• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

布比卡因对比利多卡因:在阻生第三磨牙手术中局麻药效果的比较。

Bupivacaine vs. lidocaine: a comparison of local anesthetic efficacy in impacted third molar surgery.

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Oral Surgery Department, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey.

Faculty of Dentistry, Oral Surgery Department, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Oct;24(10):3539-3546. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03224-5. Epub 2020 Feb 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00784-020-03224-5
PMID:32065309
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the anesthetic efficacy, the duration of anesthesia, and the postoperative analgesia of lidocaine and bupivacaine and to determine any difference in hemodynamic parameters in patients who required impacted third molar removal.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight patients between the ages of 18 and 40, with no systemic disease, were included in the study, with an indication of impacted lower third molar extraction. One of two local anesthetic agents (Marcaine and Jetokain Simplex) was randomly selected for tooth extractions. The parameters evaluated were the onset of anesthetic agent action, the duration of operation, the duration of postoperative analgesia, and postoperative visual analog scale scores. Hemodynamic parameters were observed and evaluated preoperatively and during the operation. All data were evaluated statistically.

RESULTS

When the time of anesthesia onset was analyzed according to both anesthetic solutions, the difference was in favor of lidocaine (p = 0.01). The duration of action was longer in the bupivacaine group than in the lidocaine group (p = 0.00002). VAS values for the pain obtained during injection were lower in the lidocaine group (p = 0.009).However, according to the results of our study, the postoperative analgesic efficacy of bupivacaine is similar to that of lidocaine (p = 0.087).

CONCLUSION

After evaluation of these results, we can recommend the use of lidocaine and bupivacaine safely in dentistry practice. But long-duration effect of bupivacaine and the rapid effect of lidocaine may make lidocaine more preferable.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

It is important to determine the clinically effective and safe anesthetic solution.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较利多卡因和布比卡因的麻醉效果、麻醉持续时间和术后镇痛效果,并确定需要拔除阻生第三磨牙的患者的血流动力学参数是否存在差异。

材料和方法

本研究纳入了 38 名年龄在 18 至 40 岁之间、无系统性疾病、需要拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙的患者。随机选择两种局部麻醉剂(Marcaine 和 Jetokain Simplex)之一用于拔牙。评估的参数包括麻醉剂起效时间、手术持续时间、术后镇痛持续时间和术后视觉模拟评分。观察并评估术前和手术期间的血流动力学参数。所有数据均进行统计学评估。

结果

根据两种麻醉剂分析麻醉起效时间时,利多卡因组的差异更有利(p=0.01)。布比卡因组的作用持续时间长于利多卡因组(p=0.00002)。利多卡因组注射时疼痛的 VAS 值较低(p=0.009)。然而,根据我们的研究结果,布比卡因的术后镇痛效果与利多卡因相似(p=0.087)。

结论

在评估这些结果后,我们可以推荐在牙科实践中安全使用利多卡因和布比卡因。但是布比卡因的作用持续时间长和利多卡因的起效迅速可能使利多卡因更受欢迎。

临床意义

确定临床有效和安全的麻醉剂溶液非常重要。

相似文献

1
Bupivacaine vs. lidocaine: a comparison of local anesthetic efficacy in impacted third molar surgery.布比卡因对比利多卡因:在阻生第三磨牙手术中局麻药效果的比较。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Oct;24(10):3539-3546. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03224-5. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
2
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of 2% lidocaine HCl with different epinephrine concentration for local anesthesia in participants undergoing surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover, phase IV trial.不同肾上腺素浓度的2%盐酸利多卡因用于下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术局部麻醉的疗效与安全性比较:一项多中心、随机、双盲、交叉、IV期试验
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 May;96(21):e6753. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006753.
3
Comparative Study of the Efficacy of 4% Articaine vs 2% Lidocaine in Surgical Removal of Bilaterally Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.4%阿替卡因与2%利多卡因在双侧下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术中疗效的比较研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Jun 1;19(6):743-748.
4
Anesthetic and analgesic efficacy of bupivacaine in mandibular third molar surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.布比卡因在下颌第三磨牙手术中的麻醉和镇痛效果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Quintessence Int. 2020;51(7):586-597. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a44633.
5
Double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial on analgesic efficacy of local anesthetics articaine and bupivacaine after impacted third molar extraction.局部麻醉剂阿替卡因和布比卡因在拔除阻生第三磨牙后镇痛效果的双盲、随机对照临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Dec;22(9):2981-2988. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2386-1. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
6
Efficiency of bupivacaine versus lidocaine and methylprednisolone versus placebo to reduce postoperative pain and swelling after surgical removal of mandibular third molars: a randomized, double-blinded, crossover clinical trial.布比卡因与利多卡因以及甲泼尼龙与安慰剂在减少下颌第三磨牙拔除术后疼痛和肿胀方面的效果比较:一项随机、双盲、交叉临床试验。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Sep;71(9):1490-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
7
Comparison between lidocaine and bupivacaine as local anesthetics with diflunisal for postoperative pain control after lower third molar surgery.利多卡因和布比卡因作为局部麻醉剂与双氟芬酸联合用于下颌第三磨牙手术后疼痛控制的比较。
Anesth Prog. 1988 Jan-Feb;35(1):1-4.
8
A randomized anesthethic potency comparison between ropivacaine and bupivacaine on the perioperative regional anesthesia in lower third molar surgery.罗哌卡因与布比卡因用于下第三磨牙手术围手术期区域麻醉的随机麻醉效能比较。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Oct;47(10):1652-1660. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.07.019. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
9
Bupivacaine versus lidocaine for third molar surgery: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study.布比卡因与利多卡因用于第三磨牙手术:一项双盲、随机、交叉研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999 May;57(5):510-4; discussion 515. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(99)90063-0.
10
Comparison of the effects of articaine and bupivacaine in impacted mandibular third molar tooth surgery: a randomized, controlled trial.阿替卡因与布比卡因在下颌阻生第三磨牙手术中的效果比较:一项随机对照试验。
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Dec;21(6):575-582. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2021.21.6.575. Epub 2021 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
The efficacy of non-depolarizing muscle relaxant as adjuvants to local anesthesia in peribulbar block during cataract surgery.非去极化肌松药作为白内障手术球周阻滞局部麻醉辅助用药的疗效。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 29;15(1):3725. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87042-3.
2
Pain Management in Surgical Treatment of Facial Fractures: Alternative Approaches to Opioid Use.面部骨折手术治疗中的疼痛管理:阿片类药物使用的替代方法
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2024 Dec;17(4):NP319-NP331. doi: 10.1177/19433875241236869. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
3
Comparison of efficacy and pain perception using 0.5% Bupivacaine and 2% Lidocaine in periodontal Surgery - A split mouth randomized clinical trial.
在牙周手术中使用0.5%布比卡因和2%利多卡因的疗效及疼痛感知比较——一项双侧随机临床试验
Eur Oral Res. 2021 Sep 1;55(3):139-145. doi: 10.26650/eor.2021853507.