• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年数字技术使用、感知障碍与代表性样本中的幸福感

Young Adolescents' Digital Technology Use, Perceived Impairments, and Well-Being in a Representative Sample.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.

Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 2020 Apr;219:180-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.12.002. Epub 2020 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.12.002
PMID:32057438
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7570431/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the cross-sectional associations between young adolescents' access, use, and perceived impairments related to digital technologies and their academic, psychological, and physical well-being.

STUDY DESIGN

There were 2104 adolescents (ages 10-15 years), representative of the North Carolina Public School population, who completed questionnaires in 2015. Administrative educational records were linked with parental consent.

RESULTS

Nearly all young adolescents (95%) had Internet access, 67% owned a mobile phone, and 68% had a social media account. Mobile phone ownership was not associated with any indicators of well-being (math and reading test scores, school belonging, psychological distress, conduct problems, or physical health) after controlling for demographic factors. Having a social media account and frequency of social media use were only robustly associated with conduct problems (explaining ∼3% of the variation in conduct problems). Despite the lack of strong associations, 91% of adolescents reported at least 1 perceived technology-related impairment and 29% of adolescents reported online-to-offline spillover of negative experiences. Economically disadvantaged adolescents reported similar access, but greater online-to-offline spillover and stronger associations between social media account ownership and poor psychological well-being compared with their more affluent peers.

CONCLUSIONS

At the population level, there was little evidence that digital technology access and use is negatively associated with young adolescents' well-being. Youth from economically disadvantaged families were equally likely to have access to digital technologies, but were more likely than their more affluent peers to report negative online experiences. Closing the digital divide requires prioritizing equity in experiences and opportunities, as well as in access.

摘要

目的

探讨青少年获取、使用数字技术以及感知数字技术对其学业、心理和身体健康造成的损害与他们的学术、心理和身体健康之间的横断面关联。

研究设计

共有 2104 名青少年(年龄在 10-15 岁之间)参与了 2015 年的问卷调查,这些青少年代表了北卡罗来纳州公立学校的学生群体。行政教育记录与父母同意相关联。

结果

几乎所有的青少年(95%)都可以上网,67%的青少年拥有手机,68%的青少年拥有社交媒体账户。在控制了人口因素后,手机拥有量与任何幸福指标(数学和阅读考试成绩、学校归属感、心理困扰、行为问题或身体健康)均无关联。拥有社交媒体账户和使用社交媒体的频率仅与行为问题显著相关(解释行为问题变化的约 3%)。尽管没有很强的关联,但 91%的青少年报告至少有 1 项感知与技术相关的损害,29%的青少年报告了负面在线体验向线下的溢出。与经济条件较好的同龄人相比,经济条件较差的青少年报告了类似的获取情况,但他们的负面在线体验向线下溢出的情况更多,并且拥有社交媒体账户与较差的心理健康之间的关联更强。

结论

在人群层面上,几乎没有证据表明数字技术的获取和使用与青少年的幸福感呈负相关。来自经济条件较差家庭的青少年同样有可能接触到数字技术,但他们比经济条件较好的同龄人更有可能报告负面的在线体验。缩小数字鸿沟需要优先考虑公平的体验和机会,以及公平的获取途径。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3f3/7570431/81ccfa62c92c/nihms-1560818-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3f3/7570431/7ea38b56d379/nihms-1560818-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3f3/7570431/81ccfa62c92c/nihms-1560818-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3f3/7570431/7ea38b56d379/nihms-1560818-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3f3/7570431/81ccfa62c92c/nihms-1560818-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Young Adolescents' Digital Technology Use, Perceived Impairments, and Well-Being in a Representative Sample.青少年数字技术使用、感知障碍与代表性样本中的幸福感
J Pediatr. 2020 Apr;219:180-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.12.002. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
2
Factors Associated With the Use of Digital Technology Among Youth in Zimbabwe: Findings From a Cross-Sectional Population-Based Survey.津巴布韦青年使用数字技术的影响因素:一项基于人群的横断面调查研究结果
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 23;26:e52670. doi: 10.2196/52670.
3
Adolescents' Digital Technology Interactions and Importance: Associations with Demographics and Social Media Frequency.青少年的数字技术互动和重要性:与人口统计学和社交媒体频率的关联。
J Pediatr. 2021 Sep;236:312-315.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.06.005. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
4
Mobile Phone Access and Implications for Digital Health Interventions Among Adolescents and Young Adults in Zimbabwe: Cross-Sectional Survey.津巴布韦青少年和年轻成人的手机使用情况及其对数字健康干预的影响:横断面调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jan 13;9(1):e21244. doi: 10.2196/21244.
5
Orientations in adolescent use of information and communication technology: a digital divide by sociodemographic background, educational career, and health.青少年信息与通信技术使用的取向:基于社会人口背景、教育经历和健康状况的数字鸿沟
Scand J Public Health. 2007;35(1):95-103. doi: 10.1080/14034940600868721.
6
Technology and Social Media Use Among Patients Enrolled in Outpatient Addiction Treatment Programs: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.参加门诊成瘾治疗项目患者的技术和社交媒体使用情况:横断面调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Mar 6;20(3):e84. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9172.
7
Reciprocal Longitudinal Associations Between Adolescents' Media Consumption and Psychological Health.青少年媒体消费与心理健康的相互纵向关联。
Acad Pediatr. 2019 Jan-Feb;19(1):109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2018.08.009. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
8
The problematic use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in adolescents by the cross sectional JOITIC study.横断面JOITIC研究中青少年对信息通信技术(ICT)的问题性使用。
BMC Pediatr. 2016 Aug 22;16(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12887-016-0674-y.
9
Individual and Parental Factors of Adolescents' mHealth App Use: Nationally Representative Cross-sectional Study.青少年移动健康应用使用的个体和父母因素:全国代表性横断面研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Dec 16;10(12):e40340. doi: 10.2196/40340.
10
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Women's Access to and Interest in mHealth: National Web-based Cross-sectional Survey.原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民妇女对移动医疗的获取和兴趣:全国性网络横断面调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 6;25:e42660. doi: 10.2196/42660.

