1 Department of Health Behavior, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
2 Social Policy, Health, & Economics Research Unit, RTI International, Holly Springs, NC, USA.
Am J Health Promot. 2019 Jun;33(5):652-665. doi: 10.1177/0890117119842047. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
To provide a nationally representative snapshot of workplace health promotion (WHP) and protection practices among United States worksites.
Cross-sectional, self-report Workplace Health in America (WHA) Survey between November 2016 and September 2017.
National.
Random sample of US worksites with ≥10 employees, stratified by region, size, and North American Industrial Classification System sector.
Workplace health promotion programs, program administration, evidence-based strategies, health screenings, disease management, incentives, work-life policies, implementation barriers, and occupational safety and health (OSH).
Descriptive statistics, t tests, and logistic regression.
Among eligible worksites, 10.1% (n = 3109) responded, 2843 retained in final sample, and 46.1% offered some type of WHP program. The proportion of comparable worksites with comprehensive programs (as defined in Healthy People 2010) rose from 6.9% in 2004 to 17.1% in 2017 ( P < .001). Occupational safety and health programs were more prevalent than WHP programs, and 83.5% of all worksites had an individual responsible for employee safety, while only 72.2% of those with a WHP program had an individual responsible for it. Smaller worksites were less likely than larger to offer most programs.
The prevalence of WHP programs has increased but remains low across most health programs; few worksites have comprehensive programs. Smaller worksites have persistent deficits and require targeted approaches; integrated OSH and WHP efforts may help. Ongoing monitoring using the WHA Survey benchmarks OSH and WHP in US worksites, updates estimates from previous surveys, and identifies gaps in research and practice.
提供美国工作场所健康促进 (WHP) 和保护实践的全国代表性快照。
横断面、自我报告的美国工作场所健康调查 (WHA) 于 2016 年 11 月至 2017 年 9 月进行。
全国。
随机抽取美国有≥10 名员工的工作场所,按地区、规模和北美产业分类系统部门分层。
工作场所健康促进计划、计划管理、基于证据的策略、健康筛查、疾病管理、激励措施、工作-生活政策、实施障碍和职业安全与健康 (OSH)。
描述性统计、t 检验和逻辑回归。
在合格的工作场所中,10.1%(n=3109)做出了回应,2843 人保留在最终样本中,46.1%提供了某种类型的 WHP 计划。全面计划(如 2010 年健康人定义)的可比工作场所比例从 2004 年的 6.9%上升到 2017 年的 17.1%(P<.001)。职业安全与健康计划比 WHP 计划更为普遍,83.5%的工作场所都有负责员工安全的个人,而只有 72.2%的 WHP 计划有负责人员。较小的工作场所比较大的工作场所更不可能提供大多数计划。
尽管大多数健康计划的 WHP 计划的流行率有所增加,但仍然很低;很少有工作场所拥有全面的计划。较小的工作场所仍然存在持续的缺陷,需要采取有针对性的方法;综合 OSH 和 WHP 工作可能会有所帮助。使用 WHA 调查持续监测美国工作场所的 OSH 和 WHP,更新以前调查的估计,并确定研究和实践中的差距。