• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高活性 P2Y 抑制剂普拉格雷和替格瑞洛在双联抗血小板治疗的冠心病患者中的疗效和安全性:一项基于性别的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy and Safety of High Potent P2Y Inhibitors Prasugrel and Ticagrelor in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease Treated With Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Sex-Specific Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam The Netherlands.

Department of Epidemiology Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Feb 18;9(4):e014457. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014457. Epub 2020 Feb 17.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.119.014457
PMID:32063118
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7070195/
Abstract

Background Sex differences in efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy remain uncertain because of the underrepresentation of women in cardiovascular trials. The aim of this study was to perform a sex-specific analysis of the pooled efficacy and safety data of clinical trials comparing a high potent P2Y inhibitor+aspirin with clopidogrel+aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Methods and Results A systematic literature search was performed. Randomized clinical trials that compared patients following percutaneous coronary intervention/acute coronary syndrome who were taking high potent P2Y inhibitors+aspirin versus clopidogrel+aspirin were selected. Random effects estimates were calculated and relative risks with 95% CIs on efficacy and safety end points were determined per sex. We included 6 randomized clinical trials comparing prasugrel/ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in 43 990 patients (13 030 women), with a median follow-up time of 1.06 years. Women and men had similar relative risk (RR) reduction for major cardiovascular events (women: RR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.80-1.00; men: RR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.79-0.91) ( for interaction=0.39). Regarding safety, women and men had similar risk of major bleeding by high-potency dual antiplatelet therapy (RR, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.98-1.41] versus RR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.93-1.14]) ( for interaction=0.20). Conclusions The small and statistically insignificant difference in efficacy and safety estimates of high-potency dual antiplatelet therapy between women and men following percutaneous coronary intervention/acute coronary syndrome do not justify differential dual antiplatelet therapy treatment for both sexes.

摘要

背景

由于心血管试验中女性代表性不足,双重抗血小板治疗的疗效和安全性在性别上的差异仍不确定。本研究旨在对比较急性冠脉综合征患者使用高活性 P2Y 抑制剂+阿司匹林与氯吡格雷+阿司匹林的临床试验的汇总疗效和安全性数据进行性别特异性分析。

方法和结果

进行了系统的文献检索。选择了比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗/急性冠脉综合征后使用高活性 P2Y 抑制剂+阿司匹林与氯吡格雷+阿司匹林的患者的随机临床试验。计算了随机效应估计值,并确定了每个性别疗效和安全性终点的相对风险(RR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。我们纳入了 6 项比较普拉格雷/替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷的随机临床试验,共纳入 43990 例患者(13030 例女性),中位随访时间为 1.06 年。女性和男性主要心血管事件的 RR 降低相似(女性:RR,0.89 [95%CI,0.80-1.00;男性:RR,0.84 [95%CI,0.79-0.91])( 交互检验=0.39)。关于安全性,女性和男性接受高活性双联抗血小板治疗的大出血风险相似(RR,1.18 [95%CI,0.98-1.41]与 RR,1.03 [95%CI,0.93-1.14])( 交互检验=0.20)。

