Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Pisa, Italy; Institute of Life Sciences, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
Institute of Life Sciences, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
Int J Cardiol. 2020 May 15;307:180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.02.028. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
In non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM), it is uncertain which late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) pattern, extent and location predict ventricular arrhythmias.
We analysed 183 NIDCM patients (73% men, median age 66 years) receiving an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention, undergoing cardiac magnetic resonance within 1 month before implantation. The primary endpoint was appropriate ICD shock, the secondary endpoint was a composite of appropriate ICD shock and cardiac death.
LGE was found in 116 patients (63%), accounting for 9% of LV mass (5-13%). Over a 30-month follow-up (10-65), 20 patients (11%) experienced the primary and 30 patients (16%) the secondary endpoint. LGE presence, inferior wall LGE, diffuse (≥2 wall) LGE, the number of segments with LGE, the number of segments with 50-75% transmural LGE, and percent LGE mass were univariate predictors of both endpoints. Also septal LGE predicted the primary, and lateral LGE predicted the secondary endpoint. LGE limited to right ventricular insertion points did not predict any endpoint. Percent LGE mass had an area under the curve of 0.734 for the primary endpoint, with 13% as the best cut-off (55% sensitivity, 86% specificity, 32% PPV, 94% NPV), conferring a 7-fold higher risk compared to patients with no LGE or LGE <13%. Survival free from both endpoints was significantly worse for patients with LGE ≥13%.
In patients with NIDCM receiving a defibrillator for primary prevention, LGE presence and extent predicted appropriate ICD shock and cardiac mortality; also specific LGE patterns and locations predicted a worse prognosis.
在非缺血性扩张型心肌病(NIDCM)中,尚不确定哪种延迟钆增强(LGE)模式、范围和位置可预测室性心律失常。
我们分析了 183 名接受植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)进行一级预防的 NIDCM 患者(73%为男性,中位年龄 66 岁),这些患者在植入前 1 个月内接受了心脏磁共振检查。主要终点是适当的 ICD 电击,次要终点是适当的 ICD 电击和心脏死亡的复合终点。
116 名患者(63%)发现有 LGE,占 LV 质量的 9%(5-13%)。在 30 个月的随访(10-65)中,20 名患者(11%)经历了主要终点,30 名患者(16%)经历了次要终点。LGE 的存在、下壁 LGE、弥漫性(≥2 壁)LGE、有 LGE 的节段数、有 50-75%透壁 LGE 的节段数和 LGE 质量百分比是两个终点的单变量预测因素。此外,间隔 LGE 预测了主要终点,外侧 LGE 预测了次要终点。局限于右心室插入点的 LGE 不预测任何终点。LGE 质量百分比对主要终点的曲线下面积为 0.734,13%为最佳截断值(55%敏感性,86%特异性,32%PPV,94%NPV),与无 LGE 或 LGE<13%的患者相比,风险增加 7 倍。与无 LGE 或 LGE<13%的患者相比,LGE≥13%的患者两个终点均无生存的比例显著更低。
在接受 ICD 一级预防的 NIDCM 患者中,LGE 的存在和范围可预测适当的 ICD 电击和心脏死亡率;特定的 LGE 模式和位置也可预测预后更差。