Suppr超能文献

缩短全身 MRI 采集时间:3D T1 梯度回波 Dixon 与快速自旋回波在前列腺癌转移筛查中的比较。

Shortening the acquisition time of whole-body MRI: 3D T1 gradient echo Dixon vs fast spin echo for metastatic screening in prostate cancer.

机构信息

Department of Radiology an Medical Imaging, Centre du Cancer and Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Avenue Hippocrate 10/2942, B-1200, Brussels, Belgium.

Philips Medical Systems International BV, Veenpluis 4-6, 5684 PC, Best, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2020 Jun;30(6):3083-3093. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06515-y. Epub 2020 Feb 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare 3D T1-weighted fast spin echo (FSE) and 3D T1-weighted gradient echo (GE) mDixon as morphologic sequences to complement diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for the metastatic screening in prostate cancer (PCa) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty PCa patients at high risk of metastases prospectively underwent both a 3D T1 FSE (14 min) and a rapid 3D T1 GE (1 min 20 s) sequences within a WB-MRI protocol. Two readers assessed the diagnostic performance of the FSE/Fat/in-phase (IP)/IP+Fat sequences in detecting bone and node metastases. The reference standard was established by a panel of four physicians on the basis of all baseline and follow-up imaging, biological and clinical information. The reproducibility of readings, predictive accuracy (Acc) from ROC curves analysis, and contrast-to-reference ratio (CRR) in lesions were assessed for each sequence.

RESULTS

In bone and lymph nodes (per-region analysis), reproducibility was at least good for all sequences/readers, except for nodes in the common iliac/inguinal regions. In bone (per-organ analysis), Acc of FSE was superior to that of mDixon (difference + 4%, p < 0.0083). In nodes (per-organ analysis), Acc of Fat was superior to that of other sequences (difference + 4% to + 6% depending on reader, p < 0.0083). In the per-patient analysis, Acc of FSE was superior to that of mDixon (difference + 4% to + 6% depending on sequence, p < 0.0083). Fat images had higher CRR compared with FSE in the thoracic spine, the bony pelvis and lymph node metastases (p < 0.025).

CONCLUSION

3D T1 GE may replace 3D T1 FSE to complement DWI in WB-MRI for metastatic screening in PCa. It demonstrates an Acc ranging from + 4% to + 6% (nodes) to - 4% to - 6% (bone and patient staging) compared with FSE and considerably reduces the examination time, offering the perspective of acquiring WB-MRI examinations in less than 20 min.

KEY POINTS

• The replacement of 3D T1 FSE by the 3D T1 GE mDixon as morphologic sequence to complement DWI drastically reduces the acquisition time of WB-MRI studies. • The 3D T1 GE mDixon sequence offers similar reproducibility of image readings compared with that of the 3D T1 FSE. • Differences in diagnostic accuracy are limited (+ 4%/+ 6% in favor of mDixon to detect node metastases; + 4%/+ 6% in favor of FSE to detect bone metastases/metastatic disease in a patient).

摘要

目的

比较 3D T1 加权快速自旋回波(FSE)和 3D T1 加权梯度回波(GE)mDixon 作为形态学序列,以补充扩散加权成像(DWI)在前列腺癌(PCa)患者中的转移筛查。

材料与方法

30 例高危转移的 PCa 患者前瞻性地在 WB-MRI 方案中同时进行 3D T1 FSE(14 分钟)和快速 3D T1 GE(1 分 20 秒)序列检查。两位读者评估了 FSE/Fat/同相(IP)/IP+Fat 序列在检测骨和淋巴结转移方面的诊断性能。参考标准由四位医生根据所有基线和随访影像学、生物学和临床信息建立。评估了每个序列的阅读可重复性、来自 ROC 曲线分析的预测准确性(Acc)以及病变中的对比参考比(CRR)。

结果

在骨和淋巴结(区域分析)中,除了髂总和腹股沟区淋巴结外,所有序列/读者的可重复性均至少为良好。在骨(器官分析)中,FSE 的 Acc 优于 mDixon(差异+4%,p<0.0083)。在淋巴结(器官分析)中,Fat 序列的 Acc 优于其他序列(差异+4%至+6%,取决于读者,p<0.0083)。在患者分析中,FSE 的 Acc 优于 mDixon(差异+4%至+6%,取决于序列,p<0.0083)。与 FSE 相比,脂肪图像在胸椎、骨盆骨和淋巴结转移中具有更高的 CRR(p<0.025)。

结论

3D T1 GE 可替代 3D T1 FSE 与 DWI 联合用于 WB-MRI 转移筛查,与 FSE 相比,Acc 可提高+4%至+6%(淋巴结)至-4%至-6%(骨和患者分期),同时显著缩短检查时间,为在 20 分钟内完成 WB-MRI 检查提供了可能性。

关键点

  1. 3D T1 FSE 被 3D T1 GE mDixon 替代为形态学序列,与 DWI 联合使用,大大缩短了 WB-MRI 研究的采集时间。

  2. 3D T1 GE mDixon 序列的图像阅读可重复性与 3D T1 FSE 相似。

  3. 诊断准确性的差异有限(以 mDixon 检测淋巴结转移时为+4%/+6%;以 FSE 检测骨转移/患者转移疾病时为+4%/+6%)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验