Zhan Shing Hei, Shih Chun-Chi, Liu Shao-Lun
Department of Zoology & Biodiversity Research Centre the University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada.
Department of Life Science & Center for Ecology and Environment Tunghai University Taichung Taiwan.
Ecol Evol. 2020 Jan 11;10(3):1299-1310. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5984. eCollection 2020 Feb.
Selection of appropriate genetic markers to quantify phylogenetic diversity is crucial for community ecology studies. Yet, systematic evaluation of marker genes for this purpose is scarcely done. Recently, the combined effort of phycologists has produced a rich plastid genome resource with taxonomic representation spanning all of the major lineages of the red algae (Rhodophyta). In this proof-of-concept study, we leveraged this resource by developing and applying a phylogenomic strategy to seek candidate plastid markers suitable for phylogenetic community analysis. We ranked the core genes of 107 published plastid genomes based on various sequence-derived properties and their tree distance to plastid genome phylogenies. The resulting ranking revealed that the most widely used marker, L, is not necessarily the optimal marker, while other promising markers might have been overlooked. We designed and tested PCR primers for several candidate marker genes, and successfully amplified one of them, , in a taxonomically broad set of red algal specimens. We suggest that our general marker identification methodology and the primers will be useful to the phycological community for investigating the biodiversity and community ecology of the red algae.
选择合适的遗传标记来量化系统发育多样性对于群落生态学研究至关重要。然而,为此目的对标记基因进行系统评估的工作却很少开展。最近,藻类学家们共同努力,生成了丰富的质体基因组资源,其分类代表性涵盖了红藻(红藻门)所有主要谱系。在这项概念验证研究中,我们利用这一资源,通过开发和应用一种系统发育基因组学策略来寻找适合系统发育群落分析的候选质体标记。我们根据各种基于序列的特性及其与质体基因组系统发育的树距离,对107个已发表质体基因组的核心基因进行了排名。结果排名显示,最广泛使用的标记L不一定是最佳标记,而其他有前景的标记可能被忽视了。我们为几个候选标记基因设计并测试了PCR引物,并成功地在分类广泛的红藻标本中扩增出其中一个基因。我们建议,我们的通用标记鉴定方法和引物将对藻类学界研究红藻的生物多样性和群落生态学有用。