Institute of Exercise Training and Sport Informatics, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Jul;73(7):1055-1065. doi: 10.1177/1747021820911324. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
Much research has been conducted on the determinants of inattentional blindness-the failure to miss an unexpected but salient stimulus in plain view. Far less research has been concerned with the fate of those objects that go unnoticed in such a setting. The available evidence suggests that objects that are not consciously noticed due to inattentional blindness are still processed to a certain degree. The present study substantiated and generalised this limited evidence by reanalysing 16 datasets in regard to participants' guessing accuracy in multiple-choice questions concerning the unexpected object: Participants who did not notice the critical object showed guessing accuracy that lay significantly above chance. Thus, stimuli that are not consciously noticed (i.e., cannot be reported) can nevertheless exert an influence on seemingly random choices. Modality of the primary task as well as performance in the primary task and in a divided-attention trial were evaluated as potential moderators. Methodological limitations such as the design and implementation of the multiple-choice questions and the generalisability of our findings are discussed, and promises of the present approach for future studies are presented.
大量研究致力于探究注意盲(即未能注意到明显但出乎意料的刺激)的决定因素。而较少的研究关注那些在这种情况下被忽视的物体的命运。现有证据表明,由于注意盲而未被有意识注意到的物体仍在一定程度上被处理。本研究通过重新分析 16 个数据集来证实和推广这一有限的证据,这些数据集涉及参与者对多项选择题中意外物体的猜测准确性:没有注意到关键物体的参与者的猜测准确性显著高于随机水平。因此,虽然没有被有意识地注意到的刺激(即无法报告),但它们仍然可以对看似随机的选择产生影响。主要任务的模态以及主要任务和分散注意试验中的表现被评估为潜在的调节因素。讨论了方法学限制,如多项选择题的设计和实施,以及我们发现的普遍性,并提出了本研究方法对未来研究的应用前景。