• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人直肠癌手术优于腹腔镜手术:来自大型回顾性队列的结果。

Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer Provides Advantageous Outcomes Over Laparoscopic Approach: Results From a Large Retrospective Cohort.

机构信息

Division of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Division of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):e1218-e1222. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003805.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000003805
PMID:32068552
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare short term outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic rectal cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND

Significant benefits of robotic rectal cancer surgery over laparoscopy have yet to be demonstrated. Operative time and direct institutional cost seem in favor of the laparoscopic approach.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients operated on for rectal cancer with a mini-invasive approach at Mayo Clinic from 2005 to 2018. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the difference in postoperative morbidity between the laparoscopic and robotic approach. Multivariable models for odds to complications and prolonged (≥6 days) length of stay were built.

RESULTS

A total of 600 patients were included in the analysis. The number of patients undergoing robotic surgery was 317 (52.8%). The 2 groups were similar in respect to age, sex, and body mass index. Laparoscopic surgery was correlated to shorter operative time (214 vs 324 minutes; P < 0.001). Patients undergoing robotic surgery had a lower overall complications rate (37.2% vs 51.2%; P < 0.001). Robotic surgery was found to be the most protective factor [odds ratio (OR) 0.485; P = 0.006] for odds to complications. The event of a complication (OR 9.33; P < 0.001) and conversion to open surgery (OR 3.095; P = 0.002) were identified as risk factors for prolonged length of stay whereas robotic surgery (OR 0.62; P = 0.027) was the only independent protective factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic rectal cancer surgery is strongly associated with better short-term outcomes over laparoscopic surgery.

摘要

目的

比较腹腔镜和机器人直肠肿瘤手术患者的短期预后。

背景

机器人直肠肿瘤手术相较于腹腔镜具有显著优势,但目前尚未得到证实。手术时间和直接机构成本似乎更倾向于腹腔镜方法。

方法

我们对梅奥诊所 2005 年至 2018 年间接受微创直肠肿瘤手术的连续患者进行了回顾性研究。本研究的主要目的是探讨腹腔镜和机器人方法之间术后发病率的差异。建立了并发症和延长(≥6 天)住院时间的多变量模型。

结果

共纳入 600 例患者进行分析。317 例(52.8%)患者接受机器人手术。两组在年龄、性别和体重指数方面相似。腹腔镜手术与较短的手术时间相关(214 分钟 vs 324 分钟;P<0.001)。机器人手术患者的总并发症发生率较低(37.2% vs 51.2%;P<0.001)。机器人手术是并发症发生率的最保护因素(比值比 0.485;P=0.006)。并发症的发生(比值比 9.33;P<0.001)和转为开放性手术(比值比 3.095;P=0.002)是延长住院时间的危险因素,而机器人手术(比值比 0.62;P=0.027)是唯一的独立保护因素。

结论

机器人直肠肿瘤手术与腹腔镜手术相比,具有更好的短期预后。

相似文献

1
Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer Provides Advantageous Outcomes Over Laparoscopic Approach: Results From a Large Retrospective Cohort.机器人直肠癌手术优于腹腔镜手术:来自大型回顾性队列的结果。
Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):e1218-e1222. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003805.
2
Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients.肥胖患者的机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜直肠癌手术
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Nov;18(11):1063-1071. doi: 10.1111/codi.13374.
3
Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.机器人与腹腔镜直肠切除术用于保留肛门手术:单中心 130 例连续患者的病理和短期结果分析。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4085-4091. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5455-7. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
4
Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗中低位直肠癌的短期及肿瘤学结局比较
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jul;31(7):2798-2807. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5289-8. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
5
Robotic vs laparoscopic rectal surgery in high-risk patients.机器人与腹腔镜直肠手术治疗高危患者的比较。
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Dec;19(12):1092-1099. doi: 10.1111/codi.13783.
6
Does Robot Overcome Obesity-related Limitations of Minimally Invasive Rectal Surgery for Cancer?机器人能否克服肥胖相关的直肠癌微创手术局限性?
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2018 Feb;28(1):e8-e11. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000500.
7
Robotic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients may lead to better short-term outcomes when compared to laparoscopy: a comparative propensity scored match study.与腹腔镜手术相比,肥胖患者的机器人直肠癌手术可能会带来更好的短期疗效:一项倾向性评分匹配比较研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Aug;33(8):1079-1086. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3030-x. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
8
Does prolonged operative time impact postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing robotic-assisted rectal resection for cancer?行机器人辅助直肠癌切除术的患者,手术时间延长是否会影响术后发病率?
Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug;32(8):3659-3666. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6098-z. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
9
Operative and long-term oncological outcomes in patients undergoing robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.接受机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌患者的手术及长期肿瘤学结局
Int J Med Robot. 2020 Dec;16(6):1-10. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2168. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
10
Comparison of clinical and economic outcomes between robotic, laparoscopic, and open rectal cancer surgery: early experience at a tertiary care center.机器人辅助、腹腔镜和开放直肠癌手术的临床及经济结果比较:三级医疗中心的早期经验
Surg Endosc. 2016 Apr;30(4):1337-43. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4390-8. Epub 2015 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative effectiveness and short-term outcomes of the KangDuo and da Vinci robotic platforms in colorectal cancer surgery.康多机器人平台与达芬奇机器人平台在结直肠癌手术中的比较效果及短期预后的系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Sep 4;19(1):556. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02743-1.
2
Current Evidence in Robotic Colorectal Surgery.机器人结直肠手术的当前证据
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 29;17(15):2503. doi: 10.3390/cancers17152503.
3
Simultaneous robotic-assisted prostatectomy and rectal resection: a systematic review.
同步机器人辅助前列腺切除术和直肠切除术:一项系统评价
J Robot Surg. 2025 May 23;19(1):229. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02395-1.
4
Clinical significance of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a retrospective propensity score matching analysis.机器人辅助腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌的临床意义:一项回顾性倾向评分匹配分析
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 May 21;410(1):165. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03734-4.
5
Combined TaTME with SP Robot for Low Anterior Resection in Rectal Cancer: rSPa TaTME.经括约肌间入路全直肠系膜切除术联合SP机器人用于直肠癌低位前切除术:rSPa TaTME
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 15;17(8):1328. doi: 10.3390/cancers17081328.
6
Short-term outcomes of KangDuo surgical robot- versus Da Vinci surgical robot-assisted radical resection of colorectal cancer: a prospective cohort study.康多手术机器人与达芬奇手术机器人辅助根治性切除结直肠癌的短期结局:一项前瞻性队列研究
BMC Surg. 2025 Apr 16;25(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02892-y.
7
Transanal vs Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision and 3-Year Disease-Free Survival in Rectal Cancer: The TaLaR Randomized Clinical Trial.经肛门与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术及直肠癌3年无病生存率:TaLaR随机临床试验
JAMA. 2025 Mar 4;333(9):774-783. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.24276.
8
Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes between high and low tie ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in robotic rectal cancer surgery: a propensity score matching analysis.机器人直肠癌手术中肠系膜下动脉高位与低位结扎的短期手术结局比较:一项倾向评分匹配分析
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jan 4;19(1):41. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02209-w.
9
Robotic surgery may lead to reduced postoperative inflammatory stress in colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.机器人手术可能会减轻结肠癌术后的炎症应激:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Ann Coloproctol. 2024 Dec;40(6):594-601. doi: 10.3393/ac.2024.00171.0024. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
10
Key steps in exposure techniques for robotic total mesorectal excision (TME).机器人全直肠系膜切除术(TME)暴露技术的关键步骤。
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Dec 30;29(1):35. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-03064-5.