引用本文的文献

1
Teens, Tech, and Talk: Adolescents' Use of and Emotional Reactions to Snapchat's My AI Chatbot.青少年、科技与交流:青少年对Snapchat的人工智能聊天机器人My AI的使用及情绪反应
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 30;15(8):1037. doi: 10.3390/bs15081037.
2
Technology Effects and Child Health: Wellness Impact and Social Effects (TECHWISE): Protocol for a Prospective, Observational, Real-World Study.技术影响与儿童健康:健康影响和社会效应(TECHWISE):一项前瞻性、观察性、真实世界研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 19;14:e69358. doi: 10.2196/69358.
3
Social media use in adolescents with and without mental health conditions.

本文引用的文献

1
Smartphones are bad for some teens, not all.智能手机对一些青少年有害,但并非对所有青少年都如此。
Nature. 2018 Feb;554(7693):432-434. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-02109-8.
2
Young Adolescents' Digital Technology Use and Mental Health Symptoms: Little Evidence of Longitudinal or Daily Linkages.青少年的数字技术使用与心理健康症状:纵向或日常关联的证据不足。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2019 Nov;7(6):1416-1433. doi: 10.1177/2167702619859336. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
3
The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use.青少年福祉与数字技术使用之间的关系。
有心理健康问题和没有心理健康问题的青少年使用社交媒体的情况。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 May 5. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02134-4.
4
Ten Myths About the Effect of Social Media Use on Well-Being.社交媒体使用对幸福感影响的十大误区。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 25;26:e59585. doi: 10.2196/59585.
5
Review: Preventing Psychopathology in the Digital Age: Leveraging Technology to Target Coping and Emotion Regulation in Adolescents.综述:数字时代预防精神病理学:利用技术针对青少年的应对和情绪调节
JAACAP Open. 2023 Oct 4;2(1):6-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jaacop.2023.09.006. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Smartphone Ownership, Minors' Well-being, and Parental Mediation Strategies. An Analysis in the Context of Social Media Influencers.智能手机拥有、未成年人福祉和父母调解策略。社交媒体影响者背景下的分析。
J Youth Adolesc. 2024 Oct;53(10):2202-2218. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02013-7. Epub 2024 May 23.
7
From "online brains" to "online lives": understanding the individualized impacts of Internet use across psychological, cognitive and social dimensions.从“网络大脑”到“网络生活”:理解互联网使用在心理、认知和社会维度上的个体化影响。
World Psychiatry. 2024 Jun;23(2):176-190. doi: 10.1002/wps.21188.
8
Validation of the Gaming Skills Questionnaire in Adolescence: Effects of Gaming Skills on Cognitive and Affective Functioning.青少年游戏技能问卷的效度验证:游戏技能对认知和情感功能的影响。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 Mar 19;14(3):722-752. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14030048.
9
Conceptualizing the Role of Racial-Ethnic Identity in U.S. Adolescent Social Technology Use and Well-Being.构建种族-民族认同在美国青少年社交技术使用与幸福感中的作用
Transl Issues Psychol Sci. 2023 Sep;9(3):199-215. doi: 10.1037/tps0000372. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
10
Selecting an Ecological Momentary Assessment Platform: Tutorial for Researchers.选择生态瞬时评估平台:研究人员教程。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jan 4;26:e51125. doi: 10.2196/51125.
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Feb;3(2):173-182. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0506-1. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
4
Perceived social status and mental health among young adolescents: Evidence from census data to cellphones.青少年感知社会地位与心理健康:来自人口普查数据到手机的证据。
Dev Psychol. 2019 Mar;55(3):574-585. doi: 10.1037/dev0000551.
5
A Large-Scale Test of the Goldilocks Hypothesis.大规模测试金律假说。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Feb;28(2):204-215. doi: 10.1177/0956797616678438. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
6
The three-factor model of Internet addiction: the development of the Problematic Internet Use Questionnaire.网络成瘾的三因素模型:问题性网络使用问卷的编制
Behav Res Methods. 2008 May;40(2):563-74. doi: 10.3758/brm.40.2.563.
7
The comorbid psychiatric symptoms of Internet addiction: attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), depression, social phobia, and hostility.网络成瘾的共病精神症状:注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)、抑郁症、社交恐惧症和敌意。
J Adolesc Health. 2007 Jul;41(1):93-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.02.002. Epub 2007 Apr 12.
8
Connecting developmental constructions to the internet: identity presentation and sexual exploration in online teen chat rooms.将青少年成长结构与互联网相联系:在线青少年聊天室中的身份呈现与性探索
Dev Psychol. 2006 May;42(3):395-406. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.3.395.
9
Evaluating the impact of interventions in the Multisite Violence Prevention Study: samples, procedures, and measures.评估多地点暴力预防研究中干预措施的影响:样本、程序和测量方法。
Am J Prev Med. 2004 Jan;26(1 Suppl):48-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2003.09.015.
10
Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress.用于监测非特异性心理困扰的人群患病率及趋势的简短筛查量表。
Psychol Med. 2002 Aug;32(6):959-76. doi: 10.1017/s0033291702006074.