• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复杂的医疗管理对高需求、高花费的医疗补助患者的支出和利用的影响。

Impact of complex care management on spending and utilization for high-need, high-cost Medicaid patients.

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02446. Email:

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2020 Feb 1;26(2):e57-e63. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.42402.

DOI:10.37765/ajmc.2020.42402
PMID:32059101
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Complex care management programs have emerged as a promising model to better care for high-need, high-cost patients. Despite their widespread use, relatively little is known about the impact of these programs in Medicaid populations. This study evaluated the impact of a complex care management program on spending and utilization for high-need, high-cost Medicaid patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized quality improvement trial conducted at CareMore Health in Memphis, Tennessee. A total of 253 high-need, high-cost Medicaid patients were randomized in a 1:2 ratio to complex care management or usual care.

METHODS

Intention-to-treat analysis compared regression-adjusted rates of spending and utilization between patients randomized to the complex care program (n = 71) and those randomized to usual care (n = 127) over the 12 months following randomization. Primary outcomes included total medical expenditures (TME) and inpatient (IP) days. Secondary outcomes included IP admission, emergency department (ED) visits, care center visits, and specialist visits.

RESULTS

Compared with patients randomized to usual care, patients randomized to complex care management had lower TME (adjusted difference, -$7732 per member per year [PMPY]; 95% CI, -$14,914 to -$550; P = .036), fewer IP bed days (adjusted difference, -3.46 PMPY; 95% CI, -4.03 to -2.89; P <.001), fewer IP admissions (adjusted difference, -0.32 PMPY; 95% CI, -0.54 to -0.11; P = .014), and fewer specialist visits (adjusted difference, -1.35 PMPY; 95% CI, -1.98 to -0.73; P <.001). There was no significant impact on care center or ED visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Carefully designed and targeted complex care management programs may be an effective approach to caring for high-need, high-cost Medicaid patients.

摘要

目的

复杂的护理管理方案已成为一种有前途的模式,可以更好地为高需求、高费用的患者提供护理。尽管这些方案得到了广泛应用,但对于这些方案在医疗补助人群中的影响,人们知之甚少。本研究评估了一种复杂的护理管理方案对高需求、高费用的医疗补助患者的支出和利用的影响。

研究设计

在田纳西州孟菲斯的 CareMore Health 进行的一项随机质量改进试验。总共将 253 名高需求、高费用的医疗补助患者以 1:2 的比例随机分为复杂护理管理组(n = 71)和常规护理组。

方法

意向治疗分析比较了随机分组至复杂护理方案的患者(n = 71)与随机分组至常规护理的患者(n = 127)在随机分组后 12 个月内的支出和利用回归调整率。主要结局包括总医疗支出(TME)和住院(IP)天数。次要结局包括 IP 入院、急诊就诊、护理中心就诊和专科就诊。

结果

与随机分组至常规护理的患者相比,随机分组至复杂护理管理的患者 TME 较低(调整差异,-7732 美元/人/年[PMPY];95%CI,-14914 美元至-550 美元;P =.036),住院天数较少(调整差异,-3.46 PMPY;95%CI,-4.03 美元至-2.89 美元;P <.001),住院次数较少(调整差异,-0.32 PMPY;95%CI,-0.54 美元至-0.11 美元;P =.014),专科就诊次数较少(调整差异,-1.35 PMPY;95%CI,-1.98 美元至-0.73 美元;P <.001)。护理中心或急诊就诊无显著影响。

