Suppr超能文献

磷虾油与鱼油的调脂作用比较:网状荟萃分析。

Lipid-modifying effects of krill oil vs fish oil: a network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Graduate School of Clinical Pharmacy, CHA University, Pocheon, Republic of Korea.

College of Pharmacy, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Nutr Rev. 2020 Sep 1;78(9):699-708. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuz102.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Krill oil is a good source of n-3 phospholipids and has greater bioavailability than fish oil, which contains n-3 triglycerides. However, it is unclear whether krill oil affects circulating lipid concentrations more beneficially than fish oil.

OBJECTIVE

A network meta-analysis was conducted to compare the lipid-modifying effects of krill oil and fish oil.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and Embase databases were searched.

STUDY SELECTION

A total of 64 randomized controlled trials that determined the lipid-modifying effects of krill oil or fish oil were selected.

DATA EXTRACTION

The MetaXL program was used for meta-analysis. A subgroup analysis and a network meta-regression were conducted to investigate the dose-response effect of the n-3 fatty acid content of fish oil and krill oil.

RESULTS

Krill oil was associated with significantly lower triglyceride levels than control supplements (weighted mean difference [WMD] -23.26 [95%CI, -38.84 to -7.69]). However, the net differences in triglycerides (WMD -4.07 [95%CI, -15.22 to 7.08]), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (WMD 3.01 [95%CI, -5.49 to 11.51]), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (WMD 1.37 [95%CI, -3.73 to 6.48]), and total cholesterol (WMD 1.69 [95%CI, -6.62 to 10.01]) were not significantly different between the krill oil and fish oil groups. One gram of n-3 fatty acids contained in fish oil and krill oil lowered median triglycerides by 8.971 mg/dL (95% credible interval [CrI], 2.27 to 14.04) and 9.838 mg/dL (95%CrI, 0.72 to 19.40), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The lipid-modifying effects of krill oil and fish oil do not differ. The reduction in triglycerides depends on the dose of n-3 fatty acids consumed.

摘要

背景

磷虾油是 n-3 磷脂的良好来源,其生物利用度高于含有 n-3 甘油三酯的鱼油。然而,目前尚不清楚磷虾油是否比鱼油更能有益地影响循环脂质浓度。

目的

进行网络荟萃分析以比较磷虾油和鱼油的调脂效果。

数据来源

检索了 PubMed 和 Embase 数据库。

研究选择

共选择了 64 项随机对照试验,以确定磷虾油或鱼油的调脂效果。

数据提取

使用 MetaXL 程序进行荟萃分析。进行亚组分析和网络荟萃回归,以研究鱼油和磷虾油中 n-3 脂肪酸含量的剂量反应效应。

结果

与对照补充剂相比,磷虾油可显著降低甘油三酯水平(加权均数差 [WMD] -23.26 [95%CI,-38.84 至-7.69])。然而,甘油三酯的净差异(WMD -4.07 [95%CI,-15.22 至 7.08])、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(WMD 3.01 [95%CI,-5.49 至 11.51])、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(WMD 1.37 [95%CI,-3.73 至 6.48])和总胆固醇(WMD 1.69 [95%CI,-6.62 至 10.01])在磷虾油和鱼油组之间无显著差异。鱼油和磷虾油中每克 n-3 脂肪酸可使甘油三酯中位数分别降低 8.971mg/dL(95%可信区间 [CrI],2.27 至 14.04)和 9.838mg/dL(95%CrI,0.72 至 19.40)。

结论

磷虾油和鱼油的调脂效果没有差异。甘油三酯的减少取决于所消耗的 n-3 脂肪酸剂量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验