Comparison of image quality and focal lesion detection in abdominopelvic CT: Potential dose reduction using advanced modelled iterative reconstruction.

PURPOSE

To evaluate radiation dose exposure, diagnostic performance, and image quality of low-dose and ultralow-dose abdominopelvic CT using the advanced modelled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE) algorithm for focal lesion detection.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-nine consecutive patients underwent contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT using a third-generation dual-source scanner to obtain three data sets with the following tube loads: 33.3% (ultralow-dose CT), 66.7% (low-dose CT), and 100% (standard-dose CT). The diagnostic performances of standard-dose CT, low-dose CT, and ultralow-dose CT for focal lesion detection and characterization in organs of the abdominopelvic cavity were analyzed by two readers and compared with the reference standard. Image quality was measured subjectively and objectively.

RESULTS

Focal lesion detection showed 96.5-100% sensitivity and 97.7-100% accuracy in all representative organs on low-dose CT with acceptable image quality; it showed 87.4% sensitivity and 97.9% accuracy in the liver and 80.0% sensitivity and 88.2% accuracy in the rectal shelf on ultralow-dose CT with suboptimal image quality. Indeterminate lesions were significantly more common in the liver, pancreas, and kidneys on ultralow-dose CT than on low-dose CT. Enlarged lymph nodes showed 100% sensitivity and accuracy on ultralow-dose CT. Mean effective radiation doses of low-dose CT and ultralow-dose CT were 2.6 mSv and 1.3 mSv, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic performance of low-dose CT is similar to that of standard-dose abdominopelvic CT with acceptable image quality. Ultralow-dose CT cannot safely assess focal liver, pancreas, kidneys, and rectal shelf lesions but may be useful for the evaluation of enlarged lymph nodes.