Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, Kiel, Germany.
University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 13;15(2):e0228969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228969. eCollection 2020.
There is emerging consensus that Grit's two facets-perseverance of effort and consistency of interest-are best understood as facets of the Big Five dimension of Conscientiousness. However, an in-depth investigation on whether Grit's facet offer any added value over more established facets of Conscientiousness is absent from the literature. In the present study, we investigated whether Grit's facets are empirically distinguishable from three facets of Conscientiousness as conceived in the well-validated Big-Five Inventory 2 (BFI-2), namely, Organization, Responsibility, Productiveness. Moreover, we investigated whether Grit's facets show different (and possibly stronger) associations than the facets of Conscientiousness with a broad set of external criteria (age, educational attainment, monthly income, life satisfaction, mental and physical health, fluid and crystallized intelligence); as well as whether the criterion correlations of Grit's facets are incremental over Conscientiousness. Findings from two latent-variable models in a large and diverse sample (N = 1,244) indicated that the facets of Grit showed moderate to strong relationships related to each other and to the three Conscientiousness facets of the BFI-2 (.41 ≤ r ≤ .94). Grit-Perseverance was almost indistinguishable from the Productiveness facet of Conscientiousness, whereas Grit-Consistency appeared to capture something unique beyond the Conscientiousness facets. The relationships with external criteria of Grit's facets were similar in direction and size to those of the Conscientiousness facets. The results give further purchase to the view that Grit's facets can be subsumed under the Conscientiousness domain.
目前越来越多的共识认为,坚毅的两个方面——努力的毅力和兴趣的稳定性——可以最好地理解为大五人格中的尽责性维度的两个方面。然而,关于坚毅的两个方面是否比尽责性的更成熟方面提供任何附加价值,文献中并没有深入的研究。在本研究中,我们调查了坚毅的两个方面是否可以从大五人格量表 2(BFI-2)中构想的尽责性的三个方面——组织、责任、生产力——中进行经验区分。此外,我们还调查了坚毅的两个方面是否与尽责性的三个方面相比,与广泛的外部标准(年龄、教育程度、月收入、生活满意度、心理和身体健康、流体和晶体智力)有不同(可能更强)的关联;以及坚毅的两个方面的标准相关性是否超过了尽责性。在一个大型和多样化的样本(N=1244)中,两个潜在变量模型的发现表明,坚毅的两个方面表现出中等至强相关,彼此之间以及与 BFI-2 的三个尽责性方面都有相关(.41≤r≤.94)。坚毅的毅力方面几乎与尽责性的生产力方面无法区分,而坚毅的一致性方面似乎捕捉到了超越尽责性方面的独特之处。与外部标准的关系,坚毅的两个方面的方向和大小与尽责性的两个方面相似。这些结果进一步支持了这样一种观点,即坚毅的两个方面可以归入尽责性领域。