• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种不同微创经皮肾穿刺取石鞘治疗鹿角结石的比较。

Comparison of two different minimally invasive percutaneous nephrostomy sheaths for the treatment of staghorn stones.

机构信息

Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2020 Jun;125(6):898-904. doi: 10.1111/bju.15031. Epub 2020 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1111/bju.15031
PMID:32077229
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and effectiveness of using a conventional nephrostomy sheath (NS) vs using a new NS with suction and evacuation functions in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) for the treatment of staghorn stones.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective and randomised study of 60 patients with staghorn stones randomly assigned into two groups of 30 patients. One group underwent MPCNL using conventional NS, whereas the other group underwent MPCNL with suction-evacuation NS (SENS). Patient demographics, stone characteristics, intraoperative data, perioperative data, and surgical results were collected and analysed.

RESULTS

The patient demographics and stone characteristics were similar amongst the two groups. The SENS group had a significantly lower peak and a significantly lower average renal pelvic pressure (RPP) throughout the procedure. The SENS group was more efficient for stone removal and had a much shorter stone treatment time, a lesser use of the stone extractor, and ultimately a higher stone-free rate (SFR). The effects of a lower RPP and shorter stone treatment time translated into less severe postoperative complications as measured per modified Clavien grade.

CONCLUSION

Using SENS in MPCNL for the treatment of staghorn stones has the advantages of lower RPP, increased effectiveness in stone retrieval, decreased surgery related complications, and an improved SFR.

摘要

目的

比较在微创经皮肾镜取石术(MPCNL)中使用传统肾盂造瘘鞘(NS)与使用具有抽吸和清除功能的新型 NS 治疗鹿角结石的安全性和有效性。

患者与方法

前瞻性随机研究了 60 例鹿角结石患者,将其随机分为两组,每组 30 例。一组患者接受传统 NS 的 MPCNL,另一组患者接受具有抽吸清除功能的 NS(SENS)的 MPCNL。收集并分析患者的人口统计学资料、结石特征、术中数据、围手术期数据和手术结果。

结果

两组患者的人口统计学资料和结石特征相似。整个手术过程中,SENS 组的峰值和平均肾盂压力(RPP)明显更低。SENS 组在结石清除方面效率更高,结石治疗时间更短,结石提取器的使用更少,最终结石清除率(SFR)更高。较低的 RPP 和较短的结石治疗时间降低了术后并发症的严重程度,这是按照改良 Clavien 分级来衡量的。

