Université Laval, Pavillon Palasis Prince, 2325 Rue de la Terrasse, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Département d'Administration de la santé, University of Montréal, 7101 Avenue Parc, Montréal, Québec, H3N 1X7, Canada.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Feb 18;18(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0525-z.
Health research has scientific, social and political impacts. To achieve such impacts, several institutions need to participate; however, health research funding institutions are seldom nominated in the literature as essential players. The attention they have received has so far focused mainly on their role in knowledge translation, informing policy-making and the need to organise health research systems. In this article, we will focus solely on the governance of national health research funding institutions. Our objectives are to identify the main functions of governance for such institutions and actionable governance functions. This research should be useful in several ways, including in highlighting, tracking and measuring the governance trends in a given funding institution, and to forestall low-level governance.
First, we reviewed existing frameworks in the grey literature, selecting seven relevant documents. Second, we developed an integrated framework for health research funding institution governance and management. Third, we extracted actionable information for governance by selecting a mix of North American, European and Asian institutions that had documentation available in English (e.g. annual report, legal status, strategy).
The framework contains 13 functions - 5 dedicated to governance (intelligence acquisition, resourcing and instrumentation, relationships management, accountability and performance, and strategy formulation), 3 dedicated to management (priority-setting, financing and knowledge transfer), and 5 dedicated to transversal logics that apply to both governance and management (ethics, transparency, capacity reinforcement, monitoring and evaluation, and public engagement).
Herein, we provide a conceptual contribution for scholars in the field of governance and health research as well as a practical contribution, with actionable functions for high-level managers in charge of the governance of health research funding institutions.
健康研究具有科学、社会和政治影响。为了实现这些影响,需要有几个机构参与;然而,健康研究资助机构在文献中很少被提名作为重要参与者。迄今为止,人们对它们的关注主要集中在它们在知识转化、为决策提供信息以及组织健康研究系统方面的作用。在本文中,我们将仅关注国家健康研究资助机构的治理。我们的目标是确定这些机构治理的主要职能和可操作的治理职能。这项研究将在几个方面有用,包括突出、跟踪和衡量给定资助机构的治理趋势,并防止低水平的治理。
首先,我们在灰色文献中回顾了现有的框架,选择了七份相关文件。其次,我们为健康研究资助机构的治理和管理制定了一个综合框架。第三,我们通过选择一些有英文文件(如年度报告、法律地位、战略)的北美、欧洲和亚洲机构,提取出可操作的治理信息。
该框架包含 13 项职能 - 5 项专门用于治理(情报收集、资源和仪器、关系管理、问责制和绩效、战略制定),3 项专门用于管理(优先事项设定、融资和知识转移),5 项专门用于适用于治理和管理的横向逻辑(道德、透明度、能力强化、监测和评估、公众参与)。
在这里,我们为治理和健康研究领域的学者提供了一个概念上的贡献,以及一个实用的贡献,为负责健康研究资助机构治理的高级管理人员提供了可操作的职能。