Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max-Planck-Ring 14, 72076, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Exp Brain Res. 2020 Mar;238(3):699-711. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05745-7. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
Inertial motions may be defined in terms of acceleration and jerk, the time-derivative of acceleration. We investigated the relative contributions of these characteristics to the perceived intensity of motions. Participants were seated on a high-fidelity motion platform, and presented with 25 above-threshold 1 s forward (surge) motions that had acceleration values ranging between 0.5 and 2.5 [Formula: see text] and jerks between 20 and 60 [Formula: see text], in five steps each. Participants performed two tasks: a magnitude estimation task, where they provided subjective ratings of motion intensity for each motion, and a two-interval forced choice task, where they provided judgments on which motion of a pair was more intense, for all possible combinations of the above motion profiles. Analysis of the data shows that responses on both tasks may be explained by a single model, and that this model should include acceleration only. The finding that perceived motion intensity depends on acceleration only appears inconsistent with previous findings. We show that this discrepancy can be explained by considering the frequency content of the motions, and demonstrate that a linear time-invariant systems model of the otoliths and subsequent processing can account for the present data as well as for previous findings.
惯性运动可以根据加速度和急动度(加速度的时间导数)来定义。我们研究了这些特征对运动感知强度的相对贡献。参与者坐在高保真运动平台上,接受了 25 次超过阈值的 1 秒向前(涌动)运动,这些运动的加速度值在 0.5 和 2.5 [公式:见正文]之间,急动度在 20 和 60 [公式:见正文]之间,每个加速度值和急动度值各有 5 个级别。参与者完成了两项任务:一项是幅度估计任务,他们对每个运动的运动强度进行主观评分;另一项是两个间隔强制选择任务,他们对每个运动对中哪一个更强烈进行判断,所有可能的运动轮廓组合都要进行判断。数据分析表明,两个任务的反应都可以用一个单一的模型来解释,而这个模型只应该包括加速度。感知运动强度仅取决于加速度的发现似乎与以前的发现不一致。我们表明,通过考虑运动的频率内容,可以解释这种差异,并证明耳石和随后的处理的线性时不变系统模型可以解释当前的数据以及以前的发现。