Suppr超能文献

全神贯注试验中的无意视盲:我们是否因噎废食了?

Inattentional blindness on the full-attention trial: Are we throwing out the baby with the bathwater?

作者信息

White Rebekah C, Davies Martin, Aimola Davies Anne M

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Conscious Cogn. 2018 Mar;59:64-77. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.10.002. Epub 2018 Jan 9.

Abstract

When attention is otherwise engaged, observers may experience inattentional blindness, failing to notice objects or events that are presented in plain sight. In an inattentional blindness experiment, an unexpectedstimulus ispresented alongside primary-task stimuli, and its detection is probed. We evaluate a criterion that is commonly used to exclude observers from the data analysis. On the final experimental trial, observers do not perform the primary task, but instead look for anything new. Observers who fail to report the unexpected stimulus on thisfull-attention trialare excluded. On the basis of 4 hypothetical experiments and a review of 128 actual experiments from the literature, we demonstrate some potentially problematic consequences of implementing the full-attention-trial exclusion criterion. Excluded observers may cluster in experimental conditions and the exclusion criterion may lead researchers to understate the pervasiveness of inattentional blindness. It may even render usblindto inattentional blindness on the full-attention trial.

摘要

当注意力集中在其他事情上时,观察者可能会出现无意视盲,即未能注意到出现在眼前的物体或事件。在一项无意视盲实验中,一个意外刺激与主要任务刺激同时呈现,并对其可检测性进行探究。我们评估了一种常用于将观察者排除在数据分析之外的标准。在最后一次实验试验中,观察者不执行主要任务,而是寻找任何新出现的事物。在这次全神贯注试验中未能报告意外刺激的观察者将被排除。基于4个假设实验以及对文献中128个实际实验的综述,我们证明了实施全神贯注试验排除标准可能会带来一些潜在的问题后果。被排除的观察者可能集中在实验条件中,并且该排除标准可能导致研究人员低估无意视盲的普遍性。它甚至可能使我们在全神贯注试验中对无意视盲视而不见

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验