Suppr超能文献

美国职场健康调查结果。

Results of the Workplace Health in America Survey.

机构信息

1 Department of Health Behavior, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

2 Social Policy, Health, & Economics Research Unit, RTI International, Holly Springs, NC, USA.

出版信息

Am J Health Promot. 2019 Jun;33(5):652-665. doi: 10.1177/0890117119842047. Epub 2019 Apr 22.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To provide a nationally representative snapshot of workplace health promotion (WHP) and protection practices among United States worksites.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional, self-report Workplace Health in America (WHA) Survey between November 2016 and September 2017.

SETTING

National.

PARTICIPANTS

Random sample of US worksites with ≥10 employees, stratified by region, size, and North American Industrial Classification System sector.

MEASURES

Workplace health promotion programs, program administration, evidence-based strategies, health screenings, disease management, incentives, work-life policies, implementation barriers, and occupational safety and health (OSH).

ANALYSIS

Descriptive statistics, t tests, and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among eligible worksites, 10.1% (n = 3109) responded, 2843 retained in final sample, and 46.1% offered some type of WHP program. The proportion of comparable worksites with comprehensive programs (as defined in Healthy People 2010) rose from 6.9% in 2004 to 17.1% in 2017 ( P < .001). Occupational safety and health programs were more prevalent than WHP programs, and 83.5% of all worksites had an individual responsible for employee safety, while only 72.2% of those with a WHP program had an individual responsible for it. Smaller worksites were less likely than larger to offer most programs.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of WHP programs has increased but remains low across most health programs; few worksites have comprehensive programs. Smaller worksites have persistent deficits and require targeted approaches; integrated OSH and WHP efforts may help. Ongoing monitoring using the WHA Survey benchmarks OSH and WHP in US worksites, updates estimates from previous surveys, and identifies gaps in research and practice.

摘要

目的

提供美国工作场所健康促进 (WHP) 和保护实践的全国代表性快照。

设计

横断面、自我报告的美国工作场所健康调查 (WHA) 于 2016 年 11 月至 2017 年 9 月进行。

地点

全国。

参与者

随机抽取美国有≥10 名员工的工作场所,按地区、规模和北美产业分类系统部门分层。

措施

工作场所健康促进计划、计划管理、基于证据的策略、健康筛查、疾病管理、激励措施、工作-生活政策、实施障碍和职业安全与健康 (OSH)。

分析

描述性统计、t 检验和逻辑回归。

结果

在合格的工作场所中,10.1%(n=3109)做出了回应,2843 人保留在最终样本中,46.1%提供了某种类型的 WHP 计划。全面计划(如 2010 年健康人定义)的可比工作场所比例从 2004 年的 6.9%上升到 2017 年的 17.1%(P<.001)。职业安全与健康计划比 WHP 计划更为普遍,83.5%的工作场所都有负责员工安全的个人,而只有 72.2%的 WHP 计划有负责人员。较小的工作场所比较大的工作场所更不可能提供大多数计划。

结论

尽管大多数健康计划的 WHP 计划的流行率有所增加,但仍然很低;很少有工作场所拥有全面的计划。较小的工作场所仍然存在持续的缺陷,需要采取有针对性的方法;综合 OSH 和 WHP 工作可能会有所帮助。使用 WHA 调查持续监测美国工作场所的 OSH 和 WHP,更新以前调查的估计,并确定研究和实践中的差距。

相似文献

1
Results of the Workplace Health in America Survey.
Am J Health Promot. 2019 Jun;33(5):652-665. doi: 10.1177/0890117119842047. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
2
Results of the 2004 National Worksite Health Promotion Survey.
Am J Public Health. 2008 Aug;98(8):1503-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.100313. Epub 2007 Nov 29.
3
Health promotion programs in small worksites: results of a national survey.
Am J Health Promot. 1999 Jul-Aug;13(6):358-65. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-13.6.358.
4
Prevalence of Workplace Health Practices and Policies in Hospitals: Results From the Workplace Health in America Study.
Am J Health Promot. 2020 Nov;34(8):867-875. doi: 10.1177/0890117120905232. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
5
Healthy workplaces? A survey of Massachusetts employers.
Am J Health Promot. 2013 Jul-Aug;27(6):390-400. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.110216-QUAN-72. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
9
An Overview of State Policies Supporting Worksite Health Promotion Programs.
Am J Health Promot. 2017 May;31(3):232-242. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.141008-QUAN-505. Epub 2016 Jan 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The Potentials of Digital Workplace Health Promotion.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jul 10;21(7):902. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21070902.
3
Understanding lactation policies and resources across a university system: survey and document review.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 May 15;24(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06541-9.
4
Employment Characteristics and Tobacco Product Use, U.S., 2021.
Am J Prev Med. 2024 Sep;67(3):423-433. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.05.001. Epub 2024 May 8.
5
Who chooses "healthy" meals? An analysis of lunchtime meal quality in a workplace cafeteria.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 29;24(1):921. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18284-5.
6
Return to work after Post-COVID: describing affected employees' perceptions of personal resources, organizational offerings and care pathways.
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 27;11:1282507. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1282507. eCollection 2023.
7
Barriers and Facilitators to Participation and Key Components of Sleep Health Programs: Perspectives for the Corporate Work Environment.
J Occup Environ Med. 2024 Jan 1;66(1):35-42. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002991. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
9
Effects of Workplace Variables on Workers Intentions to Misuse Prescription Opioids.
J Occup Environ Med. 2023 Nov 1;65(11):e717-e721. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002956. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
10
Yoga perspective on personal excellence and well-being.
J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2023 May-Jun;14(3):100717. doi: 10.1016/j.jaim.2023.100717. Epub 2023 May 22.

本文引用的文献

2
Incentives and Big E Engagement.
Am J Health Promot. 2017 Nov;31(6):462-464. doi: 10.1177/0890117117737221.
4
Workplace Wellness Programs Study: Final Report.
Rand Health Q. 2013 Jun 1;3(2):7. eCollection 2013 Summer.
6
Do workplace health promotion (wellness) programs work?
J Occup Environ Med. 2014 Sep;56(9):927-34. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000276.
8
National workplace health promotion surveys: the Affordable Care Act and future surveys.
Am J Health Promot. 2014 Jan-Feb;28(3):142-5. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.121212-CIT-602.
9
An employee total health management-based survey of Iowa employers.
J Occup Environ Med. 2013 Dec;55(12 Suppl):S73-7. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000045.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验