British Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Cardiovasc Res. 2021 Jan 1;117(1):320-329. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvz345.
The effects of serelaxin, a recombinant form of human relaxin-2 peptide, on vascular function in the coronary microvascular and systemic macrovascular circulation remain largely unknown. This mechanistic, clinical study assessed the effects of serelaxin on myocardial perfusion, aortic stiffness, and safety in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD).
In this multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study, 58 patients were randomized 1:1 to 48 h intravenous infusion of serelaxin (30 µg/kg/day) or matching placebo. The primary endpoints were change from baseline to 47 h post-initiation of the infusion in global myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) assessed using adenosine stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and applanation tonometry-derived augmentation index (AIx). Secondary endpoints were: change from baseline in AIx and pulse wave velocity, assessed at 47 h, Day 30, and Day 180; aortic distensibility at 47 h; pharmacokinetics and safety. Exploratory endpoints were the effect on cardiorenal biomarkers [N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high-sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT), endothelin-1, and cystatin C]. Of 58 patients, 51 were included in the primary analysis (serelaxin, n = 25; placebo, n = 26). After 2 and 6 h of serelaxin infusion, mean placebo-corrected blood pressure reductions of -9.6 mmHg (P = 0.01) and -13.5 mmHg (P = 0.0003) for systolic blood pressure and -5.2 mmHg (P = 0.02) and -8.4 mmHg (P = 0.001) for diastolic blood pressure occurred. There were no between-group differences from baseline to 47 h in global MPR (-0.24 vs. -0.13, P = 0.44) or AIx (3.49% vs. 0.04%, P = 0.21) with serelaxin compared with placebo. Endothelin-1 and cystatin C levels decreased from baseline in the serelaxin group, and there were no clinically relevant changes observed with serelaxin for NT-proBNP or hsTnT. Similar numbers of serious adverse events were observed in both groups (serelaxin, n = 5; placebo, n = 7) to 180-day follow-up.
In patients with stable CAD, 48 h intravenous serelaxin reduced blood pressure but did not alter myocardial perfusion.
松弛素-2 肽的重组形式——赛乐瑞森对冠状动脉微血管和全身大血管循环的血管功能的影响在很大程度上尚不清楚。这项机制性、临床研究评估了赛乐瑞森对稳定性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者心肌灌注、主动脉僵硬度和安全性的影响。
在这项多中心、双盲、平行组、安慰剂对照研究中,58 名患者按 1:1 随机分配至 48 小时静脉输注赛乐瑞森(30μg/kg/天)或匹配的安慰剂。主要终点是从开始输注后 47 小时至 47 小时的基线变化,通过腺苷应激灌注心脏磁共振成像评估整体心肌灌注储备(MPR),以及平板张力测量的增强指数(AIx)。次要终点是:从基线开始,在 47 小时、第 30 天和第 180 天评估 AIx 和脉搏波速度的变化;47 小时时的主动脉可扩张性;药代动力学和安全性。探索性终点是对心肾生物标志物[氨基末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)、高敏肌钙蛋白 T(hsTnT)、内皮素-1 和胱抑素 C]的影响。58 名患者中,51 名患者纳入主要分析(赛乐瑞森,n=25;安慰剂,n=26)。在赛乐瑞森输注后 2 小时和 6 小时,收缩压的平均安慰剂校正血压降低分别为-9.6mmHg(P=0.01)和-13.5mmHg(P=0.0003),舒张压分别为-5.2mmHg(P=0.02)和-8.4mmHg(P=0.001)。与安慰剂相比,赛乐瑞森组从基线到 47 小时,整体 MPR(-0.24 对-0.13,P=0.44)或 AIx(3.49%对 0.04%,P=0.21)的组间差异无统计学意义。与基线相比,赛乐瑞森组的内皮素-1 和胱抑素 C 水平下降,赛乐瑞森对 NT-proBNP 或 hsTnT 没有观察到临床相关变化。在 180 天随访期间,两组均观察到相同数量的严重不良事件(赛乐瑞森,n=5;安慰剂,n=7)。
在稳定性 CAD 患者中,48 小时静脉内赛乐瑞森降低了血压,但没有改变心肌灌注。