• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无牙颌的计算机光学印模制取——一项体内可行性研究。

Computerized optical impression making of edentulous jaws - An in vivo feasibility study.

机构信息

Department of Advanced Oral Sciences and Therapeutics, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, Temple, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Prosthodont Res. 2020 Oct;64(4):444-453. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2019.12.003. Epub 2020 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpor.2019.12.003
PMID:32061572
Abstract

PURPOSE

Within the specialty of prosthodontics, oral impressions are ubiquitous tools utilized to transfer intraoral characteristics such as teeth, implants, and soft tissue into a physical state (stone cast) that is processable in a laboratory setting for the fabrication of dental restorations. In recent years, optical impression systems have become ubiquitous in clinical practice replacing the conventional method of impression making. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of computerized optical impression making of edentulous jaws in an in vivo setting.

METHODS

29 edentulous patients (27 maxillae and five mandibles) underwent conventional impressions as well as computerized optical impressions. The conventional impressions and the resulting stone casts were digitized and superimposed over the computerized/digitized optical impressions in order to obtain information on differences between the two datasets. Statistical analyses were performed to identify relevant deviations.

RESULTS

The overall mean difference between the stone cast, digital scans and the computerized optical scans were 336.7 ± 105.0 µm (n = 32), 363.7 ± 143.1 µm (n = 24), and 272.1 ± 168.5 µm (n = 29), respectively. The visual evaluations revealed highest deviations (≥ 500 µm) in the areas of the soft palate, the sublingual areas, and the vestibule (peripheral seal zone).

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of the present study, the investigated scanners were not able currently to fully replace a conventional impression for the fabrication of a complete denture.

摘要

目的

在修复牙科领域,口腔印模是一种无处不在的工具,用于将牙齿、种植体和软组织等口腔内特征转化为物理状态(石膏模型),以便在实验室环境中进行加工,制作牙科修复体。近年来,光学印模系统在临床实践中已广泛应用,取代了传统的印模制作方法。本研究旨在评估在体内环境下制作无牙颌计算机光学印模的可行性和准确性。

方法

29 名无牙颌患者(27 例上颌和 5 例下颌)接受了传统印模和计算机光学印模。对传统印模和由此产生的石膏模型进行数字化,并与计算机/数字化光学印模叠加,以获取两组数据集之间差异的信息。进行统计分析以确定相关偏差。

结果

石膏模型、数字扫描和计算机光学扫描之间的总体平均差异分别为 336.7±105.0 µm(n=32)、363.7±143.1 µm(n=24)和 272.1±168.5 µm(n=29)。视觉评估显示,在软腭、舌下区和前庭(外周密封区)等区域存在最大偏差(≥500 µm)。

