School of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, North Sichuan Medical College, Gaoping District, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, China.
School of Kinesiology and Health, Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 16;18(8):e0290171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290171. eCollection 2023.
Executive function plays an important role in our daily life and can be affected by both single task (acute aerobic exercise or cognitive training) and dual-task (acute motor-cognitive training) interventions. Here we explored the immediate and short-term effect on executive function to texted whether dual-task interventions are more effective at promoting executive function.
Forty-six young men were recruited (mean age: 20.65 years) and assigned randomly to aerobic exercise (n = 15), cognitive training (n = 15), or dual-task (n = 16) groups. Executive functions were assessed before, immediately after, and 30 min after intervention using Go/No-go, 2-back, and More-Odd-Shifting tests.
Working memory function improved after all three interventions (significant Time effect, F(2,86) = 7.05, p = 0.001). Performance on the 2-back test was significantly better immediately after dual-task intervention (p = 0.038) and the response time was shorter (p = 0.023). Performance on the More-Odd-Shifting test improved over time (significant Time effect, F(2,86) = 30.698, p = 0.01), both immediately after the dual-task intervention (p = 0.015), and 30 min later (p = 0.001). Shifting-test performance was also better immediately after (p = 0.005) and 30 min after (p < 0.001) aerobic exercise.
Executive function was enhanced by single-task (acute aerobic exercise or cognitive training) and dual-task interventions. The effect continued for 30 min after both the single-task aerobic exercise and the dual-task intervention. For short-term intervention, the dual-task was not more effective than either of the single tasks.
执行功能在我们的日常生活中起着重要作用,既可以受到单一任务(急性有氧运动或认知训练)的影响,也可以受到双重任务(急性运动认知训练)的影响。在这里,我们探讨了对执行功能的即时和短期影响,以确定双重任务干预是否更有效地促进执行功能。
招募了 46 名年轻男性(平均年龄:20.65 岁),并随机分为有氧运动组(n=15)、认知训练组(n=15)或双重任务组(n=16)。使用 Go/No-go、2-back 和 More-Odd-Shifting 测试在干预前、干预后立即和 30 分钟后评估执行功能。
所有三种干预措施后,工作记忆功能均得到改善(时间效应有统计学意义,F(2,86) = 7.05,p = 0.001)。双重任务干预后立即,2-back 测试的表现明显更好(p = 0.038),反应时间更短(p = 0.023)。More-Odd-Shifting 测试的表现随时间而提高(时间效应有统计学意义,F(2,86) = 30.698,p = 0.01),双重任务干预后立即(p = 0.015)和 30 分钟后(p = 0.001)也是如此。运动任务干预后立即(p = 0.005)和 30 分钟后(p < 0.001)的转换测试表现也更好。
执行功能通过单一任务(急性有氧运动或认知训练)和双重任务干预得到增强。两种单一任务干预后,效果持续 30 分钟。对于短期干预,双重任务并不比任何单一任务更有效。