结论

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗/急性冠脉综合征后女性和男性接受高活性双联抗血小板治疗的疗效和安全性估计值之间的微小且无统计学意义的差异,不能证明对两性应采用不同的双联抗血小板治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2dd/7070195/7eab064a9f66/JAH3-9-e014457-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2dd/7070195/6c701fdab3f3/JAH3-9-e014457-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2dd/7070195/0a18daacffc1/JAH3-9-e014457-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2dd/7070195/082d8ad5151e/JAH3-9-e014457-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2dd/7070195/e978f5fffd67/JAH3-9-e014457-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2dd/7070195/7eab064a9f66/JAH3-9-e014457-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2dd/7070195/6c701fdab3f3/JAH3-9-e014457-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2dd/7070195/0a18daacffc1/JAH3-9-e014457-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2dd/7070195/082d8ad5151e/JAH3-9-e014457-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2dd/7070195/e978f5fffd67/JAH3-9-e014457-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2dd/7070195/7eab064a9f66/JAH3-9-e014457-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of High Potent P2Y Inhibitors Prasugrel and Ticagrelor in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease Treated With Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Sex-Specific Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.高活性 P2Y 抑制剂普拉格雷和替格瑞洛在双联抗血小板治疗的冠心病患者中的疗效和安全性:一项基于性别的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Feb 18;9(4):e014457. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014457. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
2
Meta-Analysis of Intraocular Bleeding With Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Using P2Y12 Inhibitors Prasugrel or Ticagrelor.双联抗血小板治疗中使用普拉格雷或替格瑞洛的 P2Y12 抑制剂致眼内出血的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Apr 15;125(8):1280-1283. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.01.012. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
3
Bleeding risk in patients prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy and triple therapy after coronary interventions: the ADAPTT retrospective population-based cohort studies.接受冠状动脉介入治疗后接受双联抗血小板治疗和三联治疗的患者的出血风险:ADAPTT 回顾性基于人群的队列研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2023 May;27(8):1-257. doi: 10.3310/MNJY9014.
4
The Safety and Efficacy of Aspirin Discontinuation on a Background of a P2Y Inhibitor in Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.阿司匹林停药联合经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后患者 P2Y 抑制剂的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2020 Aug 11;142(6):538-545. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046251. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
5
Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events of loss-of-function genotype guided prasugrel/ticagrelor vs clopidogrel therapy for acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis.指导普拉格雷/替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷治疗行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的功能丧失基因型与主要不良心血管事件风险:一项荟萃分析。
Platelets. 2021 Jul 4;32(5):591-600. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2020.1792871. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
6
P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy Versus Conventional Dual Antiplatelet Therapy or Aspirin Monotherapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Pooled Analysis of the SMART-DATE and SMART-CHOICE Trials.P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与急性冠状动脉综合征中常规双联抗血小板治疗或阿司匹林单药治疗的比较:SMART-DATE 和 SMART-CHOICE 试验的汇总分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Jul 1;150:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.03.053. Epub 2021 May 16.
7
Oral Antiplatelet Therapy After Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Review.急性冠状动脉综合征后的口服抗血小板治疗:综述。
JAMA. 2021 Apr 20;325(15):1545-1555. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0716.
8
Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.普拉格雷与替格瑞洛在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的比较:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2021 Jun;35(3):561-574. doi: 10.1007/s10557-020-07056-z. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
9
Pharmacodynamic Effects of Vorapaxar in Prior Myocardial Infarction Patients Treated With Potent Oral P2Y Receptor Inhibitors With and Without Aspirin: Results of the VORA-PRATIC Study.在伴有和不伴有阿司匹林的强效口服 P2Y 受体抑制剂治疗的既往心肌梗死患者中,沃拉帕沙的药效学作用:VORA-PRATIC 研究结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Apr 21;9(8):e015865. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.015865. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
10
Ticagrelor and prasugrel are independent predictors of improved long-term survival in ACS patients.替格瑞洛和普拉格雷可独立预测 ACS 患者长期生存改善。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2020 Nov;50(11):e13304. doi: 10.1111/eci.13304. Epub 2020 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Interrelation between hypoxic liver injury and Killip classification in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者缺氧性肝损伤与Killip分级的相互关系
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jan 20;11:1396243. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1396243. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Novel Antiplatelets and Standard Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.新型抗血小板药物与标准治疗方案对冠状动脉疾病患者的疗效及安全性比较
