Suppr超能文献

同一农场中牛和马的微生物组与病毒组差异。

Differences in microbiome and virome between cattle and horses in the same farm.

作者信息

Park Jongbin, Kim Eun Bae

机构信息

Department of Animal Life Science, College of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea.

Department of Applied Animal Science, College of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea.

出版信息

Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2020 Jun;33(6):1042-1055. doi: 10.5713/ajas.19.0267. Epub 2019 Oct 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The ecosystem of an animal farm is composed of various elements, such as animals, farmers, plants, feed, soil, and microorganisms. A domesticated animal's health is largely connected with the reservoir of bacteria and viruses in animal farms. Although a few studies have focused on exploring the gut microbiome of animals, communities of microbiota and viruses in feedlots have not been thoroughly investigated.

METHODS

Here, we collected feces and dust samples (4 groups: cattle feces, C_F; horse feces, H_F; cattle dust, C_D; and horse dust, H_D) from cattle and horse farms sharing the same housing and investigated their microbiome/virome communities by Illumina sequencing.

RESULTS

Dust groups (C_D and H_D) showed higher microbial diversity than feces groups (C_F and H_F) regardless of animal species. From the microbial community analysis, all the samples from the four groups have major phyla such as Proteobacteria (min 37.1% to max 42.8%), Firmicutes (19.1% to 24.9%), Bacteroidetes (10.6% to 22.1%), and Actinobacteria (6.1% to 20.5%). The abundance of Streptococcus, which commonly recognized as equine pathogens, was significantly higher in the horse group (H_D and H_F). Over 99% among the classified virome reads were classified as Caudovirales, a group of tailed bacteriophages, in all four groups. Foot-and-mouth disease virus and equine adenovirus, which cause deadly diseases in cattle and horse, respectively, were not detected.

CONCLUSION

Our results will provide baseline information to understand different gut and environmental microbial ecology between two livestock species.

摘要

目的

动物养殖场的生态系统由各种元素组成,如动物、养殖者、植物、饲料、土壤和微生物。家畜的健康在很大程度上与养殖场中细菌和病毒的储存库有关。尽管有一些研究专注于探索动物的肠道微生物组,但育肥场中微生物群和病毒群落尚未得到充分研究。

方法

在这里,我们从共用同一畜舍的牛场和马场收集了粪便和灰尘样本(4组:牛粪,C_F;马粪,H_F;牛舍灰尘,C_D;马舍灰尘,H_D),并通过Illumina测序研究了它们的微生物组/病毒组群落。

结果

无论动物种类如何,灰尘组(C_D和H_D)的微生物多样性均高于粪便组(C_F和H_F)。从微生物群落分析来看,四组的所有样本都有主要的门类,如变形菌门(最低37.1%至最高42.8%)、厚壁菌门(19.1%至24.9%)、拟杆菌门(10.6%至22.1%)和放线菌门(6.1%至20.5%)。通常被认为是马病原体的链球菌在马组(H_D和H_F)中的丰度显著更高。在所有四组中,超过99%的分类病毒组读数被分类为有尾噬菌体目,一组有尾噬菌体。未检测到分别在牛和马中引起致命疾病的口蹄疫病毒和马腺病毒。

结论

我们的结果将为了解两种家畜不同的肠道和环境微生物生态提供基线信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c510/7206377/3e2030619433/ajas-19-0267f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验