Nie Kun-Xi, Wang Chan, Li Xin-Wu
Shihezi University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Inquiry. 2020 Jan-Dec;57:46958020907788. doi: 10.1177/0046958020907788.
Big infectious diseases do harm to the whole society, and it is highly crucial to control them on time. The major purpose of this article is to theoretically demonstrate that the Chinese government's intervention in large-scale infectious diseases is successful and efficient. Two potential strategies were considered: strategy 1 was infectious disease without government intervention, and strategy 2 was infectious disease with government intervention. By evolution model, this article illustrates the efficiency of big infectious disease reimbursement policy in China. Without government reimbursement, this article finds that high expenditures accelerate the disease infection. The number of infected persons decreases under big infectious disease reimbursement policy in China. The higher the treatment costs, the more important the government intervention. Big infectious disease reimbursement policy in China can serve as an efficient example to cope with big infectious diseases.
重大传染病对整个社会造成危害，及时控制至关重要。本文的主要目的是从理论上证明中国政府对大规模传染病的干预是成功且有效的。考虑了两种潜在策略：策略1是无政府干预的传染病情况，策略2是有政府干预的传染病情况。通过演化模型，本文阐述了中国重大传染病报销政策的有效性。在没有政府报销的情况下，本文发现高支出会加速疾病传播。在中国重大传染病报销政策下，感染人数会减少。治疗成本越高，政府干预就越重要。中国的重大传染病报销政策可以作为应对重大传染病的一个有效范例。
