Ling Pamela M, Lisha Nadra E, Neilands Torsten B, Jordan Jeffrey W
Division of General Internal Medicine and Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, Department of Medicine, 8785University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, 8785University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Am J Health Promot. 2020 Sep;34(7):754-761. doi: 10.1177/0890117120904917. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
To evaluate the impact of a Social Branding intervention in bars and nightclubs on smoking behavior.
Quasi-experimental controlled study.
Bars and nightclubs in San Diego and San Francisco (intervention) and Los Angeles (control).
"Hipster" young adults (age 18-26) attending bars and nightclubs.
Anti-tobacco messages delivered through monthly anti-tobacco music/social events, opinion leaders, original art, direct mail, promotional activities, and online media.
A total of 7240 surveys were collected in 3 cities using randomized time location sampling at baseline (2012-2013) and follow-up (2015-2016); data were analyzed in 2018. The primary outcome was current smoking.
Multivariable logistic regression assessed correlates of smoking, adjusting for covariates including electronic cigarette use; differences between cities were evaluated using location-by-time interactions.
Smoking in San Francisco decreased at a significantly faster rate (51.1%-44.1%) than Los Angeles (45.2%-44.5%) ( = .034). Smoking in San Diego (mean: 39.6%) was significantly lower than Los Angeles (44.8%, < .001) at both time points with no difference in rate of change. Brand recall was not associated with smoking behavior, but recall was associated with anti-tobacco attitudes that were associated with smoking.
This is the first controlled study of Social Branding interventions. Intervention implementation was accompanied by decreases in smoking (San Francisco) and sustained lower smoking (San Diego) among young adult bar patrons over 3 years.
评估在酒吧和夜总会开展的社会品牌干预对吸烟行为的影响。
准实验对照研究。
圣地亚哥和旧金山的酒吧和夜总会(干预组)以及洛杉矶的酒吧和夜总会(对照组)。
光顾酒吧和夜总会的“潮人”青年(年龄18 - 26岁)。
通过每月一次的反烟草音乐/社交活动、意见领袖、原创艺术、直邮、促销活动及网络媒体传递反烟草信息。
在3个城市采用随机时间地点抽样法,于基线期(2012 - 2013年)和随访期(2015 - 2016年)共收集7240份调查问卷;2018年对数据进行分析。主要结局指标为当前吸烟情况。
多变量逻辑回归评估吸烟的相关因素,并对包括电子烟使用在内的协变量进行校正;使用地点与时间的交互作用评估城市间差异。
旧金山吸烟率下降速度(从51.1%降至44.1%)显著快于洛杉矶(从45.2%降至44.5%)(P = 0.034)。在两个时间点,圣地亚哥的吸烟率(平均39.6%)均显著低于洛杉矶(44.8%,P < 0.001),且变化率无差异。品牌回忆与吸烟行为无关,但与反烟草态度相关,而反烟草态度又与吸烟相关。
这是第一项关于社会品牌干预的对照研究。干预措施实施后,3年间青年成年酒吧顾客的吸烟率在旧金山有所下降,在圣地亚哥持续保持较低水平。