Suppr超能文献

多感觉和基于预期的促进的共同生理相关物。

Shared Physiological Correlates of Multisensory and Expectation-Based Facilitation.

机构信息

Department for Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Biology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld 33615, Germany.

Cognitive Interaction Technology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld 33615, Germany.

出版信息

eNeuro. 2020 Mar 9;7(2). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0435-19.2019. Print 2020 Mar/Apr.

Abstract

Perceptual performance in a visual task can be enhanced by simultaneous multisensory information, but can also be enhanced by a symbolic or amodal cue inducing a specific expectation. That similar benefits can arise from multisensory information and within-modality expectation raises the question of whether the underlying neurophysiological processes are the same or distinct. We investigated this by comparing the influence of the following three types of auxiliary probabilistic cues on visual motion discrimination in humans: (1) acoustic motion, (2) a premotion visual symbolic cue, and (3) a postmotion symbolic cue. Using multivariate analysis of the EEG data, we show that both the multisensory and preceding visual symbolic cue enhance the encoding of visual motion direction as reflected by cerebral activity arising from occipital regions ∼200-400 ms post-stimulus onset. This suggests a common or overlapping physiological correlate of cross-modal and intramodal auxiliary information, pointing to a neural mechanism susceptive to both multisensory and more abstract probabilistic cues. We also asked how prestimulus activity shapes the cue-stimulus combination and found a differential influence on the cross-modal and intramodal combination: while alpha power modulated the relative weight of visual motion and the acoustic cue, it did not modulate the behavioral influence of a visual symbolic cue, pointing to differences in how prestimulus activity shapes the combination of multisensory and abstract cues with task-relevant information.

摘要

在视觉任务中,同时的多感官信息可以增强感知表现,但也可以通过符号或非模态提示来增强特定的预期。类似的好处可以来自多感官信息和内模态预期,这就提出了一个问题,即潜在的神经生理过程是相同的还是不同的。我们通过比较以下三种类型的辅助概率提示对人类视觉运动辨别力的影响来研究这个问题:(1)听觉运动,(2)预运动视觉符号提示,(3)后运动符号提示。使用 EEG 数据的多元分析,我们表明,多感官和前面的视觉符号提示都增强了视觉运动方向的编码,这反映在刺激后约 200-400 毫秒出现的来自枕叶区域的大脑活动中。这表明跨模态和内模态辅助信息具有共同或重叠的生理相关性,指向对多感官和更抽象的概率提示都敏感的神经机制。我们还询问了前刺激活动如何塑造提示-刺激组合,并发现了对跨模态和内模态组合的不同影响:虽然 alpha 功率调节了视觉运动和听觉提示的相对权重,但它没有调节视觉符号提示的行为影响,这表明在前刺激活动如何塑造多感官和抽象提示与任务相关信息的组合方面存在差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4497/7070445/4038284df396/SN-ENUJ200035F001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验