果推断在卫生服务研究中的作用I：卫生服务研究中的任务
Int J Public Health. 2020 Mar;65(2):227-230. doi: 10.1007/s00038-020-01333-2. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
2
The role of causal inference in health services research II: a framework for causal inference.因果推断在卫生服务研究中的作用II：因果推断框架
Int J Public Health. 2020 Apr;65(3):367-370. doi: 10.1007/s00038-020-01334-1. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
3
Causal language and strength of inference in academic and media articles shared in social media (CLAIMS): A systematic review.社交媒体分享的学术和媒体文章中的因果语言和推理强度（CLAIMS）：系统评价。
PLoS One. 2018 May 30;13(5):e0196346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196346. eCollection 2018.
4
Real-World Evidence, Causal Inference, and Machine Learning.真实世界证据、因果推理和机器学习。
Value Health. 2019 May;22(5):587-592. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.03.001.
5
Causal learning and inference as a rational process: the new synthesis.因果学习与推理作为一种理性过程：新综合。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:135-63. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131634.
6
Imputation approaches for potential outcomes in causal inference.因果推断中潜在结果的插补方法。
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Oct;44(5):1731-7. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv135. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
7
For and Against Methodologies: Some Perspectives on Recent Causal and Statistical Inference Debates.赞成与反对方法论：对近期因果推断和统计推断争议的一些观点。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2017 Jan;32(1):3-20. doi: 10.1007/s10654-017-0230-6. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
8
Causal inference for clinicians.临床医生的因果推断。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2019 Jun;24(3):109-112. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111069. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
9
Why Causal Inference Matters to Nurses: The Case of Nurse Staffing and Patient Outcomes.为何因果推断对护士至关重要：以护士人员配置与患者结局为例
Online J Issues Nurs. 2016 May 31;21(2):2. doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol21No02Man02.
10
Causal inference and developmental psychology.因果推断与发展心理学。
Dev Psychol. 2010 Nov;46(6):1454-80. doi: 10.1037/a0020204.
引用本文的文献
1
Surgery duration: Optimized prediction and causality analysis.手术时间：优化预测与因果分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 29;17(8):e0273831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273831. eCollection 2022.
2
Megatrends in Healthcare: Review for the Swiss National Science Foundation's National Research Programme 74 (NRP74) "Smarter Health Care".医疗保健的大趋势：为瑞士国家科学基金会的第74号国家研究计划（NRP74）“更智能的医疗保健”所做的综述
Public Health Rev. 2022 Mar 22;43:1604434. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2022.1604434. eCollection 2022.
3
Approach to Human-Centered, Evidence-Driven Adaptive Design (AHEAD) for Health Care Interventions: a Proposed Framework.以人为中心、循证自适应设计（AHEAD）在医疗干预中的应用方法：一个建议框架。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Apr;36(4):1041-1048. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06451-4. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
4
Causal modelling of variation in clinical practice and long-term outcomes of ADHD using Norwegian registry data: the ADHD controversy project.利用挪威登记数据对注意力缺陷多动障碍（ADHD）临床实践中的变异及长期结局进行因果建模：ADHD争议项目
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 19;11(1):e041698. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041698.
5
The role of causal inference in health services research II: a framework for causal inference.因果推断在卫生服务研究中的作用II：因果推断框架
Int J Public Health. 2020 Apr;65(3):367-370. doi: 10.1007/s00038-020-01334-1. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
本文引用的文献
1
The role of causal inference in health services research II: a framework for causal inference.因果推断在卫生服务研究中的作用II：因果推断框架
Int J Public Health. 2020 Apr;65(3):367-370. doi: 10.1007/s00038-020-01334-1. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
2
Defining and measuring health equity in research on task shifting in high-income countries: A systematic review.高收入国家任务转移研究中健康公平的定义与衡量：一项系统综述
SSM Popul Health. 2019 Jan 24;7:100366. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100366. eCollection 2019 Apr.
3
Ensuring Access to Quality Health Care in Vulnerable Communities.确保弱势群体获得高质量的医疗保健服务。
Acad Med. 2018 Sep;93(9):1271-1275. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002254.
4
Healthcare Trends for 2018.2018年医疗保健趋势
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2018 Feb;11(1):48-54.
5
Start With the "C-Word," Follow the Roadmap for Causal Inference.从“因果关系”这个词入手，遵循因果推断的路线图。
Am J Public Health. 2018 May;108(5):621. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304358.
6
Data Are Not Enough-Hurray For Causality!数据不足——因果关系万岁！
Am J Public Health. 2018 May;108(5):622. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304379.
7
The C-Word: The More We Discuss It, the Less Dirty It Sounds.“癌症”这个词：我们讨论得越多，它听起来就不那么忌讳了。
Am J Public Health. 2018 May;108(5):625-626. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304392.
8
Cause and Association: Missing the Forest for the Trees.原因与关联：只见树木不见森林。
Am J Public Health. 2018 May;108(5):620. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304366.
9
Let's Require the "T-Word".让我们使用“T 字”。 （由于原文简短且含义不明，此译文仅基于字面翻译，可能需要更多上下文来准确理解其确切意思。）
Am J Public Health. 2018 May;108(5):624. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304365.
10
Causal Thinking as a Critical Tool for Eliminating Social Inequalities in Health.因果思维作为消除健康领域社会不平等的关键工具。
Am J Public Health. 2018 May;108(5):623. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304383.
Zotero 插件