• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会决定因素与健康:照顾者干预措施系统评价中被低估的异质性。

Social Determinants of Health: Underreported Heterogeneity in Systematic Reviews of Caregiver Interventions.

机构信息

Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California, Davis, Sacramento.

The Valley Foundation School of Nursing, San Jose State University, San Jose, California.

出版信息

Gerontologist. 2020 Feb 14;60(Suppl 1):S14-S28. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz148.

DOI:10.1093/geront/gnz148
PMID:32057083
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7019663/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Although most people have some experience as caregivers, the nature and context of care are highly variable. Caregiving, socioeconomic factors, and health are all interrelated. For these reasons, caregiver interventions must consider these factors. This review examines the degree to which caregiver intervention research has reported and considered social determinants of health.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We examined published systematic reviews and meta-analyses of interventions for older adults with age-related chronic conditions using the PRISMA and AMSTAR 2 checklists. From 2,707 papers meeting search criteria, we identified 197 potentially relevant systematic reviews, and selected 33 for the final analysis.

RESULTS

We found scant information on the inclusion of social determinants; the papers lacked specificity regarding race/ethnicity, gender, sexual identity, socioeconomic status, and geographic location. The majority of studies focused on dementia, with other conditions common in later life vastly underrepresented.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Significant gaps in evidence persist, particularly for interventions targeting diverse conditions and populations. To advance health equity and improve the effectiveness of interventions, research should address caregiver heterogeneity and improve assessment, support, and instruction for diverse populations. Research must identify aspects of heterogeneity that matter in intervention design, while recognizing opportunities for common elements and strategies.

摘要

背景与目的

尽管大多数人都有过照顾他人的经历,但照顾的性质和背景却存在很大差异。照顾、社会经济因素和健康都是相互关联的。基于这些原因,照顾者干预措施必须考虑这些因素。本综述考察了照顾者干预研究报告和考虑健康社会决定因素的程度。

研究设计与方法

我们使用 PRISMA 和 AMSTAR 2 清单检查了针对与年龄相关的慢性病的老年患者的干预措施的已发表系统评价和荟萃分析。在符合搜索标准的 2707 篇论文中,我们确定了 197 篇可能相关的系统评价,并选择了 33 篇进行最终分析。

结果

我们发现有关纳入社会决定因素的信息很少;这些论文缺乏关于种族/族裔、性别、性身份、社会经济地位和地理位置的具体信息。大多数研究都集中在痴呆症上,而其他在晚年中常见的病症则严重代表性不足。

讨论与启示

证据中仍然存在重大差距,特别是针对不同条件和人群的干预措施。为了促进健康公平并提高干预措施的有效性,研究应解决照顾者的异质性问题,并为不同人群提供评估、支持和指导。研究必须确定干预设计中重要的异质因素,同时认识到共同要素和策略的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8d4/7019663/0624f6e41bfb/gnz148f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8d4/7019663/2082e29509a9/gnz148f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8d4/7019663/0624f6e41bfb/gnz148f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8d4/7019663/2082e29509a9/gnz148f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8d4/7019663/0624f6e41bfb/gnz148f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Social Determinants of Health: Underreported Heterogeneity in Systematic Reviews of Caregiver Interventions.社会决定因素与健康:照顾者干预措施系统评价中被低估的异质性。
Gerontologist. 2020 Feb 14;60(Suppl 1):S14-S28. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz148.
2
Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.干预措施对帮助照顾者支持社区中痴呆症患者的有效性:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Jun;6(2):137-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2008.00090.x.
3
A comprehensive meta-review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on nonpharmacological interventions for informal dementia caregivers.对非药物干预非正式痴呆症照顾者的系统评价和荟萃分析的综合元综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Apr 15;20(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01547-2.
4
A systematic review of systematic reviews on interventions for caregivers of people with chronic conditions.对慢性病患者照护者干预措施的系统评价的系统综述。
J Adv Nurs. 2015 Apr;71(4):718-34. doi: 10.1111/jan.12523. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
5
Protocol for a systematic review on interventions for caregivers of persons with mild cognitive impairment and early dementia: does early stage intervention improve caregiver well-being and ability to provide care?针对轻度认知障碍和早期痴呆患者的照顾者干预措施的系统评价方案:早期干预是否能改善照顾者的幸福感和照顾能力?
BMJ Open. 2019 May 10;9(5):e028441. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028441.
6
7
Effect of multicomponent interventions on competence of family caregivers of people with dementia: A systematic review.多组分干预对痴呆患者家庭照顾者能力的影响:系统评价。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 May;27(9-10):1744-1758. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14326. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
8
9
mHealth Interventions to Support Caregivers of Older Adults: Equity-Focused Systematic Review.支持老年人照料者的移动健康干预措施:以公平为重点的系统评价。
JMIR Aging. 2022 Jul 8;5(3):e33085. doi: 10.2196/33085.
10
A meta-review of stress, coping and interventions in dementia and dementia caregiving.关于痴呆症及痴呆症护理中的压力、应对方式和干预措施的元综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2016 May 18;16:106. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0280-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Creating User Personas to Represent the Needs of Dementia Caregivers Who Support Medication Management at Home: Persona Development and Qualitative Study.创建用户角色以代表在家中支持药物管理的痴呆症护理人员的需求:角色开发与定性研究
JMIR Aging. 2025 Jul 25;8:e63944. doi: 10.2196/63944.
2
Informal Care Receiving Among Older Adults: The Role of Multimorbidity and Intersectional Social Position.老年人中的非正式照护接受情况:多重疾病和交叉社会地位的作用
Gerontologist. 2025 Apr 9;65(5). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaf071.
3
Maintaining trust and seeking support: a qualitative study of family caregivers' experiences interacting with health care services for home-dwelling older people with mental health problems.