Cureus. 2024 Oct 12;16(10):e71333. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71333. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Sex-Based Outcomes of Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Gender-Related Differences in Antiplatelet Therapy and Impact on 1-Year Clinical Outcome in Patients Presenting With ACS: The START ANTIPLATELET Registry.急性冠状动脉综合征患者抗血小板治疗的性别差异及其对1年临床结局的影响:START抗血小板注册研究
Angiology. 2019 Mar;70(3):257-263. doi: 10.1177/0003319718783866. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
2
2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: The Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).2017年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)合作制定的冠状动脉疾病双联抗血小板治疗重点更新:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)和欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)冠状动脉疾病双联抗血小板治疗特别工作组。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 14;39(3):213-260. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx419.
3
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双联抗血小板治疗的性别结局:成对和网络荟萃分析。
Drugs. 2024 Jun;84(6):685-701. doi: 10.1007/s40265-024-02034-3. Epub 2024 May 29.
4
Sex Differences in Bleeding Risk Associated With Antithrombotic Therapy Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后抗栓治疗相关出血风险的性别差异
Circ Rep. 2024 Mar 5;6(4):99-109. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0015. eCollection 2024 Apr 10.
5
Narrowing disparities in PCI outcomes in women; From risk assessment, to referral pathways and outcomes.女性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)结果方面差距的缩小;从风险评估到转诊途径及结果。
Am Heart J Plus. 2022 Nov 5;24:100225. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100225. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Individualization of Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Coronary Stenting: A Comprehensive, Evidence-Based Review.冠状动脉支架置入术后双联抗血小板治疗疗程的个体化:一项全面的、基于证据的综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 17;12(22):7144. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227144.
7
Sex-Based Outcomes of P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy After Three Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者双联抗血小板治疗 3 个月后单用 P2Y12 抑制剂的性别结局。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Nov 20;38(45):e383. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e383.
8
Platelet P2Y signalling pathway in the dysregulated immune response during sepsis.血小板 P2Y 信号通路在脓毒症免疫失调反应中的作用。
Br J Pharmacol. 2024 Feb;181(4):532-546. doi: 10.1111/bph.16207. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
9
The Signaling Pathway of the ADP Receptor P2Y in the Immune System: Recent Discoveries and New Challenges.免疫系统中 ADP 受体 P2Y 的信号通路:最新发现与新挑战。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Apr 4;24(7):6709. doi: 10.3390/ijms24076709.
10
Sex-Related Bleeding Risk in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Receiving Dual Antiplatelet Therapy with Aspirin and a P2Y12 Inhibitor.急性冠状动脉综合征患者接受阿司匹林和 P2Y12 抑制剂双联抗血小板治疗的出血风险与性别相关。
Med Princ Pract. 2023;32(3):200-208. doi: 10.1159/000529863. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
Benefit of switching dual antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome: the TOPIC (timing of platelet inhibition after acute coronary syndrome) randomized study.急性冠脉综合征后转换双联抗血小板治疗的获益:TOPIC(急性冠脉综合征后血小板抑制的时机)随机研究。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Nov 1;38(41):3070-3078. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx175.
4
Gender-related differences in antiplatelet treatment patterns and outcome: Insights from the GReekAntiPlatElet Registry.抗血小板治疗模式和结局的性别差异:来自希腊抗血小板注册研究的见解。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2017 Aug;35(4). doi: 10.1111/1755-5922.12270.
5
Potent P2Y Inhibitors in Men Versus Women: A Collaborative Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.男性与女性中强效的 P2Y12 抑制剂:一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Mar 28;69(12):1549-1559. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.028.
6
Sex Differences in the Clinical Impact of High Platelet Reactivity After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-Eluting Stents: Results From the ADAPT-DES Study (Assessment of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With Drug-Eluting Stents).药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后高血小板反应性临床影响的性别差异:ADAPT-DES研究(药物洗脱支架双重抗血小板治疗评估)结果
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Feb;10(2). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.003577.
7
Basics of meta-analysis: I is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity.荟萃分析基础:I 不是异质性的绝对度量。
Res Synth Methods. 2017 Mar;8(1):5-18. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1230. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
8
Sex-specific differences in risk factors for in-hospital mortality and complications in patients with acute coronary syndromes : An observational cohort study.急性冠状动脉综合征患者院内死亡和并发症危险因素的性别差异:一项观察性队列研究。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2017 Apr;129(7-8):233-242. doi: 10.1007/s00508-016-1105-7. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
9
Sex-Based Differences in Cessation of Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Stents.基于性别的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗支架置入后双联抗血小板治疗停药差异。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jul 25;9(14):1461-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.004.
10
Plea for routinely presenting prediction intervals in meta-analysis.呼吁在荟萃分析中常规呈现预测区间。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 12;6(7):e010247. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010247.