结论

精心设计和有针对性的复杂护理管理方案可能是一种有效治疗高需求、高费用医疗补助患者的方法。

相似文献

1
Impact of complex care management on spending and utilization for high-need, high-cost Medicaid patients.复杂的医疗管理对高需求、高花费的医疗补助患者的支出和利用的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2020 Feb 1;26(2):e57-e63. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.42402.
2
Effect of Comprehensive Care Coordination on Medicaid Expenditures Compared With Usual Care Among Children and Youth With Chronic Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.综合护理协调对慢性病儿童和青少年的医疗补助支出的影响与常规护理相比:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1912604. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12604.
3
Effect of Intensive Interdisciplinary Transitional Care for High-Need, High-Cost Patients on Quality, Outcomes, and Costs: a Quasi-Experimental Study.强化跨学科过渡性护理对高需求、高费用患者的质量、结局和成本的影响:一项准实验研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Sep;34(9):1815-1824. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05082-8. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
4
Intensive care management of a complex Medicaid population: a randomized evaluation.对复杂医疗补助人群的重症监护管理:一项随机评估。
Am J Manag Care. 2022 Sep;28(9):430-435. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2022.89219.
5
Impact of a statewide Emergency Department Information Exchange on health care use and expenditures.全州范围的急诊信息交换对医疗保健使用和支出的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun;57(3):603-613. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13963. Epub 2022 Mar 13.
6
Going Beyond Clinical Care to Reduce Health Care Spending: Findings From the J-CHiP Community-based Population Health Management Program Evaluation.超越临床护理,降低医疗保健支出:J-CHiP 基于社区的人群健康管理计划评估结果。
Med Care. 2018 Jul;56(7):603-609. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000934.
7
Trends in Treatment and Spending for Patients Receiving Outpatient Treatment of Depression in the United States, 1998-2015.美国 1998-2015 年接受抑郁症门诊治疗患者的治疗和支出趋势。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Aug 1;76(8):810-817. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0633.
8
Early Performance in Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations: A Comparison of Oregon and Colorado.医疗补助责任医疗组织的早期表现:俄勒冈州与科罗拉多州的比较
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Apr 1;177(4):538-545. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9098.
9
Health Care Utilization and Spending for Children With Mental Health Conditions in Medicaid.医疗补助计划中精神健康状况儿童的医疗保健利用和支出。
Acad Pediatr. 2020 Jul;20(5):678-686. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2020.01.013. Epub 2020 Feb 2.
10
Cost and Utilization Impacts of a Medicaid Managed Care Organization's Behavioral Health Wraparound Program.医疗补助管理式医疗组织的行为健康全覆盖计划的成本和利用影响。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2022 Jul;49(4):658-669. doi: 10.1007/s10488-022-01190-6. Epub 2022 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Care Coordination for High-Need, High-Cost Commercially Insured Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.针对高需求、高成本商业保险患者的护理协调:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2511804. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.11804.
2
Supporting primary care clinicians in caring for patients with alcohol use disorder: study protocol for Records for Alcohol Care Enhancement (RACE), a factorial four-arm randomized trial.支持初级保健临床医生护理酒精使用障碍患者:酒精护理强化记录(RACE)研究方案,一项析因四臂随机试验。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2025 Feb 5;20(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13722-024-00526-x.
3
Screening, treatment, and referral for substance use disorder in Medicaid health homes: Results of a national pilot study.
医疗补助健康之家对物质使用障碍的筛查、治疗及转诊:一项全国性试点研究的结果
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2025 Mar;170:209608. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209608. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
4
Estimating the workload of a multi-disciplinary care team using patient-level encounter histories.利用患者层面的诊疗记录估算多学科护理团队的工作量。
Health Syst (Basingstoke). 2023 Jun 12;13(4):295-315. doi: 10.1080/20476965.2023.2215848. eCollection 2024.
5
Efficacy of extracting and preventively intervening late-stage older adults who are at high risk for spending high medical costs by using the health check-up system in Japan: a pilot study.日本利用健康检查系统对高医疗费用支出高风险晚期老年人进行提取及预防性干预的效果:一项试点研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 27;12:1434800. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1434800. eCollection 2024.
6
Social Risks and Health Care Use in Medically Complex Patients.医疗复杂患者的社会风险与医疗保健使用
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2435199. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.35199.
7
Personalized care for complex lives: initial outcomes of a behaviorally-informed complex care intervention.个性化护理复杂生活:行为信息复杂护理干预的初步结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 6;24(1):898. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11332-1.
8
Prediction of non emergent acute care utilization and cost among patients receiving Medicaid.预测接受医疗补助的患者中不需要紧急护理的利用情况和成本。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 23;14(1):824. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-51114-z.
9
The Camden Coalition Care Management Program Improved Intermediate Care Coordination: A Randomized Controlled Trial.卡姆登联盟关怀管理计划改善了中级医疗协调:一项随机对照试验。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Jan;43(1):131-139. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.01151. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
10
Challenges in predicting future high-cost patients for care management interventions.预测未来需要进行护理管理干预的高费用患者的挑战。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 14;23(1):992. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09957-9.