Department of Internal Medicine Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam The Netherlands.
Department of Epidemiology Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam The Netherlands.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Feb 18;9(4):e014457. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014457. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
Background Sex differences in efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy remain uncertain because of the underrepresentation of women in cardiovascular trials. The aim of this study was to perform a sex-specific analysis of the pooled efficacy and safety data of clinical trials comparing a high potent P2Y inhibitor+aspirin with clopidogrel+aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Methods and Results A systematic literature search was performed. Randomized clinical trials that compared patients following percutaneous coronary intervention/acute coronary syndrome who were taking high potent P2Y inhibitors+aspirin versus clopidogrel+aspirin were selected. Random effects estimates were calculated and relative risks with 95% CIs on efficacy and safety end points were determined per sex. We included 6 randomized clinical trials comparing prasugrel/ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in 43 990 patients (13 030 women), with a median follow-up time of 1.06 years. Women and men had similar relative risk (RR) reduction for major cardiovascular events (women: RR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.80-1.00; men: RR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.79-0.91) ( for interaction=0.39). Regarding safety, women and men had similar risk of major bleeding by high-potency dual antiplatelet therapy (RR, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.98-1.41] versus RR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.93-1.14]) ( for interaction=0.20). Conclusions The small and statistically insignificant difference in efficacy and safety estimates of high-potency dual antiplatelet therapy between women and men following percutaneous coronary intervention/acute coronary syndrome do not justify differential dual antiplatelet therapy treatment for both sexes.
由于心血管试验中女性代表性不足,双重抗血小板治疗的疗效和安全性在性别上的差异仍不确定。本研究旨在对比较急性冠脉综合征患者使用高活性 P2Y 抑制剂+阿司匹林与氯吡格雷+阿司匹林的临床试验的汇总疗效和安全性数据进行性别特异性分析。
进行了系统的文献检索。选择了比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗/急性冠脉综合征后使用高活性 P2Y 抑制剂+阿司匹林与氯吡格雷+阿司匹林的患者的随机临床试验。计算了随机效应估计值,并确定了每个性别疗效和安全性终点的相对风险(RR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。我们纳入了 6 项比较普拉格雷/替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷的随机临床试验,共纳入 43990 例患者(13030 例女性),中位随访时间为 1.06 年。女性和男性主要心血管事件的 RR 降低相似(女性:RR,0.89 [95%CI,0.80-1.00;男性:RR,0.84 [95%CI,0.79-0.91])( 交互检验=0.39)。关于安全性,女性和男性接受高活性双联抗血小板治疗的大出血风险相似(RR,1.18 [95%CI,0.98-1.41]与 RR,1.03 [95%CI,0.93-1.14])( 交互检验=0.20)。
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗/急性冠脉综合征后女性和男性接受高活性双联抗血小板治疗的疗效和安全性估计值之间的微小且无统计学意义的差异,不能证明对两性应采用不同的双联抗血小板治疗。