• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

插入非锁定螺钉时的手术操作:一项系统评价

Surgical performance when inserting non-locking screws: a systematic review.

作者信息

Fletcher James W A, Wenzel Lisa, Neumann Verena, Richards R Geoff, Gueorguiev Boyko, Gill Harinderjit S, Preatoni Ezio, Whitehouse Michael R

机构信息

Department for Health, University of Bath, UK.

AO Research Institute Davos, Switzerland.

出版信息

EFORT Open Rev. 2020 Jan 29;5(1):26-36. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.180066. eCollection 2020 Jan.

DOI:10.1302/2058-5241.5.180066
PMID:32071771
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7017595/
Abstract

Billions of screws are inserted by surgeons each year, making them the most commonly inserted implant. When using non-locking screws, insertion technique is decided by the surgeon, including how much to tighten each screw. The aims of this study were to assess, through a systematic review, the screw tightness and rate of material stripping produced by surgeons and the effect of different variables related to screw insertion.Twelve studies were included, with 260 surgeons inserting a total of 2793 screws; an average of 11 screws each, although only 1510 screws have been inserted by 145 surgeons where tightness was measured - average tightness was 78±10% for cortical ( = 1079) and 80±6% for cancellous screw insertions ( = 431).An average of 26% of all inserted screws irreparably damaged and stripped screw holes, reducing the construct pullout strength. Furthermore, awareness of bone stripping is very poor, meaning that screws must be considerably overtightened before a surgeon will typically detect it.Variation between individual surgeons' ability to optimally insert screws was seen, with some surgeons stripping more than 90% of samples and others hardly any. Contradictory findings were seen for the relationship between the tightness achieved and bone density.The optimum tightness for screws remains unknown, thus subjectively chosen screw tightness, which varies greatly, remains without an established target to generate the best possible construct for any given situation. Work is needed to establish these targets, and to develop methods to accurately and repeatably achieve them. Cite this article: 2020;5:26-36. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.180066.

摘要

每年外科医生要植入数十亿颗螺钉,使其成为最常植入的植入物。使用非锁定螺钉时,植入技术由外科医生决定,包括每颗螺钉拧紧的程度。本研究的目的是通过系统评价,评估外科医生植入螺钉时的拧紧程度和材料剥离率,以及与螺钉植入相关的不同变量的影响。纳入了12项研究,260名外科医生共植入2793颗螺钉;平均每人植入11颗,不过只有145名外科医生植入的1510颗螺钉测量了拧紧程度——皮质骨螺钉植入时平均拧紧程度为78±10%( = 1079),松质骨螺钉植入时为80±6%( = 431)。所有植入螺钉中平均有26%造成了无法修复的损坏并使螺孔剥离,降低了结构的拔出强度。此外,对骨剥离的认知非常不足,这意味着在外科医生通常能检测到之前,螺钉必须过度拧紧。观察到不同外科医生最佳植入螺钉的能力存在差异,一些外科医生的样本剥离率超过90%,而另一些几乎没有。对于所达到的拧紧程度与骨密度之间的关系,存在相互矛盾的研究结果。螺钉的最佳拧紧程度仍然未知,因此主观选择的拧紧程度差异很大,在任何给定情况下,都没有既定目标来生成最佳结构。需要开展工作来确定这些目标,并开发准确且可重复实现这些目标的方法。引用本文:2020;5:26 - 36。DOI:10.1302/2058 - 5241.5.180066。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/810c/7017595/a08c7e702b96/eor-5-26-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/810c/7017595/222cf87ad10f/eor-5-26-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/810c/7017595/5a24df576241/eor-5-26-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/810c/7017595/a08c7e702b96/eor-5-26-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/810c/7017595/222cf87ad10f/eor-5-26-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/810c/7017595/5a24df576241/eor-5-26-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/810c/7017595/a08c7e702b96/eor-5-26-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Surgical performance when inserting non-locking screws: a systematic review.插入非锁定螺钉时的手术操作:一项系统评价
EFORT Open Rev. 2020 Jan 29;5(1):26-36. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.180066. eCollection 2020 Jan.
2
Variations in non-locking screw insertion conditions generate unpredictable changes to achieved fixation tightness and stripping rates.非锁定螺钉插入条件的变化会导致固定牢固度和螺钉脱出率产生不可预测的变化。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2020 Dec;80:105201. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105201. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
3
Screw tightness and stripping rates vary between biomechanical researchers and practicing orthopaedic surgeons.不同生物力学研究人员和骨科医生之间的螺钉拧紧扭矩和螺钉滑丝率存在差异。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Oct 26;16(1):642. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02800-z.
4
Stripping torques in human bone can be reliably predicted prior to screw insertion with optimum tightness being found between 70% and 80% of the maximum.在拧入螺钉之前,可以可靠地预测人体骨骼中的剥离扭矩,最佳拧紧度在最大值的70%至80%之间。
Bone Joint Res. 2020 Sep 3;9(8):493-500. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.98.BJR-2019-0318.R1. eCollection 2020 Aug.
5
Surgeon perception of cancellous screw fixation.外科医生对松质骨螺钉固定的感知。
J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Jan;28(1):e1-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31829ef63b.
6
Effects of surgical errors on small fragment screw fixation.手术失误对小碎片螺钉固定的影响。
J Orthop Trauma. 2006 Jul;20(6):410-3. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200607000-00008.
7
Non-locking screw insertion: No benefit seen if tightness exceeds 80% of the maximum torque.非锁定螺钉植入:如果拧紧程度超过最大扭矩的80%,则看不到任何益处。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2019 Dec;70:40-45. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
8
Augmented screwdrivers can increase the performance of orthopaedic surgeons compared with use of normal screwdrivers.增强型螺丝刀可提高矫形外科医生的手术表现,优于使用普通螺丝刀。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 22;12(1):20076. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24646-z.
9
The biomechanical effect of artificial and human bone density on stopping and stripping torque during screw insertion.人工骨密度和人体骨密度对螺钉植入过程中制动扭矩和拧出扭矩的生物力学影响。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013 Jun;22:146-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
10
Screw Stripping After Repeated Cortical Screw Insertion-Can We Trust the Cancellous "Bailout" Screw?反复插入皮质骨螺钉后螺钉脱出——我们能信赖松质骨“补救”螺钉吗?
J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Dec;30(12):682-686. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000685.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence and complications of orthopaedic screw protrusion.骨科螺钉突出的发生率及并发症
EFORT Open Rev. 2025 Jun 30;10(7):562-569. doi: 10.1530/EOR-2024-0147.
2
The Comparison Between 3.5- and 4.5-mm T-plates for Management of the Patients with Schatzker Type II Tibial Plateau Fractures that Referred to our Emergency Department: A Clinical Trial.3.5毫米与4.5毫米T形钢板治疗我院急诊科收治的Schatzker II型胫骨平台骨折患者的比较:一项临床试验
Adv Biomed Res. 2023 Aug 31;12:206. doi: 10.4103/abr.abr_40_23. eCollection 2023.
3
Biomechanical Variability and Usability of a Novel Customizable Fracture Fixation Technique.