结论

在本研究的限制范围内,所研究的扫描仪目前还不能完全替代传统印模来制作全口义齿。

相似文献

1
Computerized optical impression making of edentulous jaws - An in vivo feasibility study.无牙颌的计算机光学印模制取——一项体内可行性研究。
J Prosthodont Res. 2020 Oct;64(4):444-453. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2019.12.003. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
2
Digital vs Conventional Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Retrospective Analysis of 36 Edentulous Jaws.数字化与传统全牙弓种植印模:对36例无牙颌的回顾性分析
J Prosthodont. 2023 Apr;32(4):325-330. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13536. Epub 2022 May 31.
3
Intraoral optical impression versus conventional impression for fully edentulous maxilla: an in vivo comparative study.全上颌无牙患者口内光学印模与传统印模的比较:一项体内研究。
Int J Comput Dent. 2024 Mar 26;27(1):19-26. doi: 10.3290/j.ijcd.b3916775.
4
Three-dimensional differences between intraoral scans and conventional impressions of edentulous jaws: A clinical study.无牙颌口内扫描与传统印模三维差异的临床研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Feb;123(2):264-268. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 May 29.
5
Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes.无牙患者的数字化与传统种植体印模:准确性结果
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Apr;27(4):465-72. doi: 10.1111/clr.12567. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
6
Accuracy of printed casts generated from digital implant impressions versus stone casts from conventional implant impressions: A comparative in vitro study.数字化种植体印模与传统种植体印模制取石膏模型的精度比较:一项体外研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Aug;29(8):835-842. doi: 10.1111/clr.13297. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
7
Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.全上颌(包括完整牙列和腭部软组织)口内数字化印模的准确性
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 6;11(7):e0158800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158800. eCollection 2016.
8
A comparative clinical study on the transfer accuracy of conventional and digital implant impressions using a new reference key-based method.一种新的基于参考键的方法比较传统和数字种植体印模转移精度的临床研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Apr;32(4):460-469. doi: 10.1111/clr.13715. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
9
Digital Versus Conventional Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Prospective Study on 16 Edentulous Maxillae.数字化全口种植印模与传统全口种植印模:16 例无牙颌上颌的前瞻性研究。
J Prosthodont. 2020 Apr;29(4):281-286. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13162. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
10
A Technique for Digital Impression and Bite Registration for a Single Edentulous Arch.一种用于单个无牙颌的数字化印模和咬合记录技术。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Feb;28(2):e519-e523. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12786. Epub 2018 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Expert consensus on digital restoration of complete dentures.全口义齿数字化修复专家共识
Int J Oral Sci. 2025 Jul 30;17(1):58. doi: 10.1038/s41368-025-00388-2.
2
Accuracy of intraoral scans of the edentulous maxilla - an in vitro study.无牙上颌骨口内扫描的准确性——一项体外研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jun 17;29(7):342. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06419-w.
3
Influence of Pontic Length on the Structural Integrity of Zirconia Fixed Partial Dentures (FPDs).桥体长度对氧化锆固定局部义齿(FPDs)结构完整性的影响。
J Funct Biomater. 2025 Mar 25;16(4):116. doi: 10.3390/jfb16040116.
4
Trueness and precision of complete denture digital impression compared to conventional impression: an study.全口义齿数字印模与传统印模的准确性和精确性比较:一项研究
PeerJ. 2025 Feb 26;13:e19075. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19075. eCollection 2025.
5
Case Report: Accuracy analysis of a new scanning body for intraoral digital impressions in full-arch edentulous patients.病例报告:全口无牙患者口腔内数字化印模新扫描体的准确性分析
Front Oral Health. 2025 Jan 29;6:1528943. doi: 10.3389/froh.2025.1528943. eCollection 2025.
6
The accuracy of edentulous arch impression between intraoral scanner and laboratory scanner: a scoping review.口腔内扫描仪与实验室扫描仪在无牙颌印模方面的准确性:一项范围综述。
BDJ Open. 2025 Feb 13;11(1):13. doi: 10.1038/s41405-025-00300-4.
7
Accuracy of Full-Arch Intraoral Scans Versus Conventional Impression: A Systematic Review with a Meta-Analysis and a Proposal to Standardise the Analysis of the Accuracy.全口内扫描与传统印模的准确性:一项包含荟萃分析的系统评价及准确性分析标准化建议
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 27;14(1):71. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010071.
8
The Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners in Maxillary Defects with Different Model Variations.不同模型变体对上颌骨缺损进行口内扫描的准确性
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 24;14(21):2368. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14212368.
9
Palatal vault configuration and its influence on intraoral scan time and accuracy in completely edentulous arches: a prospective clinical study.腭穹窿形态及其对全口无牙颌口腔内扫描时间和准确性的影响:一项前瞻性临床研究。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2024 Aug;16(4):201-211. doi: 10.4047/jap.2024.16.4.201. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
10
Application of digital impression and model in removable partial dentures for Kennedy classⅠandⅡdentition defects.数字化印模和模型在 Kennedy Ⅰ类和Ⅱ类牙列缺损可摘局部义齿中的应用。
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Aug 1;42(4):481-485. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2024.2024103.