结论

在 MPCNL 中使用 SENS 治疗鹿角结石具有降低 RPP、提高结石清除效果、减少手术相关并发症和提高 SFR 的优点。

相似文献

1
Comparison of two different minimally invasive percutaneous nephrostomy sheaths for the treatment of staghorn stones.两种不同微创经皮肾穿刺取石鞘治疗鹿角结石的比较。
BJU Int. 2020 Jun;125(6):898-904. doi: 10.1111/bju.15031. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
2
Suctioning versus traditional minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy to treat renal staghorn calculi: A case-matched comparative study.超声引导经皮肾镜碎石取石术与传统微创经皮肾镜碎石取石术治疗鹿角形肾结石:一项病例匹配的对比研究。
Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.032. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
3
Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery with flexible ureteroscope for partial staghorn calculi: A randomised controlled trial.微创经皮肾镜取石术与软性输尿管镜下内镜联合肾内手术治疗部分鹿角形结石的随机对照试验
Int J Surg. 2016 Apr;28:22-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.02.056. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
4
The optimal minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy strategy for the treatment of staghorn stones in a solitary kidney.治疗孤立肾鹿角形结石的最佳微创经皮肾镜取石术策略
Urolithiasis. 2016 Apr;44(2):149-54. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0803-3. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
5
Suctioning Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with a Patented System Is Effective to Treat Renal Staghorn Calculi: A Prospective Multicenter Study.使用专利系统进行微创经皮肾镜取石术吸引治疗鹿角形肾结石有效:一项前瞻性多中心研究
Urol Int. 2018;101(2):143-149. doi: 10.1159/000488399. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
6
Comparison of mini endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery and multitract minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy specifically for kidney staghorn stones: a single-centre experience.微通道经皮肾镜碎石术与多通道微创经皮肾镜碎石术治疗鹿角形肾结石的比较:单中心经验。
BMC Urol. 2022 Jun 30;22(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01030-7.
7
Comparison of renal pelvic pressure and postoperative fever incidence between standard- and mini-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy.标准通道与微通道经皮肾镜取石术肾盂压力及术后发热发生率的比较
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2017 Jan;33(1):36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2016.10.012. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
8
The New Generation Mini-PCNL System - Monitoring and Controlling of Renal Pelvic Pressure by Suctioning Device for Efficient and Safe PCNL in Managing Renal Staghorn Calculi.新一代迷你经皮肾镜取石术系统——通过抽吸装置监测和控制肾盂压力,以实现高效、安全地治疗肾铸形结石的经皮肾镜取石术。
Urol Int. 2016;97(1):61-6. doi: 10.1159/000442002. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
9
Perioperative and long-term results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: a single-center randomized controlled trial.后腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗鹿角形结石的围手术期和长期结果:一项单中心随机对照试验。
World J Urol. 2019 Jul;37(7):1441-1447. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2526-x. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
10
Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗常染色体显性遗传性多囊肾病患者的安全性和有效性。
J Endourol. 2014 Jan;28(1):17-22. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0443. Epub 2013 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of minimally invasive suction-evacuation versus standard nephrostomy sheaths for the treatment of partial staghorn stones.微创抽吸排空术与标准肾造瘘鞘治疗部分鹿角形结石的比较
Urolithiasis. 2025 Jul 24;53(1):143. doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01807-z.
2
Comment on "Modified amplatz sheath with suction versus standard sheath in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating large renal stones > 2 cm: a prospective randomized trial".关于“改良带抽吸的安普拉斯鞘与标准鞘在经皮肾镜取石术治疗直径>2cm 大肾结石中的应用:一项前瞻性随机试验”的评论
World J Urol. 2025 May 12;43(1):297. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05686-2.
3
Novel Flexible Ureteroscopic System for intrarenal pelvic and intracaliceal pressure measurement in porcine models.
用于猪模型肾内肾盂和肾盏内压力测量的新型柔性输尿管镜系统。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 12;15(1):16430. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00852-3.
4
Safety and efficacy of vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of renal stone disease: an analysis of stone free status and postoperative infectious complications.真空辅助微经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石的安全性和有效性:无石状态和术后感染性并发症的分析。
Int Braz J Urol. 2024 Nov-Dec;50(6):737-745. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0308.
5
Clinical comparison of lateral supine position mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and anatrophic nephrolithotomy in the treatment of complete staghorn renal calculi.侧卧位微创经皮肾取石术与后腹腔镜下离断性肾盂成形术治疗鹿角形肾结石的临床对比。
BMC Urol. 2024 Aug 7;24(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01555-z.
6
Assessment of Effectiveness and Safety of Aspiration-Assisted Nephrostomic Access Sheaths in PCNL and Intrarenal Pressures Evaluation: A Systematic Review of the Literature.经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)中抽吸辅助肾造瘘通道鞘的有效性和安全性评估及肾内压力评估:文献系统综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 26;13(9):2558. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092558.
7
A randomized controlled trial comparing infectious complications using mini perc with and without suction for renal stones less than 3 cm in size.一项比较 mini perc 联合与不联合吸引在肾结石大小小于 3cm 时应用导致感染并发症的随机对照试验。
Urolithiasis. 2023 Nov 22;52(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01487-7.
8
One-stage efficacy of single tract minimally invasive ECIRS in the improved prone frog split-leg position for staghorn stones.单通道微创经皮肾镜超声碎石清石术在改良俯卧蛙腿位治疗鹿角形结石中的一期疗效
BMC Urol. 2022 Apr 6;22(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01003-w.
9
Comparison of vacuum-assisted sheaths and normal sheaths in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创经皮肾镜取石术中真空辅助鞘与普通鞘的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2021 Nov 15;21(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00925-1.