• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在牙周手术中使用0.5%布比卡因和2%利多卡因的疗效及疼痛感知比较——一项双侧随机临床试验

Comparison of efficacy and pain perception using 0.5% Bupivacaine and 2% Lidocaine in periodontal Surgery - A split mouth randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Tirumalasetty Shanmukha Srinivas Manikanta, Chinniswami Doraisami Dwarakanath, Konathala Santosh Venkata Ramesh, Penmetsa Subhadra Gautami, Gottumukkala Naga Venkata Satya Sai Sruthima

机构信息

Department of Periodontics, GSL Dental College, Rajahmundry, India.

Department of Periodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram,India.

出版信息

Eur Oral Res. 2021 Sep 1;55(3):139-145. doi: 10.26650/eor.2021853507.

DOI:10.26650/eor.2021853507
PMID:34746785
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8547754/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of bupivacaine and lidocaine local anesthesia on the intra-surgical and post-surgical pain control in patients undergoing periodontal flap surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A randomized, single-blind, split-mouth design was employed in patients who are scheduled for periodontal flap surgery for at least two similar sextants with similar anesthetic techniques. Fifty patients (age range 16-65 years, 32 males and 28 females) enrolled in the present study. On one-site, the flap surgery was performed using 2% lidocaine with 1:200000 epinephrine and on the other with 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200000 epinephrine. Base line clinical parameters, probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level were recorded. Pain during intra operative period, at the time of loss of numbness and for three consecutive days was measured using visual analog scale (VAS).

RESULTS

Significant differences were observed between the two groups in the intra operative pain scores (p=0.0045) and pain scores at the time of loss of numbness (p=0.0005) but not at the 1st, 2nd and 3rd day after the surgery.

CONCLUSION

Bupivacaine was markedy more effective than the lidocaine. Thus the usage of bupivacaine can be substantiated for periodontal surgeries for the control of pain in the intra operative and immediate post-operative period to increase patients' comfort.

摘要

目的

评估布比卡因和利多卡因局部麻醉对接受牙周翻瓣手术患者术中及术后疼痛控制的效果。

材料与方法

采用随机、单盲、双侧对照设计,纳入计划接受牙周翻瓣手术且至少有两个相似象限采用相似麻醉技术的患者。本研究共纳入50例患者(年龄范围16 - 65岁,男性32例,女性28例)。在一侧,翻瓣手术使用含1:200000肾上腺素的2%利多卡因进行,另一侧使用含1:200000肾上腺素的0.5%布比卡因进行。记录基线临床参数,包括探诊深度、临床附着水平。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量术中、麻醉消退时及术后连续三天的疼痛情况。