本文引用的文献

1
Computer and telephone delivered interventions to support caregivers of people with dementia: a systematic review of research output and quality.计算机和电话干预以支持痴呆患者的照顾者:研究产出和质量的系统评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Nov 16;17(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0654-6.
2
AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both.AMSTAR 2:一种用于系统评价的关键评估工具,该系统评价包括医疗保健干预措施的随机或非随机研究,或两者皆有。
BMJ. 2017 Sep 21;358:j4008. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4008.
3
Effectiveness of Interventions for Caregivers of People With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Major Neurocognitive Disorders: A Systematic Review.
维持信任与寻求支持:一项关于家庭照顾者与患有心理健康问题的居家老年人医疗服务互动经历的定性研究
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Feb 28;25(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05781-4.
4
Unpaid caregivers' process of collaborating with others during older adult hospital-to-home transitions: A grounded theory study. unpaid 照护者在老年人从医院到家庭过渡期间与他人合作的过程:扎根理论研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 8;19(11):e0310204. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310204. eCollection 2024.
5
The Saskatchewan Caregiver Experience Study: Support Priorities of Caregivers of Older Adults.萨斯喀彻温省护理人员体验研究:老年人护理人员的支持重点。
Can J Nurs Res. 2024 Dec;56(4):418-431. doi: 10.1177/08445621241273956. Epub 2024 Aug 11.
6
Disparity in the Burden of Caring for Older Persons between Families Living in Housing Estates and Traditional Communities in Thailand.泰国居住在住宅小区的家庭与传统社区家庭在老年人照料负担上的差异。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 May 28;14(6):1514-1526. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14060100.
7
Who do patients depend on as they age and for what medical needs? An exploratory study of Chinese and Latino primary care patients.随着年龄的增长,患者会依赖谁来满足他们的医疗需求?对中国和拉丁裔初级保健患者的探索性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jun 8;25(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02411-7.
8
2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures.2024 年阿尔茨海默病事实和数据。
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 May;20(5):3708-3821. doi: 10.1002/alz.13809. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
9
Integrating Perspectives on Family Caregiving After Critical Illness: A Qualitative Content Analysis.整合危重病后家庭照护的观点:定性内容分析。
Am J Crit Care. 2024 May 1;33(3):180-189. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2024309.
10
Mortality risk following end-of-life caregiving: A population-based analysis of hospice users and their families.临终关怀后死亡风险:基于人群的对临终关怀使用者及其家属的分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 May;348:116781. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116781. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
阿尔茨海默病及相关主要神经认知障碍患者照料者干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价。
Am J Occup Ther. 2017 Sep/Oct;71(5):7105180020p1-7105180020p10. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2017.027581.
4
Cognitive stimulation therapy in dementia care: exploring the views and experiences of service providers on the barriers and facilitators to implementation in practice using Normalization Process Theory.认知刺激疗法在痴呆症护理中的应用:运用常态过程理论,探讨服务提供者对实施过程中障碍和促进因素的看法和经验。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Nov;29(11):1869-1878. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217001272. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
5
Web-based health interventions for family caregivers of elderly individuals: A Scoping Review.针对老年人家庭照顾者的基于网络的健康干预措施:一项范围综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jul;103:109-138. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.04.009. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
6
Keeping the person with dementia and the informal caregiver together: a systematic review of psychosocial interventions.让痴呆症患者与非正式照料者在一起:心理社会干预的系统综述
Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Apr;29(4):583-593. doi: 10.1017/S1041610216002106. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
7
Consistency of dementia caregiver intervention classification: an evidence-based synthesis.痴呆症护理者干预分类的一致性:基于证据的综合分析
Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Jan;29(1):19-30. doi: 10.1017/S1041610216001514. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
8
Interventions to build resilience in family caregivers of people living with dementia: a comprehensive systematic review.增强痴呆症患者家庭照料者复原力的干预措施:一项全面的系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Jun;14(6):238-73. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-002555.
9
A systematic review of the effect of telephone, internet or combined support for carers of people living with Alzheimer's, vascular or mixed dementia in the community.一项关于电话、互联网或综合支持对社区中阿尔茨海默病、血管性痴呆或混合性痴呆患者照料者影响的系统评价。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2016 Sep-Oct;66:218-36. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2016.06.013. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
10
Training programmes for family caregivers of people with dementia living at home: integrative review.针对居家痴呆症患者家庭照护者的培训项目:综合综述
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Oct;25(19-20):2757-67. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13266. Epub 2016 Jun 7.