• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨文化差异与价值观相关的行人行为:五个国家的比较。

Cross-cultural differences in pedestrian behaviors in relation to values: A comparison of five countries.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, İzmir Bakırçay University, Turkey; Safety Research Unit, Department of Psychology, Middle East Technical University, Turkey.

Safety Research Unit, Department of Psychology, Middle East Technical University, Turkey.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Apr;138:105459. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105459. Epub 2020 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2020.105459
PMID:32065913
Abstract

This study compared pedestrian behaviors in five countries (Estonia, Greece, Kosovo, Russia, and Turkey) and investigated the relationships between these behaviors and values in each country. The study participants were 131 pedestrians for Estonia, 249 for Greece, 112 for Kosovo, 176 for Russia, and 145 for Turkey. The principal component analyses revealed that the four-factor structure of the Pedestrian Behavior Scale (PBS) was highly consistent across the five countries. ANCOVA results revealed significant differences between countries on the PBS items and scale scores. Specifically, Greek and Turkish participants reported transgressive pedestrian behaviors more frequently than Estonian, Kosovar, and Russian pedestrians while Kosovar participants reported transgressive pedestrian behaviors less frequently than Estonian pedestrians. In addition, Turkish and Russian pedestrians reported lapses and aggressive behaviors more frequently than Estonian, Greek, and Kosovar pedestrians. Finally, Turkish and Estonian pedestrians reported positive behaviors more frequently than Kosovar pedestrians. Unexpectedly, the regression analyses showed that values have varying effects on pedestrian behavior in the five countries. That is, context or country may determine the effect of values on pedestrian behaviors. The results are discussed in relation to the previous literature.

摘要

本研究比较了五个国家(爱沙尼亚、希腊、科索沃、俄罗斯和土耳其)的行人行为,并调查了这些行为与每个国家价值观之间的关系。研究参与者包括爱沙尼亚的 131 名行人、希腊的 249 名行人、科索沃的 112 名行人、俄罗斯的 176 名行人和土耳其的 145 名行人。主成分分析结果表明,行人行为量表(PBS)的四因素结构在五个国家高度一致。ANCOVA 结果显示,行人行为量表项目和量表得分在国家之间存在显著差异。具体而言,希腊和土耳其的参与者比爱沙尼亚、科索沃和俄罗斯的行人更频繁地报告违反规则的行人行为,而科索沃的参与者比爱沙尼亚的行人更不频繁地报告违反规则的行人行为。此外,土耳其和俄罗斯的行人比爱沙尼亚、希腊和科索沃的行人更频繁地报告疏忽和攻击行为。最后,土耳其和爱沙尼亚的行人比科索沃的行人更频繁地报告积极的行为。出乎意料的是,回归分析显示,价值观对五个国家的行人行为有不同的影响。也就是说,背景或国家可能会决定价值观对行人行为的影响。研究结果与以往文献进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Cross-cultural differences in pedestrian behaviors in relation to values: A comparison of five countries.跨文化差异与价值观相关的行人行为:五个国家的比较。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Apr;138:105459. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105459. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
2
The mediating effect of traffic safety climate between pedestrian inconvenience and pedestrian behavior.行人性不便与行人性为间交通安全氛围的中介效应。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Oct;119:155-161. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.07.020. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
3
Evaluating pedestrian behavior at crosswalks: Validation of a pedestrian behavior questionnaire for the U.S. population.评估人行横道上的行人行为:针对美国人群的行人行为问卷的验证
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Sep;106:191-201. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.05.020. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
4
Effect of exposure to aggressive stimuli on aggressive driving behavior at pedestrian crossings at unmarked roadways.暴露于激进刺激下对无标志道路路口行人穿越激进驾驶行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Mar;88:159-68. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.12.026. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
5
Pedestrian crossing behavior, an observational study in the city of Ushuaia, Argentina.行人过街行为,在阿根廷乌斯怀亚市的一项观察性研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018 Apr 3;19(3):305-310. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1391380. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
6
Vulnerable road users in low-, middle-, and high-income countries: Validation of a Pedestrian Behaviour Questionnaire.低、中、高收入国家的弱势道路使用者:行人行为问卷的验证。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Oct;131:80-94. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.05.027. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
7
How do fatalistic beliefs affect the attitudes and pedestrian behaviours of road users in different countries? A cross-cultural study.宿命信念如何影响不同国家道路使用者的态度和行为?一项跨文化研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 May;139:105491. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105491. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
8
A comparative study of safe and unsafe signalized intersections from the view point of pedestrian behavior and perception.从行人和感知的角度对安全和不安全信号交叉口的比较研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Nov;132:105218. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.06.010. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
9
Investigating the interaction between pedestrian behaviors and crashes through validation of a pedestrian behavior questionnaire (PBQ).通过验证行人行为问卷(PBQ)来研究行人和事故之间的相互作用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Apr;153:106050. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106050. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
10
Development of the pedestrian anger expression inventory.行人愤怒表达量表的编制。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(2):167-172. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1854454. Epub 2021 Jan 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Pedestrian behavior among Chinese seniors: Insights from factor analysis and structural equation modeling.中国老年人的行人行为:基于因子分析和结构方程模型的见解
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 30;10(17):e37034. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37034. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.
2
Reduction of pedestrian death rates: a missed global target.降低行人死亡率:一个被忽视的全球目标。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 May 19;15(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00315-2.