结果

两组在术中疼痛评分(p = 0.0045)和麻醉消退时的疼痛评分(p = 0.0005)存在显著差异,但在术后第1、2和3天无显著差异。

结论

布比卡因在控制疼痛方面明显比利多卡因更有效。因此,布比卡因在牙周手术中用于控制术中及术后即刻疼痛以提高患者舒适度是有依据的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5408/8547754/0e0a38c6ebfd/eor-055-139-e001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5408/8547754/0e0a38c6ebfd/eor-055-139-e001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5408/8547754/0e0a38c6ebfd/eor-055-139-e001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of efficacy and pain perception using 0.5% Bupivacaine and 2% Lidocaine in periodontal Surgery - A split mouth randomized clinical trial.在牙周手术中使用0.5%布比卡因和2%利多卡因的疗效及疼痛感知比较——一项双侧随机临床试验
Eur Oral Res. 2021 Sep 1;55(3):139-145. doi: 10.26650/eor.2021853507.
2
A comparison of postoperative pain experience following periodontal surgery using two local anesthetic agents.使用两种局部麻醉剂进行牙周手术后疼痛体验的比较。
J Periodontol. 1986 Oct;57(10):637-42. doi: 10.1902/jop.1986.57.10.637.
3
A clinical trial of long-acting local anesthetics for periodontal surgery.长效局部麻醉剂用于牙周手术的临床试验。
Anesth Prog. 1990 Jul;37(4):194-8.
4
Comparison of postoperative bupivacaine with lidocaine on pain and analgesic use following periodontal surgery.牙周手术后布比卡因与利多卡因对疼痛及镇痛药物使用情况的比较。
J West Soc Periodontol Periodontal Abstr. 1997;45(1):5-8.
5
A comparison of the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine, ropivacaine (with epinephrine) and their equal volume mixtures with lidocaine used for femoral and sciatic nerve blocks: a double-blind randomized study.布比卡因、罗哌卡因(含肾上腺素)及其与利多卡因等体积混合液用于股神经和坐骨神经阻滞的药效学和药代动力学比较:一项双盲随机研究。
Anesth Analg. 2009 Feb;108(2):641-9. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31819237f8.
6
Comparison of bupivacaine and lidocaine use for postoperative pain control in endodontics.布比卡因与利多卡因用于牙髓病术后疼痛控制的比较。
Iran Endod J. 2010 Winter;5(1):31-5. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
7
Influence of intra-pocket anesthesia gel on treatment outcome in periodontal patients: a randomized controlled trial.袋内麻醉凝胶对牙周病患者治疗效果的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Periodontol. 2014 May;41(5):481-8. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12239. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
8
Comparative Evaluation of Anesthetic Efficacy of 2% Lidocaine, 4% Articaine, and 0.5% Bupivacaine on Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial.比较 2%利多卡因、4%阿替卡因和 0.5%布比卡因在下颌神经阻滞麻醉对症状性不可逆性牙髓炎患者的麻醉效果的前瞻性、随机、双盲临床试验。
J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2017;31(2):124-128. doi: 10.11607/ofph.1642.
9
Buffered Versus Nonbuffered Local Anesthetics and Local Pain Scores in Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty: Randomized Controlled Trial.上睑成形术中缓冲与非缓冲局部麻醉剂及局部疼痛评分:随机对照试验
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023;39(6):602-605. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002442. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
10
Is amalgamated ligno-bupivacaine an answer to complicated minor oral surgical anesthesia? A randomized split-mouth double-blind clinical trial.混合木质素布比卡因是复杂小型口腔外科麻醉的解决方案吗?一项随机双盲口内对照临床试验。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Mar;22(1):97-104. doi: 10.1007/s10006-018-0676-z. Epub 2018 Jan 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Lidocaine With Epinephrine Versus Bupivacaine With Epinephrine as Local Anesthetic Agents in Wide-Awake Hand Surgery: A Pilot Outcome Study of Patient's Pain Perception.在清醒手部手术中,利多卡因加肾上腺素与布比卡因加肾上腺素作为局部麻醉剂的比较:一项关于患者疼痛感知的初步结果研究。
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2019 Oct 31;2(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2019.09.004. eCollection 2020 Jan.
2
Bupivacaine vs. lidocaine: a comparison of local anesthetic efficacy in impacted third molar surgery.布比卡因对比利多卡因:在阻生第三磨牙手术中局麻药效果的比较。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Oct;24(10):3539-3546. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03224-5. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
3
Efficacy and safety of bupivacaine versus lidocaine in dental treatments: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
布比卡因与利多卡因在牙科治疗中的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int Dent J. 2014 Feb;64(1):34-45. doi: 10.1111/idj.12060. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
4
Comparison of the anesthetic efficacy between bupivacaine and lidocaine in patients with irreversible pulpitis of mandibular molar.比较布比卡因和利多卡因在下颌磨牙不可复性牙髓炎患者中的麻醉效果。
J Endod. 2012 May;38(5):594-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.01.008. Epub 2012 Feb 4.
5
Intraoperative bleeding during open flap debridement and regenerative periodontal surgery.在开放式翻瓣清创和再生牙周手术期间的术中出血。
J Periodontol. 2012 Jan;83(1):55-60. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110182. Epub 2011 May 12.
6
Long-acting local anesthetics and perioperative pain management.长效局部麻醉药与围手术期疼痛管理
Dent Clin North Am. 2010 Oct;54(4):611-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2010.06.002.
7
The differential effects of bupivacaine and lidocaine on prostaglandin E2 release, cyclooxygenase gene expression and pain in a clinical pain model.布比卡因和利多卡因对临床疼痛模型中前列腺素E2释放、环氧化酶基因表达及疼痛的不同影响
Anesth Analg. 2008 Jan;106(1):321-7, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000296474.79437.23.
8
The effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on bleeding during periodontal surgery.非甾体抗炎药对牙周手术期间出血的影响。
J Periodontol. 2005 Jul;76(7):1154-60. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.7.1154.
9
Review of local anaesthetic agents.局部麻醉药综述。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2005 Mar;71(3):59-74.
10
Dental postoperative pain management in children.儿童牙科术后疼痛管理
Dent Clin North Am. 2002 Oct;46(4):707-17. doi: 10.1016/s0011-8532(02)00028-9.