Department of Psychology; 400 Innovation Drive, Memphis, TN 38111, USA.
University of Virginia School of Medicine; Center for Addiction and Prevention Research; 560 Ray C. Hunt Drive, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
Mil Med. 2020 Jun 8;185(5-6):e609-e615. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaa016.
Military personnel are at high risk for tobacco use, particularly during the first year of military service. Technical Training follows an 8½ week tobacco ban during basic military training and is a vulnerable time for personnel to both reinitiate and initiate tobacco use. Thus, this can be a crucial time to promote tobacco policies and interventions. However, there is limited research examining when, how, and where personnel access tobacco during the first year of service, particularly among users of newer products (eg, electronic cigarettes[e-cigarettes]). Thus, the purpose of the current study is to explore the timing, source, and location of tobacco use during Technical Training across all types of products. Furthermore, this study will examine differences in demographic characteristics and prior tobacco history in relationship to these tobacco behaviors.
Participants were U.S. Air Force recruits completing Technical Training (2017-2018). Protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the 59th Medical Wing of the U.S. Air Force. During the first week of Technical Training, Airmen were consented to participate in the study and completed a questionnaire about demographics and tobacco use history. Next, Airmen were randomized to receive one of three tobacco prevention interventions as part of military training. At a 3-month follow-up, during the last week of Technical Training, consented participants completed a questionnaire about current tobacco use. Airmen reported when (ie, first month vs. after), how (ie, "bummed" from another airman, bought on or off base, received from the internet or event), and where (ie, designated smoking areas on base, off base, bar or club, friend's house, cigar lounge, hookah bar, or vape shop) they used tobacco during Technical Training. Descriptive statistics were used to examine these behaviors across all tobacco products. Additionally, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests compared differences in demographic characteristics and baseline tobacco use in relationship to these tobacco behaviors.
No significant differences were found when comparing prior users and first-time users in relationship to tobacco behaviors during Technical Training; however, significant differences in educational background and age were found in regard to the source and location of tobacco use. Additionally, how and where Airmen first used tobacco during Technical Training differed across products. Cigarettes and smokeless tobacco were equally likely to be bought on or off base and most commonly first used at a designated smoking area on base. However, e-cigarettes, cigarillos/little cigars, and hookah were more likely to be bought off base, and first used at a specialty store (ie, vape shop, hookah bar, or cigar lounge).
Tobacco use behaviors during Technical Training differed depending on the type of product. Specifically, new and emerging products were more likely to be bought off base and first used at a specialty store. Thus, military polices regulating on base tobacco pricing might not reduce the growing prevalence of e-cigarettes. Future policies might consider addressing the density of off-base tobacco retailers to reduce the high rates of tobacco use in this population.
军人有很高的吸烟风险,尤其是在服兵役的第一年。技术培训紧随基础军事训练的 8 周半的禁烟令之后,是人员重新开始和开始吸烟的脆弱时期。因此,这是促进烟草政策和干预措施的关键时期。然而,目前的研究很少探讨人员在服役第一年何时、如何以及从何处获得烟草,特别是在使用较新产品(例如电子烟)的人员中。因此,本研究的目的是探索在所有类型的产品中,技术培训期间吸烟的时间、来源和地点。此外,本研究还将研究人口统计学特征和既往吸烟史与这些吸烟行为之间的关系。
参与者为正在接受技术培训的美国空军新兵(2017-2018 年)。该方案得到了美国空军第 59 医疗联队机构审查委员会的批准。在技术培训的第一周,空军人员同意参加研究,并完成了一份关于人口统计学和吸烟史的问卷。接下来,空军人员被随机分配接受三种烟草预防干预措施中的一种,作为军事训练的一部分。在 3 个月的随访中,即技术培训的最后一周,同意的参与者完成了一份关于当前吸烟情况的问卷。空军人员报告了他们何时(即第一个月与之后)、如何(即从另一名空军人员那里“借”来、在基地内外购买、从互联网或活动中收到)以及何地(即在基地指定的吸烟区、基地外、酒吧或俱乐部、朋友家、雪茄休息室、水烟吧、电子烟店)使用烟草。使用描述性统计数据来检查所有烟草产品中的这些行为。此外,Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney 和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验比较了人口统计学特征和基线吸烟情况与这些吸烟行为的差异。
在技术培训期间,与烟草行为相关的既往使用者和初次使用者之间没有显著差异;然而,在来源和地点的烟草使用方面,教育背景和年龄存在显著差异。此外,空军人员在技术培训期间首次使用烟草的方式和地点因产品而异。香烟和无烟烟草同样可能在基地内外购买,并且最常首先在基地指定的吸烟区使用。然而,电子烟、小雪茄/小雪茄和水烟更有可能在基地外购买,并且首先在专卖店(即电子烟店、水烟吧或雪茄休息室)使用。
技术培训期间的吸烟行为因产品类型而异。具体而言,新出现的产品更有可能在基地外购买,并在专卖店首次使用。因此,监管基地内烟草定价的军事政策可能不会降低电子烟日益普及的趋势。未来的政策可能需要考虑减少基地外烟草零售商的密度,以降低这一人群的高吸烟率。