Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Industrial & Systems Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2020 Feb-Mar;17(2-3):85-96. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2020.1717502. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
Agricultural work is associated with increased risk of adverse musculoskeletal health outcomes. The purpose of this study was to quantify exposure to biomechanical factors among a sample (n = 55) of farmers in the Midwest region of the U.S. while they performed a variety of routine agricultural activities, and to compare exposure levels between these activities. Surface electromyography was used to estimate activity levels of the erector spinae, upper trapezius, forearm flexor, and forearm extensor muscle groups. Simultaneously, inertial sensors were used to measure kinematics of the trunk, upper arm, and wrist. In general, lower muscle activity levels, less extreme postures, and slower movement speeds were observed during activities that involved primarily the use of agricultural machinery in comparison to manual activities, suggesting a potential advantage of mechanization relative to musculoskeletal health. Median wrist movement speeds exceeding recently proposed exposure thresholds were also observed during many manual activities, such as milking animals and repairing equipment. Upper arm postures and movement speeds did not appear to confer excessive risk for shoulder-related outcomes (on the whole), but interpretation of the results is limited by a sampling approach that may not have captured the full extent of exposure variation. Not surprisingly, substantial variation in exposure levels were observed within each agricultural activity, which is related to substantial variation in the equipment, tools, and work practices used by participants. Ultimately, the results of this study contribute to an emerging literature in which the physical demands of routine agricultural work have been described on the basis of sensor-based measurements rather than more common self-report or observation-based approaches.
农业工作与不良肌肉骨骼健康结果的风险增加有关。本研究的目的是量化美国中西部地区的一组(n=55)农民在进行各种常规农业活动时的生物力学因素暴露情况,并比较这些活动之间的暴露水平。表面肌电图用于估计脊柱伸肌、上斜方肌、前臂屈肌和前臂伸肌肌群的活动水平。同时,惯性传感器用于测量躯干、上臂和手腕的运动学。一般来说,与手动活动相比,主要涉及农业机械使用的活动中观察到较低的肌肉活动水平、较少的极端姿势和较慢的运动速度,这表明机械化相对于肌肉骨骼健康具有潜在优势。在许多手动活动中,如挤奶动物和修理设备时,也观察到中位手腕运动速度超过最近提出的暴露阈值。虽然上臂姿势和运动速度似乎没有为肩部相关结果带来过高风险(总体而言),但结果的解释受到采样方法的限制,这种方法可能没有捕捉到暴露变化的全部范围。毫不奇怪,在每项农业活动中都观察到暴露水平的显著差异,这与参与者使用的设备、工具和工作实践的显著差异有关。最终,这项研究的结果有助于新兴文献的发展,其中常规农业工作的体力需求是基于基于传感器的测量而不是更常见的自我报告或观察方法来描述的。