Everett Alyssa, Wong Aileen, Piper Rosie, Cone Barbara, Marrone Nicole
Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson.
Mariposa Community Health Center, Nogales, AZ.
Am J Audiol. 2020 Mar 5;29(1):35-49. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJA-19-00053. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
Purpose The purpose of this study is to determine the sensitivities and specificities of different audiometric hearing screening criteria and single-item and multi-item hearing disability questionnaires among a group of Spanish-speaking adults in a rural community. Method Participants were 131 predominantly older (77% 65+ years) Hispanic/Latinx adults (98%). A structured Spanish-language interview and pure-tone threshold test data were analyzed for each participant. The sensitivities and specificities of three single questions and the Hearing Handicap Index for the Elderly-Screening (HHIE-S; Ventry & Weinstein, 1983) in Spanish, as well as three audiometric screening criteria, were evaluated in relation to the pure-tone threshold test for detecting hearing loss. Results Sensitivity and specificity of audiometric screening criteria varied, but the highest sensitivity was found for the criterion of > 25 dB HL at 1-4 kHz in either ear. The single self-perception question, " ( was shown to be the most sensitive self-report screening compared to other single-item questions and the HHIE-S. This single question was as sensitive as an audiometric screening to detect a moderate hearing loss (> 40 dB HL in either ear). Results from the Spanish HHIE-S indicated poor performance to detect hearing loss in this population, consistent with previous research. Conclusions Among older Spanish-speaking adults, self-reported hearing status had varying sensitivities depending on the question asked. However, of the tools evaluated, the self-perception question proved to be a more sensitive and specific tool than a multi-item screen. Objective audiometric testing (> 25 dB HL) resulted in the highest sensitivity to detect a mild hearing loss.
目的 本研究的目的是确定在一个农村社区中,一组讲西班牙语的成年人中不同听力筛查标准以及单项和多项听力残疾问卷的敏感性和特异性。方法 参与者为131名主要为老年人(77%年龄在65岁及以上)的西班牙裔/拉丁裔成年人(98%)。对每位参与者进行了结构化的西班牙语访谈和纯音阈值测试数据分析。评估了三个单项问题以及西班牙语版的老年人听力障碍指数筛查量表(HHIE-S;Ventry & Weinstein,1983)的敏感性和特异性,以及三种听力筛查标准与检测听力损失的纯音阈值测试的相关性。结果 听力筛查标准的敏感性和特异性各不相同,但在单耳1-4kHz处>25dB HL的标准具有最高的敏感性。与其他单项问题和HHIE-S相比,单项自我认知问题“(此处原文缺失具体内容)”被证明是最敏感的自我报告筛查方式。这个单项问题在检测中度听力损失(单耳>40dB HL)方面与听力筛查一样敏感。西班牙语版HHIE-S的结果表明,在该人群中检测听力损失的表现不佳,这与先前的研究一致。结论 在讲西班牙语的老年成年人中,自我报告的听力状况根据所问问题的不同而具有不同的敏感性。然而,在所评估的工具中,自我认知问题被证明是比多项筛查更敏感和特异的工具。客观听力测试(>25dB HL)在检测轻度听力损失方面具有最高的敏感性。