Schmidt-Rohr Klaus
Department of Chemistry, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02465, United States.
ACS Omega. 2020 Jan 28;5(5):2221-2233. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b03352. eCollection 2020 Feb 11.
A fundamental re-assessment of the overall energetics of biochemical electron transfer chains and cycles is presented, highlighting the crucial role of the highest-energy molecule involved, O. The chemical energy utilized by most complex multicellular organisms is not predominantly stored in glucose or fat, but rather in O with its relatively weak (i.e., high-energy) double bond. Accordingly, reactions of O with organic molecules are highly exergonic, while other reactions of glucose, fat, NAD(P)H, or ubiquinol (QH) are not, as demonstrated in anaerobic respiration with its meager energy output. The notion that "reduced molecules" such as alkanes or fatty acids are energy-rich is shown to be incorrect; they only unlock the energy of more O, compared to O-containing molecules of similar mass. Glucose contains a moderate amount of chemical energy per bond (<20% compared to O), as confirmed by the relatively small energy output in glycolysis and the Krebs cycle converting glucose to CO and NADH. Only in the "terminal" aerobic respiration reaction with O does a large free energy change occur due to the release of oxygen's stored chemical energy. The actual reaction of O in complex IV of the inner mitochondrial membrane does not even involve any organic fuel molecule and yet releases >1 MJ when 6 mol of O reacts. The traditional presentation that relegated O to the role of a low-energy terminal acceptor for depleted electrons has not explained these salient observations and must be abandoned. Its central notion that electrons release energy because they move from a high-energy donor to a low-energy acceptor is demonstrably false. The energies of (at least) two donor and two acceptor species come into play, and the low "terminal" negative reduction potential in aerobic respiration can be attributed to the unusually high energy of O, the crucial reactant. This is confirmed by comparison with the corresponding half-reaction without O, which is endergonic. In addition, the electrons are mostly not accepted by oxygen but by hydrogen. Redox energy transfer and release diagrams are introduced to provide a superior representation of the energetics of the various species in coupled half-reactions. Electron transport by movement of reduced molecules in the electron transfer chain is shown to run counter to the energy flow, which is carried by oxidized species. O, rather than glucose, NAD(P)H, or ATP, is the molecule that provides the most energy to animals and plants and is crucial for sustaining large complex life forms. The analysis also highlights a significant discrepancy in the proposed energetics of reactions of aerobic respiration, which should be re-evaluated.
本文对生化电子传递链和循环的整体能量学进行了根本性的重新评估,强调了所涉及的最高能量分子O的关键作用。大多数复杂多细胞生物利用的化学能量并非主要储存在葡萄糖或脂肪中,而是储存在具有相对较弱(即高能量)双键的O中。因此,O与有机分子的反应是高度放能的,而葡萄糖、脂肪、NAD(P)H或泛醇(QH)的其他反应则不然,这在能量输出微薄的无氧呼吸中得到了证明。认为烷烃或脂肪酸等“还原分子”富含能量的观点被证明是错误的;与质量相似的含O分子相比,它们只是释放了更多O的能量。葡萄糖每个化学键所含的化学能量适中(与O相比<20%),糖酵解和将葡萄糖转化为CO和NADH的三羧酸循环中相对较小的能量输出证实了这一点。只有在与O的“末端”有氧呼吸反应中,由于氧气储存的化学能量的释放才会发生较大的自由能变化。线粒体内膜复合体IV中O的实际反应甚至不涉及任何有机燃料分子,但当6摩尔O反应时会释放>1 MJ的能量。传统观点将O贬低为耗尽电子的低能量末端受体,无法解释这些显著的观察结果,必须摒弃。其核心观点,即电子因为从高能量供体移动到低能量受体而释放能量,显然是错误的。(至少)两种供体和两种受体物种的能量都起作用,有氧呼吸中低的“末端”负还原电位可归因于关键反应物O的异常高能量。与没有O的相应半反应(该反应是吸能的)进行比较证实了这一点。此外,电子大多不是被氧气而是被氢所接受。引入了氧化还原能量转移和释放图,以更好地表示耦合半反应中各种物种的能量学。电子传递链中还原分子的移动所导致的电子传输与能量流方向相反,能量流由氧化物种携带。对动植物而言,提供最多能量且对维持大型复杂生命形式至关重要的分子是O,而非葡萄糖、NAD(P)H或ATP。该分析还突出了有氧呼吸反应能量学中存在的显著差异,应重新进行评估。