本文引用的文献

1
Juvenile bovine bone is an appropriate surrogate for normal and reduced density human bone in biomechanical testing: a validation study.幼年牛骨是生物力学测试中正常和低骨密度人骨的合适替代物:验证研究。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 5;8(1):10181. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28155-w.
2
Effect of Real-Time Feedback on Screw Placement Into Synthetic Cancellous Bone.实时反馈对螺钉植入人工松质骨的影响。
J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Aug;30(8):e279-84. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000564.
3
Two-Finger Tightness: What Is It? Measuring Torque and Reproducibility in a Simulated Model.
一种新型可定制骨折固定技术的生物力学变异性与可用性
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Sep 29;10(10):1146. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10101146.
4
Biomechanical Investigation of Bone Screw Head Design for Extracting Stripped Screw Heads: Integration of Mechanical Tests and Finite Element Analyses.用于取出滑丝螺钉头部的骨螺钉头部设计的生物力学研究:机械测试与有限元分析的结合
Materials (Basel). 2023 Aug 4;16(15):5470. doi: 10.3390/ma16155470.
5
Augmented screwdrivers can increase the performance of orthopaedic surgeons compared with use of normal screwdrivers.增强型螺丝刀可提高矫形外科医生的手术表现,优于使用普通螺丝刀。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 22;12(1):20076. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24646-z.
6
Reliability and accuracy of the torque applied to osteosynthesis screws by maxillofacial surgeons and residents.颌面外科医生和住院医师施加于骨螺钉的扭矩的可靠性和准确性。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 24;12(1):14411. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18687-7.
7
Screw tightness and stripping rates vary between biomechanical researchers and practicing orthopaedic surgeons.不同生物力学研究人员和骨科医生之间的螺钉拧紧扭矩和螺钉滑丝率存在差异。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Oct 26;16(1):642. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02800-z.
8
Salvaging Pull-Out Strength in a Previously Stripped Screw Site: A Comparison of Three Rescue Techniques.挽救先前拧出螺钉部位的拔出力:三种挽救技术的比较。
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2021 Aug 27;6(3):71. doi: 10.3390/jfmk6030071.
9
Stripping torques in human bone can be reliably predicted prior to screw insertion with optimum tightness being found between 70% and 80% of the maximum.在拧入螺钉之前,可以可靠地预测人体骨骼中的剥离扭矩,最佳拧紧度在最大值的70%至80%之间。
Bone Joint Res. 2020 Sep 3;9(8):493-500. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.98.BJR-2019-0318.R1. eCollection 2020 Aug.
两指紧密度:是什么?在模拟模型中测量扭矩和再现性。
J Orthop Trauma. 2016 May;30(5):273-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000506.
4
"Turn-of-the-Nut" Method Is Not Appropriate for Use in Cancellous Bone.“拧螺母”方法不适用于松质骨。
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Nov;29(11):e437-41. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000385.
5
Pullout strength of cancellous screws in human femoral heads depends on applied insertion torque, trabecular bone microarchitecture and areal bone mineral density.松质骨螺钉在人股骨头中的拔出强度取决于施加的插入扭矩、小梁骨微结构和骨面积密度。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014 Dec;40:354-361. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.09.009. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
6
Screw insertion in osteoporotic bone: turn-of-the-nut and torque-based techniques provide similar resistance to bone plate slippage.骨质疏松性骨中螺钉的植入:螺母旋转法和基于扭矩的技术对骨板滑动的抵抗力相似。
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Feb;29(2):e65-8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000160.
7
Can the "turn-of-the-nut" method improve cortical screw fixation?“拧螺母”方法能否改善皮质骨螺钉固定?
J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Apr;28(4):195-9. doi: 10.1097/01.bot.0000435631.71393.60.
8
Biomechanical measurements of stopping and stripping torques during screw insertion in five types of human and artificial humeri.五种类型的人体和人工肱骨在螺钉植入过程中制动和拧除扭矩的生物力学测量。
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2014 May;228(5):446-455. doi: 10.1177/0954411914529946. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
9
How repeatable is two-finger tightness when used to tighten bone screws?使用双指拧紧骨螺钉时,其拧紧力度的可重复性如何?
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2014 Nov;39(9):1007-8. doi: 10.1177/1753193413504370. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
10
Surgeon perception of cancellous screw fixation.外科医生对松质骨螺钉固定的感知。
J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Jan;28(1):e1-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31829ef63b.