VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Apr;68(4):725-735. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16346. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
Continuation of aspirin for secondary prevention in persons with limited life expectancy (LLE) is controversial. We sought to determine the incidence and predictors of aspirin discontinuation in veterans with LLE and/or advanced dementia (LLE/AD) who were taking aspirin for secondary prevention at nursing home admission, stratified by whether their limited prognosis (LP) was explicitly documented at admission.
Retrospective cohort study using linked Veterans Affairs (VA) and Medicare clinical/administrative data and Minimum Data Set resident assessments.
All VA nursing homes (referred to as community living centers [CLCs]) in the United States.
Older (≥65 y) CLC residents with LLE/AD, admitted for 7 days or longer in fiscal years 2009 to 2015, who had a history of coronary artery disease and/or stroke/transient ischemic attack, and used aspirin within the first week of CLC admission (n = 13 844).
The primary dependent variable was aspirin discontinuation within the first 90 days after CLC admission, defined as 14 consecutive days of no aspirin receipt. Independent variables included an indicator for explicit documentation of LP, sociodemographics, environment of care characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, bleeding risk factors, individual markers of poor prognosis (eg, cancer, weight loss), and facility characteristics. Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard models with death as a competing risk were used to assess predictors of discontinuation.
Cumulative incidence of aspirin discontinuation was 27% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 26%-28%) in the full sample, 34% (95% CI = 33%-36%) in residents with explicit documentation of LP, and 24% (95% CI = 23%-25%) in residents with no such documentation. The associations of independent variables with aspirin discontinuation differed in residents with vs without explicit LP documentation at admission.
Just over one-quarter of patients discontinued aspirin, possibly reflecting the unclear role of aspirin in end of life among prescribers. Future research should compare outcomes of aspirin deprescribing in this population. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:725-735, 2020.
对于预期寿命有限(LLE)的人,继续使用阿司匹林进行二级预防存在争议。我们旨在确定在疗养院入院时服用阿司匹林进行二级预防且预期寿命有限(LLE)和/或晚期痴呆(LLE/AD)的退伍军人中,阿司匹林停药的发生率和预测因素,并根据其有限的预后(LP)是否在入院时明确记录进行分层。
使用退伍军人事务部(VA)和医疗保险临床/管理数据和最低数据集居民评估进行的回顾性队列研究。
美国所有退伍军人事务部疗养院(称为社区生活中心[CLC])。
在 2009 年至 2015 年的财政年度中,在 CLC 中住院 7 天或更长时间且年龄≥65 岁的 LLE/AD 居民,他们有冠心病和/或中风/短暂性脑缺血发作病史,并且在 CLC 入院后的第一周内使用阿司匹林(n=13844)。
主要依赖变量是 CLC 入院后 90 天内阿司匹林的停药,定义为连续 14 天未服用阿司匹林。自变量包括明确记录 LP、社会人口统计学、护理环境特征、心血管危险因素、出血危险因素、预后不良的个体标志物(如癌症、体重减轻)和设施特征的指标。使用 Fine 和 Gray 亚分布风险模型,以死亡为竞争风险评估停药的预测因素。
在全样本中,阿司匹林停药的累积发生率为 27%(95%置信区间[CI]=26%-28%),在有明确 LP 记录的居民中为 34%(95%CI=33%-36%),在没有此类记录的居民中为 24%(95%CI=23%-25%)。在入院时有无明确 LP 记录的居民中,自变量与阿司匹林停药的关系不同。
超过四分之一的患者停止服用阿司匹林,这可能反映了在生命末期,医生对阿司匹林的作用认识不清。未来的研究应该比较在这一人群中阿司匹林停药的结果。美国老年学会杂志 68:725-735,2020。