Claver Eduard, Di Marco Andrea, Brown Pamela Frances, Bradley Joshua, Nucifora Gaetano, Ruiz-Majoral Alejandro, Dallaglio Paolo Domenico, Rodriguez Marcos, Comin-Colet Josep, Anguera Ignasi, Miller Christopher A, Schmitt Matthias
Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Calle feixa llarga s/n, Barcelona 08907, Spain.
Bioheart-Cardiovascular Diseases Group, Cardiovascular, Respiratory and Systemic Diseases and Cellular Aging Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 Feb 17;24(3):346-353. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeac109.
To evaluate the baseline characteristics and the prognostic implications associated with late gadolinium enhancement limited to the right ventricular insertion points (IP-LGE) or present at both the right ventricular insertion points and the left ventricle (IP&LV-LGE) in non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).
This is a retrospective observational multicentre cohort study including 1165 consecutive patients with DCM evaluated by cardiac magnetic resonance. The primary endpoint included appropriate defibrillator therapies, sustained ventricular tachycardia, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or sudden death. The secondary outcome encompassed heart failure hospitalizations, heart transplant, left ventricular assist device implantation, and end-stage heart failure death. IP-LGE was found in 72 patients (6%), who had clinical characteristics closer to LGE- than to LGE+ patients. During follow-up (median 36 months), none of the IP-LGE patients experienced the primary endpoint. The cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint was similar between IP-LGE and LGE- patients (P = 1), while IP-LGE had significantly lower cumulative incidence when compared with LGE+ patients (P < 0.001). When compared with IP-LGE patients, the cumulative incidence of the secondary endpoint was similar in LGE- cases (P = 0.86) but tended to be higher in LGE+ patients (P = 0.06). Both clinical characteristics and outcomes were similar between IP&LV-LGE patients and the rest of LGE+ cases.
In a large cohort of DCM patients, IP-LGE was associated with similar outcome when compared with LGE- patients and with significant lower risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death when compared with LGE+ cases. Patients with IP&LV-LGE had clinical characteristics and outcomes similar to the rest of LGE+ cases.
评估非缺血性扩张型心肌病(DCM)中,仅右心室插入点延迟钆增强(IP-LGE)或右心室插入点和左心室均出现延迟钆增强(IP&LV-LGE)的基线特征及预后意义。
这是一项回顾性观察性多中心队列研究,纳入1165例连续的DCM患者,均接受了心脏磁共振评估。主要终点包括适当的除颤器治疗、持续性室性心动过速、心脏骤停复苏或猝死。次要结局包括心力衰竭住院、心脏移植、左心室辅助装置植入及终末期心力衰竭死亡。72例患者(6%)存在IP-LGE,其临床特征更接近无延迟钆增强(LGE-)患者而非有延迟钆增强(LGE+)患者。在随访期间(中位时间36个月),IP-LGE患者均未发生主要终点事件。IP-LGE患者与LGE-患者的主要终点累积发生率相似(P = 1),而与LGE+患者相比,IP-LGE患者的累积发生率显著更低(P < 0.001)。与IP-LGE患者相比,LGE-患者的次要终点累积发生率相似(P = 0.86),而LGE+患者的次要终点累积发生率则有升高趋势(P = 0.06)。IP&LV-LGE患者与其他LGE+患者的临床特征及结局相似。
在一大群DCM患者中,与LGE-患者相比,IP-LGE患者的结局相似;与LGE+患者相比,IP-LGE患者发生室性心律失常和猝死的风险显著更低。IP&LV-LGE患者的临床特征及结局与其他LGE+患者相似。