University of Illinois at Chicago (Drs Martin, Bisarini, Weinstein, and Walton and Ms Rosales); Erie Family Health Center, Chicago, Illinois (Dr Roy); and Northshore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois (Dr Mosnaim).
J Ambul Care Manage. 2020 Apr-Jun;43(2):125-135. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0000000000000326.
This study characterized and compared the implementation of clinically integrated community health workers (CHWs) to a certified asthma educator (AE-C) for low-income children with asthma. In the AE-C arm (N = 115), 51.3% completed at least one in-clinic education session. In the CHW arm (N = 108), 722 home visits were completed. The median number of visits was 7 (range, 0-17). Scheduled in-clinic asthma education may not be the optimal intervention for this patient population. CHW visit completion rates suggest that the schedule, location, and content of CHW asthma services better met patients' needs. Seven to 10 visits seemed to be the preferred CHW dose.
本研究对临床整合社区卫生工作者(CHW)与认证哮喘教育者(AE-C)为低收入哮喘儿童实施的情况进行了描述和比较。在 AE-C 组(N=115)中,51.3%的人至少完成了一次门诊教育课程。在 CHW 组(N=108)中,完成了 722 次家访。家访的中位数为 7 次(范围为 0-17 次)。为该患者群体安排门诊哮喘教育可能不是最佳干预措施。CHW 家访完成率表明,CHW 哮喘服务的计划、地点和内容更好地满足了患者的需求。7 至 10 次家访似乎是 CHW 的最佳剂量。